Automated 3D lymphoma lesion segmentation from PET/CT characteristics

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) using 18F-FDG is recognized as the modality of choice for lymphoma, due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Its wider use for the detection of lesions, quantification of their metabolic activity and evaluation of response to treatment demands the development of accurate and reproducible quantitative image interpretation tools. An accurate tumour delineation remains a challenge in PET, due to the limitations the modality suffers from, despite being essential for quantifying reliable changes in tumour tissues. Due to the spatial and spectral properties of PET images, most methods rely on intensity-based strategies. Recent methods also propose to integrate anatomical priors to improve the segmentation process. However, the current routinely-used approach remains a local relative thresholding and requires important user interaction, leading to a process that is not only user-dependent but very laborious in the case of lymphomas. In this paper, we propose to rely on hierarchical image models embedding multimodality PET/CT descriptors for a fully automated PET lesion detection / segmentation, performed via a machine learning process. More precisely, we propose to perform random forest classification within the mixed spatial-spectral space of component-trees modeling PET/CT mages. This new approach, combining the strengths of machine learning and morphological hierarchy models leads to intelligent thresholding based on high-level PET/CT knowledge. We evaluate our approach on a database of multi-centric PET/CT images of patients treated for lymphoma, delineated by an expert. Our method provides good efficiency, with the detection of 92% of all lesions, and accurate segmentation results with mean sensitivity and specificity of 0.73 and 0.99 respectively, without any user interaction.

[1]  Philippe Salembier,et al.  Antiextensive connected operators for image and sequence processing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  Nicolas Passat,et al.  Interactive Segmentation Based on Component-trees , 2011, Image Process. Line.

[3]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Comparative Study With New Accuracy Metrics for Target Volume Contouring in PET Image Guided Radiation Therapy , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Christian Roux,et al.  A Fuzzy Locally Adaptive Bayesian Segmentation Approach for Volume Determination in PET , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. Buatti,et al.  Globally Optimal Tumor Segmentation in PET-CT Images: A Graph-Based Co-segmentation Method , 2011, IPMI.

[6]  Xinjian Chen,et al.  Random Walk and Graph Cut for Co-Segmentation of Lung Tumor on PET-CT Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Xinjian Chen,et al.  Joint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: Applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT images , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Daniel A Low,et al.  A novel PET tumor delineation method based on adaptive region-growing and dual-front active contours. , 2008, Medical physics.

[9]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[10]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Hierarchies and shape-space for pet image segmentation , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[11]  Jérôme Lapuyade-Lahorgue,et al.  SPEQTACLE: An automated generalized fuzzy C-means algorithm for tumor delineation in PET. , 2015, Medical physics.

[12]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Mathematical Morphology: from theory to applications , 2013 .

[13]  Irène Buvat,et al.  Tumor Texture Analysis in PET: Where Do We Stand? , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  C. Rübe,et al.  Comparison of different methods for delineation of 18F-FDG PET-positive tissue for target volume definition in radiotherapy of patients with non-Small cell lung cancer. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Barbara Romaniuk,et al.  Multicriteria 3D PET image segmentation , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Image Processing Theory, Tools and Applications (IPTA).

[16]  Isabelle Bloch,et al.  Joint variational segmentation of CT-PET data for tumoral lesions , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[17]  Ronald Jones,et al.  Connected Filtering and Segmentation Using Component Trees , 1999, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[18]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Concurrent multimodality image segmentation by active contours for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2007, Medical physics.

[19]  Y. Ung,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of Lung Carcinoma Using 3D Texture Features in 18-FDG PET/CT , 2013, International journal of molecular imaging.

[20]  Laurent Mouchard,et al.  Segmentation of Biological Target Volumes on Multi-tracer PET Images Based on Information Fusion for Achieving Dose Painting in Radiotherapy , 2012, MICCAI.

[21]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[22]  Xiaodong Wu,et al.  Comparative study with new accuracy metrics for target volume contouring in PET image guided radiation therapy. , 2012, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[23]  Alexandre Cochet,et al.  Beth Israel Plugin for FIJI : logiciel gratuit et open source pour la recherche scientifique , 2016 .

[24]  Hugues Talbot,et al.  Filtering and segmentation of 3D angiographic data: Advances based on mathematical morphology , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[26]  Jean Cousty,et al.  VOIDD: automatic vessel of intervention dynamic detection in PCI procedures , 2017, ArXiv.

[27]  David Dagan Feng,et al.  Primary lung tumor segmentation from PET–CT volumes with spatial–topological constraint , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[28]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  A graph-theoretic approach for segmentation of PET images , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[29]  Thierry Géraud,et al.  A Comparative Review of Component Tree Computation Algorithms , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.