Reflexivity and Learning in System Innovation Processes

In-depth insight into the relationship between reflexivity, learning and reflection is needed to enrich governance approaches for persistent sustainability issues. However, current conceptualisations of reflexivity seem limited for the understanding of system innovation processes – reflexivity remains highly abstract and often gets conflated with reflection, and, by extension, learning. In this article, we critique the concepts reflexivity and learning and then present an exploratory case-study of greenhouse vegetable production in the Netherlands to examine their relations. Results suggest a shifting compatibility between initiative and context – reflexivity alignment: the extent to which an innovation initiative shares an orientation towards structural change with its institutional setting. Furthermore, learning sometimes appeared to increase reflexivity, as often assumed, but we found evidence of the opposite as well – reflexivity changes preceding learning. Synthesising the results, we posit three archetypal modes that describe the relation between learning in and reflexivity of a system innovation initiative.

[1]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Transition pathways revisited: Established firms as multi-level actors in the heavy vehicle industry , 2015 .

[2]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Anchoring of innovations: Assessing Dutch efforts to harvest energy from glasshouses , 2012 .

[3]  Tom Veldkamp,et al.  Social learning inside and outside transition projects: Playing free jazz for a heavy metal audience , 2014 .

[4]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  The Importance of Social Learning in Restoring the Multifunctionality of Rivers and Floodplains , 2006 .

[5]  J. Ingram,et al.  Interactions between Niche and Regime: An Analysis of Learning and Innovation Networks for Sustainable Agriculture across Europe , 2015 .

[6]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[7]  Barbara J. Regeer,et al.  Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development , 2009 .

[8]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Future sustainability and images , 2010 .

[9]  G. Seyfang,et al.  Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda , 2007 .

[10]  Rebekah R. Brown,et al.  Governance experimentation and factors of success in socio-technical transitions in the urban water sector , 2012 .

[11]  A. Wals,et al.  Education for Integrated Rural Development: transformative learning in a complex and uncertain world , 2004 .

[12]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[13]  M. Lynch Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge , 2000 .

[14]  John Grin,et al.  Contextualizing Reflexive Governance: the Politics of Dutch Transitions to Sustainability , 2007 .

[15]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  The need for reflexive evaluation approaches in development cooperation , 2015 .

[16]  U. Beck,et al.  The Theory of Reflexive Modernization , 2003 .

[17]  Art Dewulf,et al.  Issue Framing in Conversations for Change , 2012 .

[18]  U. Jørgensen Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development , 2012 .

[19]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Dynamics in socio-technical systems : typology of change processes and contrasting case studies , 2007 .

[20]  C Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Integrated management of natural resources: dealing with ambiguous issues, multiple actors and diverging frames. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  V. Gilsing,et al.  A system failure framework for innovation policy design , 2005 .

[22]  Barbara van Mierlo,et al.  Toward an Integrative Perspective on Social Learning in System Innovation , 2016 .

[23]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems , 2011 .

[24]  D. Wildemeersch,et al.  Navigating the tides of change: revisiting the notion of reflexivity in the context of social learning for transboundary collective experimentation , 2011 .

[25]  T. Steelman U.S. wildfire governance as social-ecological problem , 2016 .

[26]  Cees Leeuwis,et al.  Enhancing the Reflexivity of System Innovation Projects With System Analyses , 2010 .

[27]  Adrian Smith Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[28]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[29]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: Comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973–2004) , 2010 .

[30]  B. V. Mierlo,et al.  Communicating tensions among incumbents about system innovation in the Dutch dairy sector , 2016 .

[31]  B. V. Mierlo,et al.  Encouraging system learning in two poultry subsectors , 2013 .

[32]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[33]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Learning towards system innovation. Evaluating a systemic instrument , 2010 .