Pulsed plasma thruster performance for miniaturised electrode configurations and low energy operation

A one-dimensional electromechanical model based on accurate calculations of inductance and a detailed description of the inhomogeneous magnetic field distribution which accelerates the plasma discharge produced by a miniaturised pulsed plasma thruster (μPPT)(μPPT) has been developed. The analytical model relates μPPTμPPT performance to electrode geometry parameters and circuit parameters and shows good agreement with experimental results. The theoretical study has shown that flared electrode geometries enhance performance by optimising the inductance gradient and hence the energy available to accelerate the plasma sheet. Thruster performance has been experimentally characterised for a discharge energy range of 1–8 J for propellant surface areas of 0.15–1.5 cm2. The performance of parallel electrode configurations has been shown to display a strong dependence on aspect ratio relative to that of flared geometries. Rectangular flared electrodes produce impulse bits considerably higher than parallel geometries under the same operating conditions. Results show that for configurations where aspect ratio may influence performance increases in electrode separation rather than decreases in electrode width produce enhanced performance for the same propellant surface area.

[1]  David Krejci,et al.  Development of a μPPT for CubeSat applications , 2008 .

[2]  W. C. Condit,et al.  Electromechanical railgun model , 1991 .

[3]  Helmut Kurtz,et al.  Pulsed Plasma Thrusters for Primary Propulsion and Attitude Control of a Small All Electrical Satellite , 2004 .

[4]  Michael A. Demetriou,et al.  Electromechanical Modeling of Applied Field Micro Pulsed Plasma Thrusters , 2005 .

[5]  M. Martinez-Sanchez,et al.  Spacecraft Electric Propulsion—An Overview , 1998 .

[6]  W. J. Guman,et al.  Effects of Propellant and Electrode Geometry on Pulsed Ablative Plasma Thruster Performance , 1975 .

[7]  Sergio A. Elaskar,et al.  Zero-Dimensional Model for Preliminary Design of Ablative Pulsed Plasma Teflon Thrusters , 2004 .

[8]  Frederick Warren Grover,et al.  Inductance Calculations: Working Formulas and Tables , 1981 .

[9]  Andre Koch Torres Assis,et al.  Equivalence between the formulas for inductance calculation , 1997 .

[10]  P. Turchi,et al.  Pulsed Plasma Thruster , 1998 .

[11]  Roger M. Myers,et al.  Pulsed plasma thrusters for small spacecraft attitude control , 1996 .

[12]  Monika Auweter-Kurtz,et al.  Investigation of the Magnetic Field in a Pulsed Plasma Thruster , 2008 .

[13]  Gregory G. Spanjers,et al.  AFRL MicroPPT Development for Small Spacecraft Propulsion , 2002 .

[14]  S. J. Pottinger,et al.  Micro Pulsed Plasma Thruster Development , 2007 .

[15]  W. Guman Pulsed plasma propulsion system studies , 1970 .

[16]  Mark Campbell,et al.  Pulsed Plasma Thruster System for Microsatellites , 2005 .

[17]  R. Jahn,et al.  Physics of Electric Propulsion , 1968 .

[18]  M. Bueno,et al.  A new method for inductance calculations , 1995 .

[19]  Scott W. Benson,et al.  Advanced Pulsed Plasma Thruster Electrical Components , 2001 .

[20]  Eric Pencil,et al.  Performance Evaluation of A High Energy Pulsed Plasma Thruster II , 2005 .

[21]  Eric Pencil,et al.  A Performance Comparison of Pulsed Plasma Thruster Electrode Configurations , 1997 .

[22]  Eric Pencil,et al.  Evaluation of pulsed plasma thruster electrical components , 2001 .

[23]  R Albertoni,et al.  Thrust efficiency optimization of the pulsed plasma thruster SIMP-LEX , 2010 .

[24]  W. J. Guman Designing solid propellant pulsed plasma thrusters , 1975 .

[25]  Victor Kowalenko ERRATUM: A study of the equations of motion for a plasma-armature railgun , 1997 .