Impact of Routine Invasive Physiology at Time of Angiography in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease on Reclassi fi cation of Revascularization Strategy
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Kische | M. Meuwissen | E. Belle | V. Klauss | M. Balghith | R. Gil | G. Sardella | B. Witzenbichler | J. Clerc | F. Vincent | P. Commeau | I. Lang | L. Testa | W. Wąsek | N. Debry | M. Cercek | G. Gabrielli | M. Vlachojannis
[1] A. Jeremias,et al. Use of the Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] E. Omerovic,et al. Instantaneous Wave‐free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.
[3] M. Costa,et al. Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Evaluation During Coronary Angiography on Management Strategy and Clinical Outcome: One-Year Results of the POST-IT Multicenter Registry , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[4] G. Rioufol,et al. Routine Fractional Flow Reserve Combined to Diagnostic Coronary Angiography as a One-Stop Procedure: Episode 3. , 2016, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[5] A. Jeremias,et al. Prospective Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio to Assess Coronary Stenosis Relevance: Results of ADVISE II International, Multicenter Study (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation II). , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[6] A. Jeremias,et al. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: the RESOLVE study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[7] G. Rioufol,et al. Routine pressure wire assessment at time of diagnostic angiography: is it ready for prime time? , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[8] B. Dimitrov,et al. Does Routine Pressure Wire Assessment Influence Management Strategy at Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Chest Pain?: The RIPCORD Study , 2014, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[9] G. Rioufol,et al. Outcome Impact of Coronary Revascularization Strategy Reclassification With Fractional Flow Reserve at Time of Diagnostic Angiography: Insights From a Large French Multicenter Fractional Flow Reserve Registry , 2014, Circulation.
[10] A. Hughes,et al. Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[11] A. Hughes,et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration. Results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] J. Messenger,et al. A contemporary view of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: a report from the CathPCI Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry, 2010 through June 2011. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] Nikola Jagic,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[14] P. Damman,et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Combined Intracoronary Pressure and Flow Velocity Information During Baseline Conditions: Adenosine-Free Assessment of Functional Coronary Lesion Severity , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[15] A. Hughes,et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] Uwe Siebert,et al. Clinical ResearchInterventional CardiologyFractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: 2-Year Follow-Up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) Study , 2010 .
[17] Sanjay Kaul,et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.
[18] Grace A Lin,et al. Frequency of stress testing to document ischemia prior to elective percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2008, JAMA.
[19] K. Mahaffey,et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation , 2012 .
[20] Baris Gencer,et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation , 2011 .