Team Climate and Media Choice in Virtual Teams

As work teams become more distributed, effective computer-mediated communication is increasingly impacting their performance. This study investigates how team climate influences communication frequency among team members and their use of different communication media. Data were collected in two information systems courses offered at an Austrian university in which 50 student teams developed web-based applications and conducted usability tests. A team climate framework based on task and social orientation was used to assess the teams’ performance and communication patterns. We found that both task and social dimensions of team climate were positively related to higher communication frequency as well as objective and subjective performance. Among other things, the results suggest that a task-oriented climate is especially linked to the use of e-mail, while social orientation is linked to the use of face-to-face meetings. We also found differences in communication patterns and performance across four different types of team climates (fully functioning, cozy, cold, and dysfunctional). The results underscore the importance of both task and social dimensions for a team to perform well. Our study contributes to both the academic literature that investigates factors affecting media choice and the practitioner literature that examines how to manage virtual teamwork effectively.

[1]  Joseph E. McGrath Small group research , 1966 .

[2]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[3]  P. Moyers,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2007, Occupational therapy in health care.

[4]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[5]  Ulla K. Bunz,et al.  The rules of virtual groups: Trust, liking, and performance in computer-mediated communication , 2005 .

[6]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[7]  A. Sivunen,et al.  Team leaders' technology choice in virtual teams , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[8]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Team Reflexivity in Innovative Projects , 2006 .

[9]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[10]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Virtual teams in and out of synchronicity , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[12]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Media Appropriateness in the Conduct and Discovery of Deceptive Communication: The Relative Influence of Richness and Synchronicity , 2004 .

[13]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance , 2001 .

[14]  Giles Hirst,et al.  A Model of R&D Leadership and Team Communication: The Relationship with Project Performance , 2004 .

[15]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Outcomes from Conduct of Virtual Teams at Two Sites: Support for Media Synchronicity Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[16]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Decision making performance of interacting groups: an experimental investigation of the effects of task type and communication mode , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  Massimo Magni,et al.  IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  Ekkehart Frieling,et al.  Der Fragebogen zur Arbeit im Team (F-A-T) , 2001 .

[20]  A. Zander,et al.  Group dynamics, research and theory , 1955 .

[21]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Project characteristics and group communication: an investigation , 2002 .

[22]  Linda Chapman,et al.  Effective teamwork. , 2008, Nursing management.

[23]  France Bélanger,et al.  Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals , 2006 .

[24]  Connie E. Wells Teaching Teamwork in Information Systems , 2002 .

[25]  Bouchaib Bahli,et al.  Journal of Information Technology Education Group Performance in Information Systems Project Groups: an Empirical Study Group Performance in Information Systems Project Groups , 2022 .

[26]  Elena Rocco,et al.  Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact , 1998, CHI.

[27]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Group decision making and communication technology , 1992 .

[28]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[29]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[30]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[31]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  Vicente González-Romá,et al.  The influence of intra‐team conflict on work teams' affective climate: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[33]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  J. Walther Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[35]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Virtual team collaboration: building shared meaning, resolving breakdowns and creating translucence , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  Gerald M. Phillips,et al.  Teaching group discussion via computer‐mediated communication , 1989 .

[37]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[38]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[39]  N. Kock,et al.  Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior toward E-communication tools , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[40]  Tammie D. Hertel,et al.  Team size and technology fit: participation, Awareness,and rapport in distributed teams , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[41]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[42]  M. West Reflexivity and work group effectiveness:a conceptual integration , 1996 .

[43]  David G. Mathiasen Groups that work (and those that Don't): Creating Conditions for Effective Teamwork, edited by J. Richard Hackman. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass 1990, 512 pp. Price: $39.95 cloth , 1991 .

[44]  Thomas Köhler,et al.  Kommunikation im Internet , 1999 .

[45]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  Patterns of Aggressive Behavior in Experimentally Created “Social Climates” , 1939 .

[46]  A. Tenbrunsel,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2013 .

[47]  M. Körner Interprofessional teamwork in medical rehabilitation: a comparison of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary team approach , 2010, Clinical rehabilitation.

[48]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus , 2001, MIS Q..

[49]  Vicente González-Romá,et al.  Team climate, climate strength and team performance. A longitudinal study , 2009 .

[50]  C. Saunders,et al.  “Is It Already 4 a.m. in Your Time Zone?” , 2007 .

[51]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Rethinking media richness: towards a theory of media synchronicity , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[52]  Eli B. Cohen,et al.  Challenges of information technology education in the 21st century , 2001 .

[53]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction styles: assessment and effects , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[54]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[55]  Kathrin Figl Media Choice in Students’ Communication , 2007 .

[56]  Anthony Giddens Group Dynamics Research and Theory (Third Edition) , 1969 .

[57]  Robert Loo,et al.  Assessing “team climate” in project teams , 2003 .

[58]  Paul F. Finnigan Voice mail , 1983, AFIPS '83.

[59]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  The College Sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the Record Straight , 1987 .

[60]  A. Dennis,et al.  Paradox of richness: a cognitive model of media choice , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[61]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[62]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills , 1975 .

[63]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[64]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[65]  France Bélanger,et al.  Communication Media Repertoires: Dealing with the Multiplicity of Media Choices , 2007, MIS Q..

[66]  Cretson L. Dalmadge,et al.  Media choice for complex and knowledge-intensive processes , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[67]  Gregory R. Berry Can Computer-Mediated Asynchronous Communication Improve Team Processes and Decision Making? Learning From the Management Literature , 2006 .

[68]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Measuring person‐team fit: development and validation of the team selection inventory , 2004 .

[69]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  The poverty of media richness theory: explaining people's choice of electronic mail vs. voice mail , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[70]  Kathrin Figl,et al.  A Systemic Review of Developing Team Competencies in Information Systems Education , 2010, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[71]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..

[72]  Aileen B. Sedman,et al.  A longitudinal study , 1987 .

[73]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[74]  Michael A. West,et al.  Handbook of Work Group Psychology , 1996 .

[75]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Are All Distributed Teams the Same? Differentiating Between Temporary and Ongoing Distributed Teams , 2006 .

[76]  Kathrin Figl Exploring the Effects of Communication Frequency and Media Choice on Team Climate in Student Teams , 2008 .

[77]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research , 2005 .

[78]  Stephanie G. Adams,et al.  Building Successful Student Teams in the Engineering Classroom , 2004 .

[79]  Neal M. Ashkanasy,et al.  A multilevel analysis of team climate and interpersonal exchange relationships at work , 2008 .

[80]  Richard E. Potter,et al.  Virtual team interaction: assessment, consequences, and management , 2000 .

[81]  John G. Howe,et al.  Group climate: An exploratory analysis of construct validity , 1977 .

[82]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Team Structure and Performance: Assessing the Mediating Role of Intrateam Process and the Moderating Role of Task Type , 2000 .