Virtual Support Communities and Psychological Well-Being: The Role of Optimistic and Pessimistic Social Comparison Strategies

Do the beneficial or detrimental effects of CMC activity depend on the specific social comparison strategy individuals use? The present study aimed to answer this question by examining social comparison strategies, different measures of online activity within the community, and psychological well-being of users of online breast cancer support communities. Results showed that the relationship between online activity i.e., length of visits and frequency of posts and psychological well-being i.e., breast cancer related concerns and depression was determined by users' pessimistic social comparison strategy; downward identification influenced especially highly active users. Findings suggest that active CMC users should be careful not to become entrapped by negative social comparison processes.

[1]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Qimei Chen,et al.  Internet Community Group Participation: Psychosocial Benefits for Women with Breast Cancer , 2005, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[3]  J. Dunn,et al.  When peer support may be most beneficial: the relationship between upward comparison and perceived threat , 2011, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  C. Carver,et al.  Concerns about breast cancer and relations to psychosocial well-being in a multiethnic sample of early-stage patients. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[5]  Anika Batenburg,et al.  Emotional Approach Coping and the Effects of Online Peer-Led Support Group Participation Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Longitudinal Study , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  Bret R. Shaw,et al.  Empowering Processes and Outcomes of Participation in Online Support Groups for Patients With Breast Cancer, Arthritis, or Fibromyalgia , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[7]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  Benjamin A. Goldstein,et al.  Self-help On-line: An Outcome Evaluation of Breast Cancer Bulletin Boards , 2005, Journal of health psychology.

[9]  M. Hagen,et al.  Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[10]  Nicole C. Krämer,et al.  Social Comparison 2.0: Examining the Effects of Online Profiles on Social-Networking Sites , 2011, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[11]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Not all negative emotions are equal: the role of emotional expression in online support groups for women with breast cancer , 2006, Psycho-oncology.

[12]  S. Chambers,et al.  Survivor identity and post-traumatic growth after participating in challenge-based peer-support programmes. , 2011, British journal of health psychology.

[13]  L. Yardley,et al.  How does social comparison within a self-help group influence adjustment to chronic illness? A longitudinal study. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[14]  V. Helgeson,et al.  Long-term effects of educational and peer discussion group interventions on adjustment to breast cancer. , 2001, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[15]  Yoko Setoyama,et al.  Benefits of Peer Support in Online Japanese Breast Cancer Communities: Differences Between Lurkers and Posters , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Edson C. Tandoc,et al.  Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  J.M.A. Berkvens,et al.  De Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens , 2000 .

[18]  R. P. Vilhauer,et al.  Perceived Benefits of Online Support Groups for Women with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2009, Women & health.

[19]  C. V. van Uden-Kraan,et al.  Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients' empowerment. , 2009, Patient education and counseling.

[20]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[21]  Anne-Grete Sandaunet.  A Space for Suffering? Communicating Breast Cancer in an Online Self-Help Context , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[22]  John Suler,et al.  Fostering empowerment in online support groups , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  B. Buunk,et al.  Social comparison and coping with cancer treatment , 2000 .

[24]  Cameron Marlow,et al.  Social network activity and social well-being , 2010, CHI.

[25]  M. Irwin,et al.  Screening for depression in the older adult: criterion validity of the 10-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[26]  David Wellman,et al.  2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct". , 2010, The American psychologist.

[27]  C. V. van Uden-Kraan,et al.  Self-Reported Differences in Empowerment Between Lurkers and Posters in Online Patient Support Groups , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[29]  S. Brandon,et al.  Protection of personal data , 2004 .

[30]  Anne-Grete Sandaunet,et al.  The challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. , 2008, Sociology of health & illness.

[31]  J. Jonides,et al.  Facebook Use Predicts Declines in Subjective Well-Being in Young Adults , 2013, PloS one.

[32]  D S Tulsky,et al.  Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. , 1997, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Jesse Fox,et al.  The dark side of social networking sites: An exploration of the relational and psychological stressors associated with Facebook use and affordances , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Katrina Armstrong,et al.  Differences in information seeking among breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer patients: results from a population-based survey. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[35]  B. Ootim,et al.  Social Support , 1986, Ageing and Society.

[36]  M. Lieberman,et al.  The role of insightful disclosure in outcomes for women in peer‐directed breast cancer groups: a replication study , 2007, Psycho-oncology.

[37]  Fiona McTavish,et al.  From Diagnosis to Death: A Case Study of Coping With Breast Cancer as Seen Through Online Discussion Group Messages , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[38]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  Expression and reception of treatment information in breast cancer support groups: how health self-efficacy moderates effects on emotional well-being. , 2010, Patient education and counseling.

[39]  E. Das,et al.  Finding care for the caregiver? Active participation in online health forums attenuates the negative effect of caregiver strain on wellbeing , 2011 .