Time stability of delta‐radiomics features and the impact on patient analysis in longitudinal CT images

PURPOSE This study first aims to show that the values of texture features extracted from phantoms are stable over clinical timescales. Second, that changes in patients' feature values over the course of radiation therapy (RT) are treatment induced and statistically significant. METHODS The CT datasets of a 3D printed anatomically informed texture phantom containing liver and low-contrast modules, and the homogeneous module of the Catphan 500-Series phantom, were acquired once per week over the course of a 6-week period, to simulate the timescale of conventional RT duration. A Definition AS Open CT scanner on rails (Siemens) and our institution's standard abdominal protocol were used. In each phantom module, 8 regions of interest (20 cm 3 ) were selected and 50 texture features were extracted from each module over the longitudinal dataset. The time stability of each feature was evaluated. The expected variation over the treatment timescale was quantified for each texture (module). Subsequently, the pancreas heads of 10 patients who underwent RT for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head with a pathologic response of at least "moderate" (grade 2), were contoured on the daily CTs acquired using the same scanner. The pancreas heads were contoured on one image per week. Mean CT number, skewness, kurtosis, and coarseness were extracted from these data. The phantom modules were shown to be accurate representations of these features in the pancreas data. The change in the feature value between fractions 2 and 26 was compared with the phantom data in order to identify significant changes in feature value. RESULTS Of the 50 features examined in all 3 phantom modules, 47 were found to have zero time-trend when a fit assuming homogeneous variance was used. When a fit allowing for heterogeneous variance was used, 49 features were found to have zero time-trend. Features were stable and repeatable within a feature-specific confidence interval over the 6-week period of acquisition in all three phantom modules. Changes in feature value between fractions 2 and 26 were highly patient specific. Mean CT number was found to decrease significantly in 7 of 10 patients and increase significantly in one patient. Skewness increased significantly in one patient and decreased significantly in one patient. Kurtosis decreased significantly in four patients and increased significantly in one patient. Coarseness increased significantly in seven patients and decreased significantly in one patient. Only one patient experienced no significant changes in feature value. CONCLUSION The CT texture feature measurements of phantoms are stable and repeatable within a feature-specific confidence interval in all three phantom modules. This suggests that the changes observed in features extracted from longitudinal patient CT data may be treatment induced, and demonstrates their potentiality for early assessment of treatment response.

[1]  X. Li,et al.  Early Assessment of Treatment Responses During Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer Using Quantitative Analysis of Daily Computed Tomography. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Shouhao Zhou,et al.  Technical Note: Proof of concept for radiomics‐based quality assurance for computed tomography , 2019, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[3]  P. Lambin,et al.  Evaluating tumor response of non-small cell lung cancer patients with ¹⁸F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: potential for treatment individualization. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative Features of Liver Lesions, Lung Nodules, and Renal Stones at Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Dependency on Radiation Dose and Reconstruction Algorithm. , 2016, Radiology.

[5]  Peter Balter,et al.  Delta-radiomics features for the prediction of patient outcomes in non–small cell lung cancer , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  W. Tsai,et al.  Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Measuring Computed Tomography Scanner Variability of Radiomics Features , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[8]  P. Lambin,et al.  Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  Jinzhong Yang,et al.  Preliminary investigation into sources of uncertainty in quantitative imaging features , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[10]  P. Lambin,et al.  Defining the biological basis of radiomic phenotypes in lung cancer , 2017, eLife.

[11]  X. Li,et al.  Computed tomography number changes observed during computed tomography-guided radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Peter A Balter,et al.  Impact of image preprocessing on the volume dependence and prognostic potential of radiomics features in non-small cell lung cancer , 2016 .

[13]  David A Jaffray,et al.  How Advances in Imaging Will Affect Precision Radiation Oncology. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[15]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Radiomics of Lung Nodules: A Multi-Institutional Study of Robustness and Agreement of Quantitative Imaging Features , 2016, Tomography.

[16]  Sarah E Bohndiek,et al.  Analysis of image heterogeneity using 2D Minkowski functionals detects tumor responses to treatment , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  P. Lambin,et al.  CT-based radiomic signature predicts distant metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  Robert King,et al.  Textural features corresponding to textural properties , 1989, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[19]  Fridtjof Nüsslin,et al.  “Radio-oncomics” , 2017, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[20]  B. Erickson,et al.  Estimation of changing gross tumor volume from longitudinal CTs during radiation therapy delivery based on a texture analysis with classifier algorithms: a proof-of-concept study. , 2019, Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery.

[21]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE. , 2014, Medical physics.

[22]  M. Martel,et al.  High quality machine-robust image features: identification in nonsmall cell lung cancer computed tomography images. , 2013, Medical physics.

[23]  L. Pirtoli,et al.  Delta-radiomics increases multicentre reproducibility: a phantom study , 2020, Medical Oncology.

[24]  Jiazhou Wang,et al.  Test–Retest Data for Radiomics Feature Stability Analysis: Generalizable or Study-Specific? , 2016, Tomography.

[25]  J. Solomon,et al.  Comparison of low-contrast detectability between two CT reconstruction algorithms using voxel-based 3D printed textured phantoms. , 2016, Medical physics.

[26]  B. Erickson,et al.  Assessment of treatment response during chemoradiation therapy for pancreatic cancer based on quantitative radiomic analysis of daily CTs: An exploratory study , 2017, PloS one.

[27]  Robert J. Gillies,et al.  The effect of SUV discretization in quantitative FDG-PET Radiomics: the need for standardized methodology in tumor texture analysis , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Brandon Whitcher,et al.  Quantifying spatial heterogeneity in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI parameter maps , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Huiman X Barnhart,et al.  Applications of the repeatability of quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical analysis of repeat data sets. , 2009, Translational oncology.

[30]  D. Sullivan,et al.  A collaborative enterprise for multi-stakeholder participation in the advancement of quantitative imaging. , 2011, Radiology.

[31]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data , 2015, Radiology.

[32]  Gary Kelloff,et al.  The Quantitative Imaging Network: NCI's Historical Perspective and Planned Goals. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[33]  Andriy Fedorov,et al.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. , 2017, Cancer research.

[34]  P. Lambin,et al.  Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine , 2017, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[35]  Peter Balter,et al.  Can radiomics features be reproducibly measured from CBCT images for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? , 2015, Medical physics.

[36]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[37]  Samuel H. Hawkins,et al.  Reproducibility and Prognosis of Quantitative Features Extracted from CT Images. , 2014, Translational oncology.