Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework

This paper presents a set of multi-gas mitigation scenarios that aim for stabilisation of greenhouse gas radiative forcing in 2150 at levels from 3.7 to 5.3 W/m2. At the moment, non-CO2 gasses (methane, nitrous oxide, PFCs, HFCs and SF6) contribute to about a quarter of the global emissions. The analysis shows that including these non-CO2 gases in mitigation analysis is crucial in formulating a cost-effective response. For stabilisation at 4.5 W/m2, a multi-gas approach leads to 40% lower costs than an approach that would focus at CO2only. Within the assumptions used in this study, the non-CO2 gasses contribution to total reduction is very large under less stringent targets (up to 60%), but declines under stringent targets. While stabilising at 3.7 W/m2 obviously leads to larger environmental benefits than the 4.5 W/m2 case (temperature increase in 2100 are 1.9 and 2.3oC, respectively), the costs of the lower target are higher (0.80% and 0.34% of GDP in 2100, respectively). Improving knowledge on how future reduction potential for non-CO2 gasses could develop is shown to be a crucial research question.

[1]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Marginal Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 1999 .

[2]  A. Bouwman,et al.  A global high‐resolution emission inventory for ammonia , 1997 .

[3]  C. N. Hewitt,et al.  A global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions , 1995 .

[4]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Global, Regional and national Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation , 2001 .

[5]  Elizabeth A. Scheehle and Dina Kruger.  Global Anthropogenic Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions , 2006 .

[6]  Lee Schipper,et al.  The evolution of carbon dioxide emissions from energy use in industrialized countries: an end-use analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Vries B de,et al.  Projections of multi-gas emissions and carbon sinks,and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land-use related sources , 2003 .

[8]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean / atmosphere / land analyses , 1994 .

[9]  M. Keller,et al.  Fertilizer-induced nitric oxide emissions from agricultural soils , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[10]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Metrics of Climate Change: Assessing Radiative Forcing and Emission Indices , 2003 .

[11]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[12]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission mitigation scenarios and implications , 2001 .

[13]  Jochen Harnisch,et al.  Estimating Future Emissions and Potential Reductions of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 , 2006 .

[14]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  A multi-gas abatement analysis of the Kyoto Protocol , 2005 .

[15]  E. Matthews,et al.  Global analysis of the potential for N2O production in natural soils , 1993 .

[16]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[18]  B. Metz.  IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[19]  T. Wigley,et al.  Could reducing fossil-fuel emissions cause global warming? , 1991, Nature.

[20]  Mnv,et al.  The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios; A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century , 2001 .

[21]  Patrick Criqui,et al.  World energy projections to 2030 , 2000 .

[22]  J. Alcamo,et al.  Global modelling of environmental change : an overview of IMAGE 2.1 , 1998 .

[23]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[24]  J. Fuglestvedt,et al.  The adequacy of GWPs as indicators of damage costsincurred by global warming , 2002 .

[25]  A. Bouwman,et al.  Computing land use emissions of greenhouse gases , 1994 .

[26]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[27]  Malte Meinshausen,et al.  What does a 2 degree C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? - A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. Chapter 28 , 2006 .

[28]  Paul L. Lucas,et al.  The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments , 2005 .

[29]  M. Collins,et al.  Projections of future climate change , 2002 .

[30]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Mitigation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Waste, Energy and Industry , 2006 .

[31]  Tsuneyuki Morita,et al.  Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment , 2002 .

[32]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes Comparison of variants of the Multi-stage and Per Capita Convergence regimes , 2003 .

[33]  M. Hoogwijk.  On the global and regional potential of renewable energy sources , 2004 .

[34]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes , 2005 .

[35]  J. Berdowski,et al.  The climate system , 2001 .

[36]  Joanna Isobel House,et al.  Climate change 2001 : synthesis report , 2001 .

[37]  K. Shine.  Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[38]  Christian Azar,et al.  The Cost of Using Global Warming Potentials: Analysing the Trade off Between CO2, CH4 and N2O , 2006 .

[39]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[40]  H. Neue.  Fluxes of methane from rice fields and potential for mitigation , 1997 .

[41]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Analysis of post-Kyoto CO₂ emissions trading using marginal abatement curves , 1998 .

[42]  Kmd,et al.  FAIR 2.0 - A decision-support tool to assess theenvironmental and economic consequences of future climate regimes , 2003 .

[43]  Pekka E. Kauppi,et al.  Technological and Economic Potential of Options to Enhance , Maintain , and Manage Biological Carbon Reservoirs and Geoengineering , 2022 .

[44]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Costs of Multigreenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for the USA , 1999, Science.

[45]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  A global inventory of nitric oxide emissions from soils , 2004, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[46]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[47]  J. Fenhann.  Industrial Non-Energy, Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions , 2000 .

[48]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Responses to technology and taxes in a simulated world , 2004 .

[49]  Brian C. O'Neill.  Economics, Natural Science, and the Costs of Global Warming Potentials , 2003 .

[50]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases , 2007 .

[51]  R. Beach,et al.  Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture , 2006 .

[52]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  Multi-gas emission profiles for stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations: Emission implications of limiting global temperature increase to 2 degrees centigrade , 2004 .