Mapping of cleats and fractures as an indicator of in-situ stress orientation, Jharia coalfield, India

Abstract Cleats and fractures in coal of Barakar Formation in Jharia coalfield, India have been mapped from the coal exposures around 21 opencast and 2 underground coal mines. Macro-cleat distribution, observed from this mapping is similar to that of well-developed coalbed methane (CBM) basins. The opencast coal mines are distributed in SE–NW direction along the boundary of the sickle shaped Jharia coal basin. Permeability of CBM through coal seams is the most critical property deciding the viability of any CBM field. It is largely controlled by the degree of cleat development. This paper discusses cleat orientation and other structural features, observed in the outcrops of 14 major coal seams in Jharia coalfield and its directional relationship with the in-situ stress (SH) orientation pattern. Cleat orientation is found to vary laterally within same seam at the different locations, distributed from the south-east part to the north-western part of Jharia coalfield. Face cleat orientation of the 21 opencast coal mines varies from N45°E to N45°W. Change of orientation of cleat, observed around the mining areas is related the orientation of fault systems and orientation of igneous intrusions occurring within the coal bearing packet. Maximum in-situ horizontal compressive stress (SH) direction is found to be parallel to the face cleat orientation in normal faulted basin like Jharia coalfield. An overall, NNE–SSW and NW–SE orientation of the SH direction is predicted in the coal mines from cleat orientation mapping. SH orientation is locally modified at places, close to the tectonic features and igneous intrusives. Finite element stress modeling is carried out near Moonidih area. Cleat orientation predicted stress direction matches well with the finite element stress results.

[1]  Walter B. Ayers.  Coalbed gas systems, resources, and production and a review of contrasting cases from the San Juan and Powder River basins , 2002 .

[2]  J. Olson,et al.  Characteristics and origins of coal cleat: A review , 1998 .

[3]  Sohei Shimada,et al.  Anisotropy of gas permeability associated with cleat pattern in a coal seam of the Kushiro coalfield in Japan , 2004 .

[4]  B. Lawn.  Fracture of Brittle Solids by Brian Lawn , 1993 .

[5]  G. D. Stricker,et al.  Methanogenic pathways of coal-bed gas in the Powder River Basin, United States: The geologic factor , 2008 .

[6]  A. Henk.  Pre-drilling prediction of the tectonic stress field with geomechanical models , 2005 .

[7]  T. Gentzis,et al.  Horizontal degasification and characterization of coals in the Sabinas Sub-basin, Mexico: implications for CBM production , 2006 .

[8]  M. Zoback.  First‐ and second‐order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The World Stress Map Project , 1992 .

[9]  Stefan Bachu,et al.  In situ stress magnitude and orientation estimates for Cretaceous coal-bearing strata beneath the plains area of central and southern Alberta , 2003 .

[10]  J. Buraczyński.  Lithological, mineralogical and geochemical characteristics of loesses in the Rhinegraben , 1988 .

[11]  Zhaoping Meng,et al.  In-situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the Southern Qinshui Basin , 2011 .

[12]  U. Chandra.  Earthquakes of peninsular India—a seismotectonic study , 1977 .

[13]  X. Su,et al.  The characteristics and origins of cleat in coal from Western North China , 2001 .

[14]  S. Sichel,et al.  Hydraulic fracturing as a possible mechanism of dyke-sill transitions and horizontal discordant intrusions in trachytic tabular bodies of Arraial do Cabo, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil , 2008 .

[15]  M. Goldhaber,et al.  Origin of minerals in joint and cleat systems of the Pottsville Formation, Black Warrior basin, Alabama: Implications for coalbed methane generation and production , 2003 .

[16]  J. Bell.  In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada , 2006 .

[17]  J. Moore,et al.  Fluidized sandstone intrusions as an indicator of Paleostress orientation, Santa Cruz, California , 2002 .

[18]  P. K. Khan,et al.  Source parameters and focal mechanisms of local earthquakes: Single broadband observatory at ISM Dhanbad , 2009 .

[19]  J. Pashin.  Stratigraphy and structure of coalbed methane reservoirs in the United States: An overview , 1998 .

[20]  Frank van Bergen,et al.  Determination of the cleat angle distribution of the RECOPOL coal seams, using CT-scans and image analysis on drilling cuttings and coal blocks , 2008 .

[21]  C. Karacan,et al.  Fracture/cleat analysis of coals from Zonguldak Basin (northwestern Turkey) relative to the potential of coalbed methane production , 2000 .

[22]  Nathan Deisman,et al.  Geomechanical properties and permeability of coals from the Foothills and Mountain regions of western Canada , 2007 .

[23]  S. Laubach.  A Method to Detect Natural Fracture Strike in Sandstones , 1997 .

[24]  S. Paul,et al.  Determination of in-situ stress direction from cleat orientation mapping for coal bed methane exploration in south-eastern part of Jharia coalfield, India , 2011 .

[25]  P. Dasgupta.  Experimental decipherment of the soft-sediment deformation observed in the upper part of the Talchir Formation (Lower Permian), Jharia Basin, India , 2008 .

[26]  Vicki G. Moon,et al.  Geological controls on rock mass classification of coal from Huntly East Mine, New Zealand , 2004 .

[27]  R. Gayer,et al.  A review of joints (cleats) in British Carboniferous coals: indicators of palaeostress orientation , 2006 .

[28]  Maria Mastalerz,et al.  Cleats and their relation to geologic lineaments and coalbed methane potential in Pennsylvanian coals in Indiana , 2007 .

[29]  AN OVERVIEW OF THE POTENTIALS AND PROSPECTS OF COALBED METHANE EXPLORATION AND EXPLOITATION IN THE PERMO-CARBONIFEROUS COAL MEASURES OF THE BARAKAR FORMATION, JHARIA BASIN, INDIA , 2004 .

[30]  O. Heidbach,et al.  Tectonic stress in the Earth’s crust: advances in the World Stress Map project , 2003, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[31]  J. Wees,et al.  Faulting, fracturing and in-situ stress prediction in the Ahnet Basin, Algeria - a finite element approach. , 2000 .

[32]  K. Michael,et al.  Possible controls of hydrogeological and stress regimes on the producibility of coalbed methane in Upper Cretaceous–Tertiary strata of the Alberta basin, Canada , 2003 .

[33]  Stephen E. Laubach,et al.  Are open fractures necessarily aligned with maximum horizontal stress , 2004 .

[34]  S. Bachu,et al.  Stress Regime in the Cretaceous Succession of the Alberta Basin: A Predictor for Coal Bed Methane Producibility , 2001 .