An augmented cohesive element for coarse meshes in delamination analysis of composites

Abstract Numerical analysis of delamination failure in composite laminates is very often carried out with cohesive interface element in a finite element framework, due to their robustness and ease of use. Explicit time integration is often preferred, to overcome material and damage non-linearity and impact loading scenarios. However, a very fine mesh is needed to correctly represent the nonlinear cohesive zone ahead of the numerical crack tip to achieve a stable and mesh size insensitive global failure response. This is especially true for mode I delamination cases, where the cohesive zone is extremely small, owing to a low critical energy release rate. This mesh size requirement limits the applicability of cohesive zone models largely to coupon scale problems. The current work augments cohesive elements with additional rotational degrees of freedom at the nodes, which enables a higher order displacement approximation and allows relatively coarser mesh to be used. The present formulation is applied to a mode I delamination benchmark problem, which demonstrates the superiority of the augmented element over the traditional cohesive element in terms of coarse-mesh accuracy and computational time saving.

[1]  P. Camanho,et al.  Simulation of delamination by means of cohesive elements using an explicit finite element code , 2009 .

[2]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  A crack tip tracking algorithm for cohesive interface element analysis of fatigue delamination propagation in composite materials , 2012 .

[3]  M Mohammad Samimi,et al.  An enriched cohesive zone model for delamination in brittle interfaces , 2009 .

[4]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  Mode I fracture in adhesively-bonded joints: A mesh-size independent modelling approach using cohesive elements , 2014 .

[5]  Stephen R Hallett,et al.  Cohesive zone length in numerical simulations of composite delamination , 2008 .

[6]  D. Allman A quadrilateral finite element including vertex rotations for plane elasticity analysis , 1988 .

[7]  Michael R Wisnom,et al.  A concise interface constitutive law for analysis of delamination and splitting in composite materials and its application to scaled notched tensile specimens , 2007 .

[8]  M. A. Crisfield,et al.  Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements , 1998 .

[9]  M. Crisfield,et al.  Finite element interface models for the delamination analysis of laminated composites: mechanical and computational issues , 2001 .

[10]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Fracture length scales in human cortical bone: the necessity of nonlinear fracture models. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[11]  Tong Earn Tay,et al.  A floating node method for the modelling of discontinuities in composites , 2014 .

[12]  Lorenzo Iannucci,et al.  Formulation and implementation of decohesion elements in an explicit finite element code , 2006 .

[13]  E. Lund,et al.  Interface elements for fatigue-driven delaminations in advanced composite materials , 2015 .

[14]  G.A.O. Davies,et al.  Decohesion finite element with enriched basis functions for delamination , 2009 .

[15]  Erik Lund,et al.  Analysis of the integration of cohesive elements in regard to utilization of coarse mesh in laminated composite materials , 2014 .

[16]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models , 2007 .

[17]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Failure Criteria for Frp Laminates in Plane Stress , 2013 .

[18]  Robert D. Cook,et al.  On the Allman triangle and a related quadrilateral element , 1986 .

[19]  Vincent B. C. Tan,et al.  Adaptive floating node method for modelling cohesive fracture of composite materials , 2018 .

[20]  Alberto Corigliano,et al.  Damage analysis of interlaminar fracture specimens , 1995 .

[21]  Qingda Yang,et al.  Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites , 2005 .

[22]  R. Cook,et al.  Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis , 1974 .