Performance Analysis of Listed Companies in the UAE - Using DEA Malmquist Index Approach

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is becoming an increasingly popular tool for assessing the relative performance of industries and companies. By applying DEA theory to the non-financial sector, the relative efficiency of 27 listed corporations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been analyzed in this paper. The focus of the study has been on the impact of the financial crisis and the recovery thereafter. Further, the productivity change was decomposed into technical efficiency change and technological change by using the non-parametric Malmquist Productivity Index (MPI) over the period from 2007 to 2014. Based on Malmquist analysis, we find that the most efficient industries during the post-crisis period were food and beverages, telecommunication and pharmaceuticals. In contrast, the sectors that were adversely affected by the crisis were services, real estate, construction and cements. The break-up of the TFP indicated that the efficiency indices in the top performing industries were driven by technological improvements or frontier effects. The top-performing companies in the UAE during the 2007-14 period demonstrated innovation-led growth, aided by the use of better technology, investments in capital equipment, and adoption of new production processes.

[1]  Nizamettin Bayyurt,et al.  Performance Measurement of Turkish and Chinese Manufacturing Firms: A Comparative , 2008 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[3]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[4]  M. Farrell.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency , 1957 .

[5]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  Malmquist Indices of Productivity Growth during the Deregulation of Norwegian Banking, 1980-89 , 1992 .

[6]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency , 1997 .

[8]  A. Mimis,et al.  Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiency of Meat Products Industry: The Greek Case , 2011 .

[9]  Clifford Winston,et al.  Costs, Technology and Productivity in the U. S. Automobile Industry , 1983 .

[10]  S. Afriat.  Efficiency Estimation of Production Function , 1972 .

[11]  Gang Yu,et al.  An Illustrative Application of Idea (Imprecise Data Envelopment Analysis) to a Korean Mobile Telecommunication Company , 2001, Oper. Res..

[12]  Mieko Nishimizu.  Total Factor Productivity Growth, Technological Progress, and , 1982 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[14]  Marcelo Resende,et al.  Price cap regulation, incentives and quality:: The case of Brazilian telecommunications , 2004 .

[15]  SME Technical Efficiency And Its Correlates: Cross-National Evidence and Policy Implications , 2003 .

[16]  S. Malmquist.  Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[17]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Efficiency and Productivity of the Indian Pharmaceutical Firms: A Malmquist-Meta-Frontier Approach , 2009 .

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  Noel D. Uri,et al.  The effect of incentive regulation on productive efficiency in telecommunications , 2001 .

[20]  N. Kamaraj,et al.  Measurement of Relative Efficiency of State Owned Electric Utilities in INDIA Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2008 .

[21]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Productivity growth in Illinois electric utilities , 1990 .

[22]  E. Ghani,et al.  Technical Efficiency of Pakistan's Manufacturing Sector: A Stochastic Frontier and Data Envelopment Analysis , 2007 .

[23]  C. Timmer.  Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency , 1971, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Hsueh-Liang Wu,et al.  A DEA approach to understanding the performance of Taiwan’s steel industries 1970~1996 , 2005 .

[25]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[26]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measuring efficiencies and returns to scale of Nippon telegraph & telephone in production and cost analyses , 1997 .

[27]  Lennart Hjalmarsson,et al.  Productivity in Swedish Electricity Retail Distribution , 1992 .

[28]  Mieko Nishimizu.  Total factor productivity growth, technological progress and technical efficiency change : dimensions of productivity change in Yugoslavia, 1965-1978 , 1982 .

[29]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches , 1998, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  N. Uri.  Technical efficiency, allocative efficiency, and the impact of incentive regulation in telecommunications in the United States , 2001 .

[31]  Haritha Saranga,et al.  Determinants of operational efficiencies in the Indian pharmaceutical industry , 2009, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[32]  Catherine Waddams Price,et al.  Malmquist indices of productivity change in the UK gas industry before and after privatization , 1996 .

[33]  Minwir Al-Shammari,et al.  A multi‐criteria data envelopment analysis model for measuring the productive efficiency of hospitals , 1999 .