Challenges in management of the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1

Purpose of review The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 was pioneered by Claes Dohlman several decades ago. Since its inception, the device has undergone multiple revisions to address challenges associated with retroprosthetic membrane formation, retention, extrusion, stromal melt and endophthalmitis. Although visual outcomes and retention rates have improved, challenges, especially glaucoma, remain. Recent findings The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device has seen an increase in popularity because of the improvement in rates of retention and visual rehabilitation. Recent outcome studies have allowed clinicians to identify diagnoses and indications that can lead to more favorable results with the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device. Summary The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device continues to play a vital role in visual rehabilitation for eyes with very low chance of realistic allograft survival -- such as in eyes where corneal grafting is considered high-risk: eyes with corneal limbal stem cell failure, extensive deep corneal stromal neovascularization, and multiple allograft failures. This review article summarizes the perioperative and postoperative challenges, as well as other considerations associated with the device.

[1]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Mid-term prognosis of type I Boston keratoprosthesis reimplantation , 2020, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[2]  P. Enders,et al.  Device profile of the EYEMATE-IO™ system for intraocular pressure monitoring: overview of its safety and efficacy , 2020, Expert review of medical devices.

[3]  Priyanka Chhadva,et al.  Long-term outcomes of permanent keratoprosthesis. , 2019, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[4]  F. Yu,et al.  Outcomes of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis as the Primary Penetrating Corneal Procedure , 2018, Cornea.

[5]  Ashik Mohamed,et al.  Boston-keratoprosthesis for Idiopathic Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency , 2018, Ocular immunology and inflammation.

[6]  M. S. Cortina,et al.  Five year outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis as primary versus secondary penetrating corneal procedure in a matched case control study , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  F. Yu,et al.  Long-Term Visual Outcomes, Complications, and Retention of the Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2018, Cornea.

[8]  E. Holland,et al.  Intermediate-Term and Long-Term Outcomes With the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis in Aniridia , 2018, Cornea.

[9]  M. Nordlund,et al.  Incidence, Risk Factors, and Surgical Management of Boston Type 1 Keratoprothesis Corneal Melts, Leaks, and Extrusions , 2016, Cornea.

[10]  M. S. Cortina,et al.  Retroprosthetic Membrane Formation After Boston Keratoprosthesis: Is It Truly a Benign Complication? , 2016, Current Ophthalmology Reports.

[11]  J. Chodosh,et al.  Infections after keratoprosthesis , 2016, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[12]  M. S. Cortina,et al.  Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis from patient selection through postoperative management: a review for the keratoprosthetic surgeon , 2016, Clinical ophthalmology.

[13]  Sueko M Ng,et al.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis versus Repeat Donor Keratoplasty for Corneal Graft Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[14]  J. Chodosh,et al.  Primary Implantation of Type I Boston Keratoprosthesis in Nonautoimmune Corneal Diseases , 2015, Cornea.

[15]  M. Harissi-Dagher,et al.  Outcomes following Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis implantation in aniridia patients at the University of Montreal. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Michael W. Belin,et al.  Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[17]  N. Allemann,et al.  Retroprosthetic membrane and risk of sterile keratolysis in patients with type I Boston Keratoprosthesis. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[18]  S. Schwartz,et al.  POSTOPERATIVE POSTERIOR SEGMENT COMPLICATIONS IN EYES TREATED WITH THE BOSTON TYPE I KERATOPROSTHESIS , 2013, Retina.

[19]  J. Stein,et al.  Glaucoma Associated With Boston Type I Keratoprosthesis , 2012, Cornea.

[20]  M. Mannis,et al.  Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[21]  K. Colby,et al.  Expanding indications for the Boston keratoprosthesis , 2011, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[22]  N. Michaud,et al.  Characterization of retrokeratoprosthetic membranes in the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  F. C. Lam,et al.  The future of keratoprostheses (artificial corneae) , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[24]  T. Mcmahon,et al.  Special considerations for pars plana tube-shunt placement in Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[25]  Claes H Dohlman,et al.  Keratoprosthesis in Autoimmune Disease , 2010, Ocular immunology and inflammation.

[26]  E. Cohen,et al.  Boston Keratoprosthesis Outcomes and Complications , 2009, Cornea.

[27]  M. Durand,et al.  Successful Prevention of Bacterial Endophthalmitis in Eyes with the Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2009, Cornea.

[28]  I. Schwab,et al.  Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: The University of California Davis Experience , 2009, Cornea.

[29]  Rony R. Sayegh,et al.  The Boston keratoprosthesis in Stevens-Johnson syndrome. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  M. Durand,et al.  Fungal Colonization and Infection in Boston Keratoprosthesis , 2007, Cornea.

[31]  Danish M. Khan,et al.  Advances in Boston Keratoprosthesis: Enhancing Retention and Prevention of Infection and Inflammation , 2007, International ophthalmology clinics.

[32]  M. Belin,et al.  Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[33]  T. E. Hinds Diseases , 2021, Modeling Biological Systems.

[34]  Bonnie Salomon,et al.  Procedure , 2001, The Lancet.

[35]  M. Durand,et al.  Endophthalmitis after keratoprosthesis: incidence, bacterial causes, and risk factors. , 2001, Archives of ophthalmology.

[36]  M. Doane,et al.  Keratoprosthesis: Preoperative Prognostic Categories , 2001, Cornea.