Advances in Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Enhanced Sampling Methods for the Study of Protein Systems
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Y. Duan,et al. Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization To Reproduce ab Initio Anisotropy. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[2] Dahlia R. Weiss,et al. Structure-based discovery of selective positive allosteric modulators of antagonists for the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[3] J. Andrew McCammon,et al. Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics: Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculation , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[4] Peter A. Kollman,et al. Conformational sampling and ensemble generation by molecular dynamics simulations: 18‐Crown‐6 as a test case , 1992 .
[5] K. Müller,et al. Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields , 2018, Nature Communications.
[6] Karen N. Allen,et al. An Experimental Approach to Mapping the Binding Surfaces of Crystalline Proteins , 1996 .
[7] R. Dror,et al. Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs , 2019, Nature Communications.
[8] Leif C. Kröger,et al. Assessing Statistical Uncertainties of Rare Events in Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[9] Y. Sugita,et al. Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .
[10] J. Higo,et al. Mutual population-shift driven antibody-peptide binding elucidated by molecular dynamics simulations , 2020, Scientific Reports.
[11] Vijay S Pande,et al. Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[12] Douglas E. V. Pires,et al. mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures , 2013, Bioinform..
[13] S. Genheden,et al. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.
[14] Sara Y. Cheng,et al. Polarizable Force Fields for Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Advances and Applications. , 2019, Annual review of biophysics.
[15] Hongxin Dong,et al. Protein-protein interactions underlying the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and Alzheimer’s disease , 2020, PloS one.
[16] F. Gervasio,et al. Exploring Cryptic Pockets Formation in Targets of Pharmaceutical Interest with SWISH. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[17] Heather A Carlson,et al. Moving Beyond Active-Site Detection: MixMD Applied to Allosteric Systems. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[18] Pengyu Y. Ren,et al. Reconciling NMR Structures of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein (NCp7) using Extensive Polarizable Force Field Free-Energy Simulations. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[19] Ruth Nussinov,et al. Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications. , 2019, Structure.
[20] Maxwell I. Zimmerman,et al. Designing small molecules to target cryptic pockets yields both positive and negative allosteric modulators , 2017, PloS one.
[21] J. Andrew McCammon,et al. Mass and step length optimization for the calculation of equilibrium properties by molecular dynamics simulation , 1990 .
[22] Omar N. A. Demerdash,et al. Improvements to the AMOEBA Force Field by Introducing Anisotropic Atomic Polarizability of the Water Molecule. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[23] R. Brüschweiler,et al. Balanced amino-acid specific molecular dynamics force field for the realistic simulation of both folded and disordered proteins. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[24] Mark E Tuckerman,et al. Stochastic Neural Network Approach for Learning High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[25] Gianni De Fabritiis,et al. PlayMolecule CrypticScout: Predicting Protein Cryptic Sites Using Mixed-Solvent Molecular Simulations , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] Michael W Deem,et al. Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[27] X. Daura,et al. Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[28] Colin A. Smith,et al. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[29] J M Masson,et al. Alanine-stretch scanning mutagenesis: a simple and efficient method to probe protein structure and function. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.
[30] Simon McIntosh-Smith,et al. High performance in silico virtual drug screening on many-core processors , 2015, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..
[31] R. Efremov,et al. Transmembrane Peptides as Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions: An Efficient Strategy to Target Cancer Cells? , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.
[32] Paul Robustelli,et al. Development of a force field for the simulation of single-chain proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[33] Robert Abel,et al. Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.
[34] Xiaoming Sun,et al. Alanine-shaving Mutagenesis to Determine Key Interfacial Residues Governing the Assembly of a Nano-cage Maxi-ferritin*♦ , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[35] R. Zwanzig. High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .
[36] Enrico Guarnera,et al. On the perturbation nature of allostery: sites, mutations, and signal modulation. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.
[37] F. Noé,et al. Complete protein–protein association kinetics in atomic detail revealed by molecular dynamics simulations and Markov modelling , 2017, Nature Chemistry.
[38] M. Cecchini,et al. An intermediate along the recovery stroke of myosin VI revealed by X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[39] Francesc Sabanés Zariquiey,et al. Cosolvent Analysis Toolkit (CAT): a robust hotspot identification platform for cosolvent simulations of proteins to expand the druggable proteome , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[40] Tai-Sung Lee,et al. GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[41] Guohui Li,et al. Higher Accuracy Achieved in the Simulations of Protein Structure Refinement, Protein Folding, and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using Polarizable Force Fields. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[42] Carlos H. M. Rodrigues,et al. mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..
[43] Benoît Roux,et al. Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[44] Guohui Li,et al. Accurate Evaluation of Ion Conductivity of the Gramicidin A Channel Using a Polarizable Force Field without Any Corrections. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[45] Enrico Guarnera,et al. Allosteric sites: remote control in regulation of protein activity. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.
[46] J. Gumbart,et al. Accelerating Membrane Simulations with Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[47] V. Pande,et al. Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.
[48] P. Sexton,et al. Probing the binding site of novel selective positive allosteric modulators at the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , 2018, Biochemical pharmacology.
[49] Jennifer L. Knight,et al. Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[50] M. Smieško,et al. Allosteric Binding Sites On Nuclear Receptors: Focus On Drug Efficacy and Selectivity , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.
[51] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. An Empirical Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator Model: Development History and Recent Applications , 2016, Chemical reviews.
[52] William Sinko,et al. Improved Reweighting of Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Free Energy Calculation , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[53] Markus Heinonen,et al. Flex ddG: Rosetta ensemble-based estimation of changes in protein-protein binding affinity upon mutation , 2017, bioRxiv.
[54] Haohao Fu,et al. Extended Adaptive Biasing Force Algorithm. An On-the-Fly Implementation for Accurate Free-Energy Calculations. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[55] Charles L. Brooks,et al. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[56] Chun Wu,et al. Convergence of replica exchange molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.
[57] M. Horrocks,et al. A sticky situation: Aberrant protein-protein interactions in Parkinson's disease. , 2020, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.
[58] H. Stern. Molecular simulation with variable protonation states at constant pH. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.
[59] Dawei Zhang,et al. Incorporating Polarizability of Backbone Hydrogen Bonds Improved Folding of Short α-Helical Peptides. , 2019, Biophysical journal.
[60] H. Hotelling. Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .
[61] J A McCammon,et al. Theoretical calculation of relative binding affinity in host-guest systems. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[62] Akinori Sarai,et al. ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein–nucleic acid interactions , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[63] G. Parisi,et al. Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme , 1992, hep-lat/9205018.
[64] Klaus Schulten,et al. Constant-pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Large Biomolecular Systems. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[66] D. Kozakov,et al. Improved Modeling of Peptide-Protein Binding Through Global Docking and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2019, bioRxiv.
[67] Michael J. Bodkin,et al. Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules , 2015, Chemical science.
[68] V. Gapsys,et al. Accurate and Rigorous Prediction of the Changes in Protein Free Energies in a Large‐Scale Mutation Scan , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.
[69] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations for fragment-based drug design. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.
[70] B. Roux,et al. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[71] Margaret E. Johnson,et al. Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[72] John Z. H. Zhang,et al. Interaction Entropy for Computational Alanine Scanning , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[73] A. Roitberg,et al. Long-Time-Step Molecular Dynamics through Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[74] Frank Noé,et al. Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.
[75] Dima Kozakov,et al. ClusPro PeptiDock: efficient global docking of peptide recognition motifs using FFT , 2017, Bioinform..
[76] J. Mccammon,et al. Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics in NAMD , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[77] Ivan Yu Torshin,et al. Numeric analysis of reversibility of classic movement equations and constructive criteria of estimating quality of molecular dynamic simulations , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.
[78] Mohammad M. Sultan,et al. MSMBuilder: Statistical Models for Biomolecular Dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.
[79] Qinggang Zhang,et al. Effect of electrostatic polarization and bridging water on CDK2-ligand binding affinities calculated using a highly efficient interaction entropy method. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[80] J. Gumbart,et al. Folding free energy landscapes of β-sheets with non-polarizable and polarizable CHARMM force fields. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.
[81] H. Gong,et al. Simulating the Activation of Voltage Sensing Domain for a Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Using Polarizable Force Field. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.
[82] Hongchun Li,et al. Intrinsic dynamics is evolutionarily optimized to enable allosteric behavior. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.
[83] A. Bogan,et al. Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[84] Julien Michel,et al. Reproducibility of Free Energy Calculations across Different Molecular Simulation Software Packages. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[85] Wei Jiang,et al. String method for Protein-Protein Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[86] Heather A Carlson,et al. MixMD Probeview: Robust Binding Site Prediction from Cosolvent Simulations , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[87] J. H. Zhang,et al. Correct folding of an α-helix and a β-hairpin using a polarized 2D torsional potential , 2015, Scientific Reports.
[88] Yuan-Ling Xia,et al. Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.
[89] S. Takada,et al. On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction , 2002 .
[90] Johan Åqvist,et al. Computational Prediction of Alanine Scanning and Ligand Binding Energetics in G-Protein Coupled Receptors , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[91] David A. Pearlman,et al. A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Free Energy Calculations , 1994 .
[92] Joshua A. Rackers,et al. An optimized charge penetration model for use with the AMOEBA force field. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.
[93] X. Barril,et al. Molecular simulations with solvent competition quantify water displaceability and provide accurate interaction maps of protein binding sites. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[94] Jianing Song,et al. Interaction entropy for computational alanine scanning in protein–protein binding , 2018 .
[95] John Z. H. Zhang,et al. Interaction Entropy: A New Paradigm for Highly Efficient and Reliable Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[96] Capturing the Flexibility of a Protein-Ligand Complex: Binding Free Energies from Different Enhanced Sampling Techniques. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[97] Reconciling NMR Structures of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein (NCp7) using Extensive Polarizable Force Field Free-Energy Simulations. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[98] Grubmüller,et al. Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: Conformational flooding. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.
[99] Y. Sugita,et al. Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations , 2000, cond-mat/0009120.
[100] K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al. Molecular dynamics-guided discovery of an ago-allosteric modulator for GPR40/FFAR1 , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[101] Vijay S. Pande,et al. Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask. , 2010, Methods.
[102] Ronald M Levy,et al. How kinetics within the unfolded state affects protein folding: an analysis based on markov state models and an ultra-long MD trajectory. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[103] Sotaro Fuchigami,et al. Slow dynamics in protein fluctuations revealed by time-structure based independent component analysis: the case of domain motions. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.
[104] R. Swendsen,et al. THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .
[105] Benjamin P. Cossins,et al. Understanding Cryptic Pocket Formation in Protein Targets by Enhanced Sampling Simulations. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[106] Stefan Boresch,et al. THE ROLE OF BONDED TERMS IN FREE ENERGY SIMULATIONS : 1. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .
[107] Donghyuk Suh,et al. A generalized linear response framework for expanded ensemble and replica exchange simulations. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.
[108] Pengyu Y. Ren,et al. Capturing Many-Body Interactions with Classical Dipole Induction Models , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[109] Andrew E. Torda,et al. Local elevation: A method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[110] B. VanSchouwen,et al. Cracking the allosteric code of NMR chemical shifts , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[111] A. Laio,et al. Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[112] Alessio Ciulli,et al. NMR approaches in structure-based lead discovery: Recent developments and new frontiers for targeting multi-protein complexes , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.
[113] J. H. Zhang,et al. Computational Alanine Scanning with Interaction Entropy for Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[114] Pengyu Y. Ren,et al. The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[115] K. Reuter,et al. Benchmarks and Dielectric Constants for Reparametrized OPLS and Polarizable Force Field Models of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[116] Frank Noé,et al. PyEMMA 2: A Software Package for Estimation, Validation, and Analysis of Markov Models. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[117] Dima Kozakov,et al. Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[118] Gail J. Bartlett,et al. Predicting and Experimentally Validating Hot-Spot Residues at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2019, ACS chemical biology.
[119] Qiang Shao,et al. From thermodynamics to kinetics: enhanced sampling of rare events. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.
[120] Albert C. Pan,et al. Atomic-level characterization of protein–protein association , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[121] Woody Sherman,et al. Deciphering Cryptic Binding Sites on Proteins by Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[122] Frank Noé,et al. Machine learning for molecular simulation , 2019, Annual review of physical chemistry.
[123] Michele Parrinello,et al. Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual Viewpoint. , 2016, Annual review of physical chemistry.
[124] N. Metropolis,et al. Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.
[126] Christophe Chipot,et al. The Adaptive Biasing Force Method: Everything You Always Wanted To Know but Were Afraid To Ask , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[127] Woody Sherman,et al. Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation , 2016, ACS omega.
[128] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields , 2019, Chemical reviews.
[129] Juan Fernández-Recio,et al. SKEMPI 2.0: an updated benchmark of changes in protein–protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation , 2018, bioRxiv.
[130] Frank Noé,et al. Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.
[131] M. Karplus,et al. Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.
[132] Jacob D. Durrant,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.
[133] Jason M. Swails,et al. Constant pH Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent Using Discrete Protonation States: Implementation, Testing, and Validation , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[134] J. Berg,et al. Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.
[135] Eric Darve,et al. Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.
[136] Ruth Nussinov,et al. Allostery: An Overview of Its History, Concepts, Methods, and Applications , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[137] C. Sagui,et al. Electrostatics interactions in classical simulations. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.
[138] Ray Luo,et al. Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations. 3. Polarizable water models conforming to Thole polarization screening schemes. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[139] Wei Zhang,et al. Strike a balance: Optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..
[140] M Levitt,et al. Molecular dynamics of native protein. II. Analysis and nature of motion. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.
[141] Dading Huang,et al. Computational analysis of hot spots and binding mechanism in the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction , 2019, RSC advances.
[142] Chris Oostenbrink,et al. Validation of Molecular Simulation: An Overview of Issues. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.
[143] J. Mongan,et al. Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.
[144] B. Brooks,et al. An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms , 1988 .
[145] Christophe Chipot,et al. Efficient determination of protein-protein standard binding free energies from first principles. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[146] Jie Li,et al. Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations. 4. van der Waals parametrization. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[147] Frank Noé,et al. Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.
[148] B. Berne,et al. Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[149] Xiaopeng Zhu,et al. Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis of α-Conotoxin GI Reveals the Residues Crucial for Activity at the Muscle Acetylcholine Receptor , 2018, Marine drugs.
[150] M. Karplus,et al. Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[151] David P. Anderson,et al. High-Throughput All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Distributed Computing , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[152] Markus Heinonen,et al. Flex ddG: Rosetta ensemble-based estimation of changes in protein-protein binding affinity upon mutation , 2017, bioRxiv.
[153] J. Kirkwood. Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .