3D Printing of Intracranial Aneurysms Using Fused Deposition Modeling Offers Highly Accurate Replications

The authors evaluated fused deposition modeling for the production of aneurysm models replicating patient-specific anatomy using 3D rotational angiographic data from 10 patients. A hollow model with connectors for silicone tubes was fabricated by using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, the support material was then dissolved, and the surfaces finished by using NanoSeal. The models were filled with iodinated contrast and 3D rotational angiography was performed. Reproduction of hollow aneurysm models was technically feasible in 8 of 10 cases, and a high level of anatomic accuracy was observed. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: As part of a multicenter cooperation (Aneurysm-Like Synthetic bodies for Testing Endovascular devices in 3D Reality) with focus on implementation of additive manufacturing in neuroradiologic practice, we systematically assessed the technical feasibility and accuracy of several additive manufacturing techniques. We evaluated the method of fused deposition modeling for the production of aneurysm models replicating patient-specific anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D rotational angiographic data from 10 aneurysms were processed to obtain volumetric models suitable for fused deposition modeling. A hollow aneurysm model with connectors for silicone tubes was fabricated by using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene. Support material was dissolved, and surfaces were finished by using NanoSeal. The resulting models were filled with iodinated contrast media. 3D rotational angiography of the models was acquired, and aneurysm geometry was compared with the original patient data. RESULTS: Reproduction of hollow aneurysm models was technically feasible in 8 of 10 cases, with aneurysm sizes ranging from 41 to 2928 mm3 (aneurysm diameter, 3–19 mm). A high level of anatomic accuracy was observed, with a mean Dice index of 93.6% ± 2.4%. Obstructions were encountered in vessel segments of <1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Fused deposition modeling is a promising technique, which allows rapid and precise replication of cerebral aneurysms. The porosity of the models can be overcome by surface finishing. Models produced with fused deposition modeling may serve as educational and research tools and could be used to individualize treatment planning.

[1]  J. Chaloupka,et al.  Simulation of endovascular neurointervention using silicone models: imaging and manipulation. , 2005, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[2]  C. Kerber,et al.  Rapid prototyping to create vascular replicas from CT scan data: Making tools to teach, rehearse, and choose treatment strategies , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  K. Lovblad,et al.  From patient to model: stereolithographic modeling of the cerebral vasculature based on rotational angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  A. Wakhloo,et al.  Neurovascular Modeling: Small-Batch Manufacturing of Silicone Vascular Replicas , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Role of virtual reality simulation in teaching and assessing technical skills in endovascular intervention. , 2010, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[6]  Tim Caffrey,et al.  Wohlers report 2013 : additive manufacturing and 3D printing state of the industry : annual worldwide progress report , 2013 .

[7]  David F. Kallmes,et al.  Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters: A Meta-Analysis , 2013, Stroke.

[8]  Kenichi Kono,et al.  Preoperative simulations of endovascular treatment for a cerebral aneurysm using a patient-specific vascular silicone model. , 2013, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[9]  A. Valavanis,et al.  Silicone models as basic training and research aid in endovascular neurointervention—a single-center experience and review of the literature , 2014, Neurosurgical Review.

[10]  Jukka Tuomi,et al.  Part 5: Global Reports, Europe, Finland. Wohlers Report, 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing: State of the Industry, Annual Worldwide Progress Report , 2014 .

[11]  M. Glucksberg,et al.  Force characterization of intracranial endovascular embolization: coil type, microcatheter placement, and insertion rate. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[12]  J. Gauvrit,et al.  WEB Intrasaccular Flow Disruptor—Prospective, Multicenter Experience in 83 Patients with 85 Aneurysms , 2014, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .