Short-term (≈600 ms) prediction of perturbation dynamics for 10- and 20-Hz MEG rhythms in human primary sensorimotor hand cortices

Abstract The pericentral primary sensorimotor cortices generate the ‘mu rhythm’ with a distinct spectral signature exhibiting two peaks, generated predominantly anterior (20 Hz) or posterior (10 Hz) to the central sulcus; it defines a ‘background’ network state upon which somatosensory inputs will impinge. We used the high spatiotemporal resolution of magnetoencephalography to analyze the perturbation dynamics of these cortical rhythms in response to a series of paired electric median nerve stimuli: single trials were sorted off-line according to increasing power of the 10- or 20-Hz rebounds which occurred 300–600 ms after the first stimulus; using subaverages formed from the upper and lower 20% of this distribution, we analyzed somatosensory evoked fields (SEF) and power modifications caused by the second stimulus in the pair. We report three key findings: (1) the power level of rhythm rebounds triggered by the first stimulus predicted the rebound strength after the second stimulus applied 600 ms later; yet, it was uncorrelated across the 2.4-s interval separating subsequent stimulus pairs. (2) Conventional averaging camouflages substantial trial-to-trial variations of rhythm dynamics including, for example, even non-occurrences of rhythm rebounds. (3) For six of the seven subjects, the background rhythm power did not affect any SEF component; for the subject with the strongest rhythms only intracortically generated deflections (peaking after the thalamocortical input component N20m) varied as function of pre-stimulus 10- or 20-Hz power. Thus, the perturbation dynamics of the pericentral mu rhythm exhibits a significant intertrial variance, which becomes effective mainly at a time scale larger than 600 ms.

[1]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[2]  A. Romani,et al.  Prestimulus spectral EEG patterns and the evoked auditory vertex response. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Interhemispheric phase synchrony and amplitude correlation of spontaneous beta oscillations in human subjects: a magnetoencephalographic study , 2001, Neuroreport.

[5]  R. Hari,et al.  Characterization of spontaneous MEG rhythms in healthy adults. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Hari,et al.  Functional Organization of the Human First and Second Somatosensory Cortices: a Neuromagnetic Study , 1993, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields: relation to pre-stimulus mu rhythm , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[9]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Cellular and network mechanisms of rhythmic recurrent activity in neocortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Basar,et al.  Enhancement of visual evoked potentials by stimulation during low prestimulus EEG stages. , 1993, The International journal of neuroscience.

[11]  V. Jousmäki,et al.  Modulation of Human Cortical Rolandic Rhythms during Natural Sensorimotor Tasks , 1997, NeuroImage.

[12]  Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Dynamics of mu-rhythm suppression caused by median nerve stimulation: a magnetoencephalographic study in human subjects , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[13]  M. Brandt,et al.  Pre-stimulus spectral EEG patterns and the visual evoked response. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  H. Gastaut [Electrocorticographic study of the reactivity of rolandic rhythm]. , 1952, Revue neurologique.

[15]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  Evaluation of event-related desynchronization (ERD) preceding and following voluntary self-paced movement. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  H. Berger Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des Menschen , 1929, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[17]  H. Jasper,et al.  Electrocorticograms in man: Effect of voluntary movement upon the electrical activity of the precentral gyrus , 1949 .

[18]  R. Hari,et al.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of sensorimotor neuromagnetic rhythms related to thumb movement , 1994, Neuroscience.