A correlation of four rock mass classification systems through their fabric indices

Abstract Four classification systems are investigated in this work, RMR , Q , GSI and RMi . The common parameters of these systems, which concern and characterize solely the rock mass, are those used for rating the rock structure and the joint surface conditions. Rock structure is quantified by the block size or the discontinuity spacing ratings ( BS ) and the joint surface conditions are quantified by the joint conditions ratings ( JC ). A Rock Mass Fabric Index, denoted as F , may thus be defined as a scalar function of the components rock structure and joint conditions i.e., F = F ( BS , JC ) . All rock mass classification systems’ ratings are grouped together in a common Fabric Index chart. The validity of the chart is tested using data extracted from various projects. The use of the chart simplifies input, correlates rock mass classification systems and improves their utility.

[1]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Support of underground excavations in hard rock , 1995 .

[2]  Nick Barton,et al.  Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design , 2002 .

[3]  Resat Ulusay,et al.  Modifications to the geological strength index (GSI) and their applicability to stability of slopes , 1999 .

[4]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Progressive spalling in massive brittle rock , 2000 .

[5]  P. Pells,et al.  Developments in the design of tunnels and caverns in the Triassic rocks of the Sydney region , 2002 .

[6]  Arild Palmström,et al.  Characterizing rock masses by the RMi for use in practical rock engineering: Part 1: The development of the Rock Mass index (RMi) , 1996 .

[7]  R. S. Sinha Underground structures : design and instrumentation , 1989 .

[8]  Nick Barton,et al.  Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support , 1974 .

[9]  A comparison of predicted and actual tunnel behaviour in the İstanbul Metro, Turkey , 2002 .

[10]  J. L. Justo,et al.  The foundation of a 40-storey tower in jointed basalt , 2006 .

[11]  E. Hoek,et al.  Gsi: A Geologically Friendly Tool For Rock Mass Strength Estimation , 2000 .

[12]  R. K. Goel,et al.  Indian experiences with Q and RMR systems , 1995 .

[13]  Z. Bieniawski Engineering rock mass classifications , 1989 .

[14]  Süleyman Dalgıç,et al.  The influence of weak rocks on excavation and support of the Beykoz Tunnel, Turkey , 2000 .

[15]  Aydın Özsan,et al.  Analysis of support requirements for a shallow diversion tunnel at Guledar dam site, Turkey , 2005 .

[16]  Arild Palmström,et al.  Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD) , 2005 .

[17]  Assessment of chalk rock mass in excavations , 1998 .

[18]  HALF TUNNELS ALONG HILL ROADS OF HIMALAYA - AN INNOVATIVE APPROACH , 2003 .

[19]  A. Karakas Practical Rock Engineering , 2008 .

[20]  Arild Palmström Recent developments in rock support estimates by the RMi , 2000 .

[21]  Süleyman Dalgıç,et al.  Tunneling in fault zones, Tuzla tunnel, Turkey , 2003 .

[22]  P. K. Kaiser,et al.  Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus and strength of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system , 2004 .