Stochastic hydrothermal unit commitment models via stabilized benders decomposition

The high penetration of wind generation has prompted the development of stochastic hydrothermal unit commitment (SHTUC) models, which are more difficult to be solved than their thermal-based counterparts due to hydro generation constraints and inflow uncertainties. For handling the uncertainty, the problem is usually formulated as a two-stage stochastic model (2S-SHTUC), although multistage (MS-SHTUC) formulations have gained increasing attention due to their more realistic assumptions about on–off decisions over the planning horizon. Benders decomposition (BD) is one of the most common methodologies used for solving 2S-SHTUC and MS-SHTUC problems. To overcome the well-known slow convergence of the classical BD when applied to large problems, most authors use accelerating techniques. In this paper, we implement state-of-the-art stabilization methods tailored for speeding up the convergence of the classical BD: local branching and the level regularization. Our experiments are conducted in a real-life SHTUC problem with 11 thermal units, 16 hydro plants, 46 buses and 95 lines. The results show that 2S and MS-SHTUC can benefit from stabilization. The savings in computing times range from 69 to 95% for the 2S-SHTUC model and from 77 to 89% for the MS-SHTUC.

[1]  Yuping Huang,et al.  Two-stage stochastic unit commitment model including non-generation resources with conditional value-at-risk constraints , 2014 .

[2]  P. Sauer,et al.  Uncertainty Management in the Unit Commitment Problem , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  W.S. Sifuentes,et al.  Hydrothermal Scheduling Using Benders Decomposition: Accelerating Techniques , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Enhanced Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Emerging Utility-Scale Energy Storage , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  P. Jirutitijaroen,et al.  Stochastic unit commitment using multi-cut decomposition algorithm with partial aggregation , 2011, 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[6]  Asgeir Tomasgard,et al.  Large-scale power system planning using enhanced Benders decomposition , 2014, 2014 Power Systems Computation Conference.

[7]  Michel Gendreau,et al.  The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Juan P. Ruiz,et al.  Stochastic unit commitment with sub-hourly dispatch constraints , 2013 .

[9]  Antonio Frangioni,et al.  Large-scale unit commitment under uncertainty: an updated literature survey , 2018, Annals of Operations Research.

[10]  Lixin Tang,et al.  Two-stage minimax stochastic unit commitment , 2017 .

[11]  Jianhui Wang,et al.  Stochastic Optimization for Unit Commitment—A Review , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Tao Ding,et al.  Conditional value at risk-based stochastic unit commitment considering the uncertainty of wind power generation , 2017 .

[13]  Antonio Frangioni,et al.  Large-scale Unit Commitment under uncertainty , 2014, 4OR.

[14]  Lei Wu An Improved Decomposition Framework for Accelerating LSF and BD Based Methods for Network-Constrained UC Problems , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Accelerating the Benders decomposition for network-constrained unit commitment problems , 2010 .

[16]  Mohd Wazir Mustafa,et al.  Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review , 2017 .

[17]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[18]  Antonio Frangioni,et al.  Inexact stabilized Benders’ decomposition approaches with application to chance-constrained problems with finite support , 2016, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[19]  Matteo Fischetti,et al.  Local branching , 2003, Math. Program..