Probabilistic Graphical Models of Fundamental Diagram Parameters for Simulations of Freeway Traffic

Freeway traffic simulations must account for the probabilistic nature of model parameters to capture observed variations in traffic behavior. Fundamental diagrams specify freeway section parameters describing the flow–density relationship in macroscopic simulation models. A triangular fundamental diagram—specified with the free-flow speed, congestion wave speed, and capacity—is commonly adopted in first-order cell transmission models. Capacity (defined as the maximum flow observed in a given freeway section over a particular day) exhibits significant day-today variation, and capacity variations across different sections of the freeway are significantly correlated. Free-flow speeds do not exhibit significant variation, but congestion wave speeds exhibit variation uncorrelated with section capacities or parameters from other sections. A probabilistic graphical approach is presented to model the probabilistic distribution of fundamental diagram parameters of an entire freeway section chosen for simulation. More than 1 year of data from dozens of loop detectors along a 25-mi section of the I-210 freeway westbound in Los Angeles, California, are used for demonstration. The parameters of the distribution are estimated with the expectation–maximization algorithm to account for missing observations. Model selection from among plausible models indicates that a first-order spatial Markov model is appropriate to capture the capacity distribution, which is the joint probability distribution of freeway section capacities. Stochastic simulations with sampled parameters demonstrate that capacity variations can lead to significant variations in congestion patterns and freeway performance.

[1]  Lily Elefteriadou,et al.  Revisiting the Definition and Measurement of Capacity , 2006 .

[2]  Michael J. Cassidy,et al.  Relation between traffic density and capacity drop at three freeway bottlenecks , 2007 .

[3]  C. Daganzo THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL.. , 1994 .

[4]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Freeway traffic flow simulation using the Link Node Cell transmission model , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[5]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[6]  Abishai Polus,et al.  Stochastic nature of freeway capacity and its estimation , 2002 .

[7]  Hein Botma,et al.  Assessment of Roadway Capacity Estimation Methods , 1996 .

[8]  David E. Booth,et al.  Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data , 2000, Technometrics.

[9]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  A Comparative Methodology for Estimating the Capacity of a Freeway Section , 2007, 2007 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference.

[10]  Xinkai Wu,et al.  Stochasticity of freeway operational capacity and chance-constrained ramp metering , 2010 .

[11]  M. Cassidy,et al.  Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks , 1999 .

[12]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Imputation of Ramp Flow Data for Freeway Traffic Simulation , 2009 .

[13]  James H Banks Review of Empirical Research on Congested Freeway Flow , 2002 .

[14]  Werner Brilon,et al.  Reliability of Freeway Traffic Flow: A Stochastic Concept of Capacity , 2005 .

[15]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  FREEWAY CAPACITY DROP AND THE DEFINITION OF CAPACITY , 1991 .

[16]  Jaimyoung Kwon,et al.  Automatic Calibration of the Fundamental Diagram and Empirical Observations on Capacity , 2009 .