Academics' resistance to summative peer review of teaching: questionable rewards and the importance of student evaluations

This study draws from 30 semi-structured interviews with tenure-track faculty members in a research-intensive university to examine their lack of engagement in the summative peer review of teaching. Findings indicate that most academics in the study do not think peer review outcomes contribute meaningfully to decisions about career advancement and believe that, in comparison, student evaluation of teaching scores matter more. The findings suggest that faculty member resistance to summative peer reviews will persist unless academics are confident that the results will be seriously considered in decisions about tenure and promotion. This article also contends that senior administrators should provide further clarity about the purpose and use of peer review outcomes in high-stakes career decisions.

[1]  Maria J. Mayan,et al.  Essentials of Qualitative Inquiry , 2009 .

[2]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[3]  D. Atkinson,et al.  Using teaching observations to reflect upon and improve teaching practice in higher education , 2010 .

[4]  Vicki K. Carter.  Five Steps to Becoming a Better Peer Reviewer , 2008 .

[5]  Simon Lygo-Baker,et al.  Teaching Observations: A Meeting of Minds? , 2006 .

[6]  Sharon Flynn,et al.  Toward a Summative System for the Assessment of Teaching Quality in Higher Education. , 2009 .

[7]  Charles R. Emery,et al.  Return to academic standards: a critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness , 2003 .

[8]  P. Hutchings,et al.  The peer review of teaching: Progress, issues and prospects , 1996 .

[9]  Susan Shortland,et al.  Peer observation: a tool for staff development or compliance? , 2004 .

[10]  Susan Shortland.  Feedback within peer observation: continuing professional development and unexpected consequences , 2010 .

[11]  W. Tierney.  Organizational Socialization in Higher Education , 1997 .

[12]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: an action research approach , 2008, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[13]  J. H. Schuster,et al.  The American Faculty: The Restructuring of Academic Work and Careers , 2008 .

[14]  Deborah Peel,et al.  Peer observation as a transformatory tool?1 , 2005 .

[15]  T. Barrett,et al.  Using observation of teaching to improve quality: finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions , 2007 .

[16]  T. Roxå,et al.  Significant conversations and significant networks – exploring the backstage of the teaching arena , 2009 .

[17]  Kerryann O'Meara,et al.  Inside the Panopticon: Studying Academic Reward Systems , 2011 .

[18]  Denise Chalmers,et al.  Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the Scholarship of Teaching in higher education , 2011 .

[19]  “Great classroom teaching” and more , 2006 .

[20]  M. Brenner.  Interviewing in Educational Research , 2006 .

[21]  J. Byrne,et al.  Peer development as an alternative to peer observation: a tool to enhance professional development , 2010 .

[22]  Ann E. Austin,et al.  Rethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education's Strategic Imperative , 2007 .

[23]  Gill Nicholls,et al.  Enhancing Teaching Quality Through Peer Review of Teaching , 2005 .

[24]  David S. Ackerman,et al.  Peer Observation Reports and Student Evaluations of Teaching: Who Are the Experts?. , 2009 .

[25]  L. Fink.  1: Evaluating Teaching: A New Approach to an Old Problem , 2008 .

[26]  Gary F. Kohut,et al.  Evidence of Effective Teaching: Perceptions of Peer Reviewers , 2002 .

[27]  J. C. Ory,et al.  Teaching Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future , 2000 .

[28]  K. O’Meara.  Encouraging Multiple Forms of Scholarship in Faculty Reward Systems: Have Academic Cultures Really Changed?. , 2006 .

[29]  P. Orsmond,et al.  Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? , 2004 .

[30]  Paul Trout,et al.  Flunking the Test: The Dismal Record of Student Evaluations. , 2000 .

[31]  D. Pratt,et al.  Through What Perspective Do We Judge the Teaching of Peers , 2008 .

[32]  A. Link,et al.  A Time Allocation Study of University Faculty. , 2008 .

[33]  Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation , 2011 .

[34]  Clare Kell,et al.  Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy‐holding complacency? , 2009 .

[35]  L. Hodges,et al.  Translating Comments on Student Evaluations into the Language of Learning , 2006 .

[36]  J. Fairweather.  The Ultimate Faculty Evaluation: Promotion and Tenure Decisions , 2002 .

[37]  Abby L. Ferber,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Evaluation of Teaching: What We Know and What We Can Do , 2007 .