Left parietal cortex is modulated by amount of recollected verbal information

In two earlier experiments, we reported that left parietal cortex activity covaried with the amount of pictorial information recollected. The present experiment addressed the question whether our earlier results would generalize to verbal materials. Participants studied a series of word pairs and were then tested on individual old and new words in a modified remember/know task. In this task, participants were required to indicate whether recollection was accompanied by retrieval of study pairmates or not. As before, we operationally defined ‘amount recollected’ as the contrast between these two types of remember response. We found that the same left parietal region previously identified as sensitive to amount of recollected pictorial information is also sensitive to amount of recollected verbal information.

[1]  David I. Donaldson,et al.  Remember the Source: Dissociating Frontal and Parietal Contributions to Episodic Memory , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Functional significance of retrieval‐related activity in lateral parietal cortex: Evidence from fMRI and ERPs , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[3]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  An investigation of the effects of relative probability of old and new test items on the neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful source memory , 2009, NeuroImage.

[4]  Klostermann Wallace,et al.  The role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2009 .

[5]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  The parietal cortex and episodic memory: an attentional account , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Moscovitch,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attention to memory: A hypothesis (AtoM) on the role of the posterior parietal cortex in memory retrieval , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Roberto Cabeza,et al.  Role of parietal regions in episodic memory retrieval: The dual attentional processes hypothesis , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  Kaia L. Vilberg,et al.  Memory retrieval and the parietal cortex: A review of evidence from a dual-process perspective , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Dissociation of the neural correlates of recognition memory according to familiarity, recollection, and amount of recollected information , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Elisabeth J. Ploran,et al.  Evidence Accumulation and the Moment of Recognition: Dissociating Perceptual Recognition Processes Using fMRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[12]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  M. Rugg,et al.  Separating the Brain Regions Involved in Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A Population-Average, Landmark- and Surface-based (PALS) atlas of human cerebral cortex. , 2005, NeuroImage.

[15]  David C. Van Essen,et al.  Windows on the brain: the emerging role of atlases and databases in neuroscience , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[17]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Windows on the brain: the emerging role of atlases and databases in neuroscience , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[18]  A. Baddeley The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  T. Shallice,et al.  Recollection and Familiarity in Recognition Memory: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  A Parametric Study of Prefrontal Cortex Involvement in Human Working Memory , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.