Advances in Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Enhanced Sampling Methods for the Study of Protein Systems

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is a rigorous theoretical tool that when used efficiently could provide reliable answers to questions pertaining to the structure-function relationship of proteins. Data collated from protein dynamics can be translated into useful statistics that can be exploited to sieve thermodynamics and kinetics crucial for the elucidation of mechanisms responsible for the modulation of biological processes such as protein-ligand binding and protein-protein association. Continuous modernization of simulation tools enables accurate prediction and characterization of the aforementioned mechanisms and these qualities are highly beneficial for the expedition of drug development when effectively applied to structure-based drug design (SBDD). In this review, current all-atom MD simulation methods, with focus on enhanced sampling techniques, utilized to examine protein structure, dynamics, and functions are discussed. This review will pivot around computer calculations of protein-ligand and protein-protein systems with applications to SBDD. In addition, we will also be highlighting limitations faced by current simulation tools as well as the improvements that have been made to ameliorate their efficiency.

[1]  Y. Duan,et al.  Development of Polarizable Gaussian Model for Molecular Mechanical Calculations I: Atomic Polarizability Parameterization To Reproduce ab Initio Anisotropy. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[2]  Dahlia R. Weiss,et al.  Structure-based discovery of selective positive allosteric modulators of antagonists for the M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics: Unconstrained Enhanced Sampling and Free Energy Calculation , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[4]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Conformational sampling and ensemble generation by molecular dynamics simulations: 18‐Crown‐6 as a test case , 1992 .

[5]  K. Müller,et al.  Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields , 2018, Nature Communications.

[6]  Karen N. Allen,et al.  An Experimental Approach to Mapping the Binding Surfaces of Crystalline Proteins , 1996 .

[7]  R. Dror,et al.  Cryptic pocket formation underlies allosteric modulator selectivity at muscarinic GPCRs , 2019, Nature Communications.

[8]  Leif C. Kröger,et al.  Assessing Statistical Uncertainties of Rare Events in Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[9]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[10]  J. Higo,et al.  Mutual population-shift driven antibody-peptide binding elucidated by molecular dynamics simulations , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Enhanced modeling via network theory: Adaptive sampling of Markov state models. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[12]  Douglas E. V. Pires,et al.  mCSM: predicting the effects of mutations in proteins using graph-based signatures , 2013, Bioinform..

[13]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[14]  Sara Y. Cheng,et al.  Polarizable Force Fields for Biomolecular Simulations: Recent Advances and Applications. , 2019, Annual review of biophysics.

[15]  Hongxin Dong,et al.  Protein-protein interactions underlying the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) and Alzheimer’s disease , 2020, PloS one.

[16]  F. Gervasio,et al.  Exploring Cryptic Pockets Formation in Targets of Pharmaceutical Interest with SWISH. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[17]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  Moving Beyond Active-Site Detection: MixMD Applied to Allosteric Systems. , 2016, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Reconciling NMR Structures of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein (NCp7) using Extensive Polarizable Force Field Free-Energy Simulations. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Allostery in Its Many Disguises: From Theory to Applications. , 2019, Structure.

[20]  Maxwell I. Zimmerman,et al.  Designing small molecules to target cryptic pockets yields both positive and negative allosteric modulators , 2017, PloS one.

[21]  J. Andrew McCammon,et al.  Mass and step length optimization for the calculation of equilibrium properties by molecular dynamics simulation , 1990 .

[22]  Omar N. A. Demerdash,et al.  Improvements to the AMOEBA Force Field by Introducing Anisotropic Atomic Polarizability of the Water Molecule. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[23]  R. Brüschweiler,et al.  Balanced amino-acid specific molecular dynamics force field for the realistic simulation of both folded and disordered proteins. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Mark E Tuckerman,et al.  Stochastic Neural Network Approach for Learning High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[25]  Gianni De Fabritiis,et al.  PlayMolecule CrypticScout: Predicting Protein Cryptic Sites Using Mixed-Solvent Molecular Simulations , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  Michael W Deem,et al.  Parallel tempering: theory, applications, and new perspectives. , 2005, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[27]  X. Daura,et al.  Reversible peptide folding in solution by molecular dynamics simulation. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  Colin A. Smith,et al.  Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  J M Masson,et al.  Alanine-stretch scanning mutagenesis: a simple and efficient method to probe protein structure and function. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[30]  Simon McIntosh-Smith,et al.  High performance in silico virtual drug screening on many-core processors , 2015, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl..

[31]  R. Efremov,et al.  Transmembrane Peptides as Inhibitors of Protein-Protein Interactions: An Efficient Strategy to Target Cancer Cells? , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[32]  Paul Robustelli,et al.  Development of a force field for the simulation of single-chain proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[33]  Robert Abel,et al.  Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations. , 2017, Accounts of chemical research.

[34]  Xiaoming Sun,et al.  Alanine-shaving Mutagenesis to Determine Key Interfacial Residues Governing the Assembly of a Nano-cage Maxi-ferritin*♦ , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[35]  R. Zwanzig High‐Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases , 1954 .

[36]  Enrico Guarnera,et al.  On the perturbation nature of allostery: sites, mutations, and signal modulation. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  F. Noé,et al.  Complete protein–protein association kinetics in atomic detail revealed by molecular dynamics simulations and Markov modelling , 2017, Nature Chemistry.

[38]  M. Cecchini,et al.  An intermediate along the recovery stroke of myosin VI revealed by X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Francesc Sabanés Zariquiey,et al.  Cosolvent Analysis Toolkit (CAT): a robust hotspot identification platform for cosolvent simulations of proteins to expand the druggable proteome , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Tai-Sung Lee,et al.  GPU-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics and Free Energy Methods in Amber18: Performance Enhancements and New Features , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[41]  Guohui Li,et al.  Higher Accuracy Achieved in the Simulations of Protein Structure Refinement, Protein Folding, and Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Using Polarizable Force Fields. , 2018, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[42]  Carlos H. M. Rodrigues,et al.  mCSM-PPI2: predicting the effects of mutations on protein–protein interactions , 2019, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Free Energy Perturbation Hamiltonian Replica-Exchange Molecular Dynamics (FEP/H-REMD) for Absolute Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[44]  Guohui Li,et al.  Accurate Evaluation of Ion Conductivity of the Gramicidin A Channel Using a Polarizable Force Field without Any Corrections. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[45]  Enrico Guarnera,et al.  Allosteric sites: remote control in regulation of protein activity. , 2016, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  J. Gumbart,et al.  Accelerating Membrane Simulations with Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[47]  V. Pande,et al.  Error analysis and efficient sampling in Markovian state models for molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[48]  P. Sexton,et al.  Probing the binding site of novel selective positive allosteric modulators at the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor , 2018, Biochemical pharmacology.

[49]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field. , 2015, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[50]  M. Smieško,et al.  Allosteric Binding Sites On Nuclear Receptors: Focus On Drug Efficacy and Selectivity , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[51]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  An Empirical Polarizable Force Field Based on the Classical Drude Oscillator Model: Development History and Recent Applications , 2016, Chemical reviews.

[52]  William Sinko,et al.  Improved Reweighting of Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Free Energy Calculation , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[53]  Markus Heinonen,et al.  Flex ddG: Rosetta ensemble-based estimation of changes in protein-protein binding affinity upon mutation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[54]  Haohao Fu,et al.  Extended Adaptive Biasing Force Algorithm. An On-the-Fly Implementation for Accurate Free-Energy Calculations. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[55]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: I parameterization and application to bulk organic liquid simulations , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[56]  Chun Wu,et al.  Convergence of replica exchange molecular dynamics. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[57]  M. Horrocks,et al.  A sticky situation: Aberrant protein-protein interactions in Parkinson's disease. , 2020, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[58]  H. Stern Molecular simulation with variable protonation states at constant pH. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[59]  Dawei Zhang,et al.  Incorporating Polarizability of Backbone Hydrogen Bonds Improved Folding of Short α-Helical Peptides. , 2019, Biophysical journal.

[60]  H. Hotelling Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[61]  J A McCammon,et al.  Theoretical calculation of relative binding affinity in host-guest systems. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Akinori Sarai,et al.  ProTherm and ProNIT: thermodynamic databases for proteins and protein–nucleic acid interactions , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[63]  G. Parisi,et al.  Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme , 1992, hep-lat/9205018.

[64]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Constant-pH Molecular Dynamics Simulations for Large Biomolecular Systems. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[66]  D. Kozakov,et al.  Improved Modeling of Peptide-Protein Binding Through Global Docking and Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2019, bioRxiv.

[67]  Michael J. Bodkin,et al.  Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules , 2015, Chemical science.

[68]  V. Gapsys,et al.  Accurate and Rigorous Prediction of the Changes in Protein Free Energies in a Large‐Scale Mutation Scan , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[69]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) simulations for fragment-based drug design. , 2015, Methods in molecular biology.

[70]  B. Roux,et al.  Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy from computer simulations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  Margaret E. Johnson,et al.  Current status of the AMOEBA polarizable force field. , 2010, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[72]  John Z. H. Zhang,et al.  Interaction Entropy for Computational Alanine Scanning , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[73]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Long-Time-Step Molecular Dynamics through Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[74]  Frank Noé,et al.  Time-lagged autoencoders: Deep learning of slow collective variables for molecular kinetics , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[75]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  ClusPro PeptiDock: efficient global docking of peptide recognition motifs using FFT , 2017, Bioinform..

[76]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics in NAMD , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[77]  Ivan Yu Torshin,et al.  Numeric analysis of reversibility of classic movement equations and constructive criteria of estimating quality of molecular dynamic simulations , 2020, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[78]  Mohammad M. Sultan,et al.  MSMBuilder: Statistical Models for Biomolecular Dynamics , 2016, bioRxiv.

[79]  Qinggang Zhang,et al.  Effect of electrostatic polarization and bridging water on CDK2-ligand binding affinities calculated using a highly efficient interaction entropy method. , 2017, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[80]  J. Gumbart,et al.  Folding free energy landscapes of β-sheets with non-polarizable and polarizable CHARMM force fields. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[81]  H. Gong,et al.  Simulating the Activation of Voltage Sensing Domain for a Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Using Polarizable Force Field. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[82]  Hongchun Li,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics is evolutionarily optimized to enable allosteric behavior. , 2019, Current opinion in structural biology.

[83]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[84]  Julien Michel,et al.  Reproducibility of Free Energy Calculations across Different Molecular Simulation Software Packages. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[85]  Wei Jiang,et al.  String method for Protein-Protein Binding Free Energy Calculations. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[86]  Heather A Carlson,et al.  MixMD Probeview: Robust Binding Site Prediction from Cosolvent Simulations , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[87]  J. H. Zhang,et al.  Correct folding of an α-helix and a β-hairpin using a polarized 2D torsional potential , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[88]  Yuan-Ling Xia,et al.  Insights into Protein–Ligand Interactions: Mechanisms, Models, and Methods , 2016, International journal of molecular sciences.

[89]  S. Takada,et al.  On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction , 2002 .

[90]  Johan Åqvist,et al.  Computational Prediction of Alanine Scanning and Ligand Binding Energetics in G-Protein Coupled Receptors , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[91]  David A. Pearlman,et al.  A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Free Energy Calculations , 1994 .

[92]  Joshua A. Rackers,et al.  An optimized charge penetration model for use with the AMOEBA force field. , 2016, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[93]  X. Barril,et al.  Molecular simulations with solvent competition quantify water displaceability and provide accurate interaction maps of protein binding sites. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[94]  Jianing Song,et al.  Interaction entropy for computational alanine scanning in protein–protein binding , 2018 .

[95]  John Z. H. Zhang,et al.  Interaction Entropy: A New Paradigm for Highly Efficient and Reliable Computation of Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[96]  Capturing the Flexibility of a Protein-Ligand Complex: Binding Free Energies from Different Enhanced Sampling Techniques. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[97]  Reconciling NMR Structures of the HIV-1 Nucleocapsid Protein (NCp7) using Extensive Polarizable Force Field Free-Energy Simulations. , 2020, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[98]  Grubmüller,et al.  Predicting slow structural transitions in macromolecular systems: Conformational flooding. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[99]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Multidimensional replica-exchange method for free-energy calculations , 2000, cond-mat/0009120.

[100]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  Molecular dynamics-guided discovery of an ago-allosteric modulator for GPR40/FFAR1 , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[101]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Everything you wanted to know about Markov State Models but were afraid to ask. , 2010, Methods.

[102]  Ronald M Levy,et al.  How kinetics within the unfolded state affects protein folding: an analysis based on markov state models and an ultra-long MD trajectory. , 2013, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[103]  Sotaro Fuchigami,et al.  Slow dynamics in protein fluctuations revealed by time-structure based independent component analysis: the case of domain motions. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[104]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[105]  Benjamin P. Cossins,et al.  Understanding Cryptic Pocket Formation in Protein Targets by Enhanced Sampling Simulations. , 2016, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[106]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  THE ROLE OF BONDED TERMS IN FREE ENERGY SIMULATIONS : 1. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[107]  Donghyuk Suh,et al.  A generalized linear response framework for expanded ensemble and replica exchange simulations. , 2018, The Journal of chemical physics.

[108]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  Capturing Many-Body Interactions with Classical Dipole Induction Models , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[109]  Andrew E. Torda,et al.  Local elevation: A method for improving the searching properties of molecular dynamics simulation , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[110]  B. VanSchouwen,et al.  Cracking the allosteric code of NMR chemical shifts , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[111]  A. Laio,et al.  Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[112]  Alessio Ciulli,et al.  NMR approaches in structure-based lead discovery: Recent developments and new frontiers for targeting multi-protein complexes , 2014, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[113]  J. H. Zhang,et al.  Computational Alanine Scanning with Interaction Entropy for Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energies. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[114]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  The Polarizable Atomic Multipole-based AMOEBA Force Field for Proteins. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[115]  K. Reuter,et al.  Benchmarks and Dielectric Constants for Reparametrized OPLS and Polarizable Force Field Models of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons. , 2017, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[116]  Frank Noé,et al.  PyEMMA 2: A Software Package for Estimation, Validation, and Analysis of Markov Models. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[117]  Dima Kozakov,et al.  Exploring the structural origins of cryptic sites on proteins , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[118]  Gail J. Bartlett,et al.  Predicting and Experimentally Validating Hot-Spot Residues at Protein–Protein Interfaces , 2019, ACS chemical biology.

[119]  Qiang Shao,et al.  From thermodynamics to kinetics: enhanced sampling of rare events. , 2015, Accounts of chemical research.

[120]  Albert C. Pan,et al.  Atomic-level characterization of protein–protein association , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[121]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Deciphering Cryptic Binding Sites on Proteins by Mixed-Solvent Molecular Dynamics , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[122]  Frank Noé,et al.  Machine learning for molecular simulation , 2019, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[123]  Michele Parrinello,et al.  Enhancing Important Fluctuations: Rare Events and Metadynamics from a Conceptual Viewpoint. , 2016, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[124]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[126]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  The Adaptive Biasing Force Method: Everything You Always Wanted To Know but Were Afraid To Ask , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[127]  Woody Sherman,et al.  Predicting Binding Affinities for GPCR Ligands Using Free-Energy Perturbation , 2016, ACS omega.

[128]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields , 2019, Chemical reviews.

[129]  Juan Fernández-Recio,et al.  SKEMPI 2.0: an updated benchmark of changes in protein–protein binding energy, kinetics and thermodynamics upon mutation , 2018, bioRxiv.

[130]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics. , 2014, Current opinion in structural biology.

[131]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[132]  Jacob D. Durrant,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations and drug discovery , 2011, BMC Biology.

[133]  Jason M. Swails,et al.  Constant pH Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics in Explicit Solvent Using Discrete Protonation States: Implementation, Testing, and Validation , 2014, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[134]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[135]  Eric Darve,et al.  Adaptive biasing force method for scalar and vector free energy calculations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[136]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Allostery: An Overview of Its History, Concepts, Methods, and Applications , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[137]  C. Sagui,et al.  Electrostatics interactions in classical simulations. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[138]  Ray Luo,et al.  Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations. 3. Polarizable water models conforming to Thole polarization screening schemes. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[139]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Strike a balance: Optimization of backbone torsion parameters of AMBER polarizable force field for simulations of proteins and peptides , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[140]  M Levitt,et al.  Molecular dynamics of native protein. II. Analysis and nature of motion. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[141]  Dading Huang,et al.  Computational analysis of hot spots and binding mechanism in the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction , 2019, RSC advances.

[142]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  Validation of Molecular Simulation: An Overview of Issues. , 2018, Angewandte Chemie.

[143]  J. Mongan,et al.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[144]  B. Brooks,et al.  An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms , 1988 .

[145]  Christophe Chipot,et al.  Efficient determination of protein-protein standard binding free energies from first principles. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[146]  Jie Li,et al.  Development of polarizable models for molecular mechanical calculations. 4. van der Waals parametrization. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[147]  Frank Noé,et al.  Markov models of molecular kinetics: generation and validation. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[148]  B. Berne,et al.  Replica exchange with solute scaling: a more efficient version of replica exchange with solute tempering (REST2). , 2011, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[149]  Xiaopeng Zhu,et al.  Alanine-Scanning Mutagenesis of α-Conotoxin GI Reveals the Residues Crucial for Activity at the Muscle Acetylcholine Receptor , 2018, Marine drugs.

[150]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[151]  David P. Anderson,et al.  High-Throughput All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Using Distributed Computing , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[152]  Markus Heinonen,et al.  Flex ddG: Rosetta ensemble-based estimation of changes in protein-protein binding affinity upon mutation , 2017, bioRxiv.

[153]  J. Kirkwood Statistical Mechanics of Fluid Mixtures , 1935 .