Measuring Retiming Responses of Passengers to a Prepeak Discount Fare by Tracing Smart Card Data: A Practical Experiment in the Beijing Subway

Understanding passengers’ responses to fare changes is the basis to design reasonable price policies. This work aims to explore retiming responses of travelers changing departure times due to a prepeak discount pricing strategy in the Beijing subway in China, using smart card records from an automatic fare collection (AFC) system. First, a new set of classification indicators is established to segment passengers through a two-step clustering approach. Then, the potentially influenced passengers for the fare policy are identified, and the shifted passengers who changed their departure time are detected by tracing changes in passengers’ expected departure times before and after the policy. Lastly, the fare elasticity of departure time is defined to measure the retiming responses of passengers. Two scenarios are studied of one month (short term) and six months (middle term) after the policy. The retiming elasticity of different passenger groups, retiming elasticity over time, and retiming elasticity functions of shifted time are measured. The results show that there are considerable differences in the retiming elasticities of different passenger groups; low-frequency passengers are more sensitive to discount fares than high-frequency passengers. The retiming elasticity decreases greatly with increasing shifted time, and 30 minutes is almost the maximum acceptable shifted time for passengers. Moreover, the retiming elasticity of passengers in the middle term is approximately twice that in the short term. Applications of fare optimization are also executed, and the results suggest that optimizing the valid time window of the discount fares is a feasible way to improve the congestion relief effect of the policy, while policy makers should be cautious to change fare structures and increase discounts.

[1]  Adam Rahbee,et al.  Origin and Destination Estimation in New York City with Automated Fare System Data , 2002 .

[2]  J. Preston,et al.  The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership , 2006 .

[3]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[4]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[5]  Chung-Cheng Lu,et al.  Variable Toll Pricing and Heterogeneous Users: Model and Solution Algorithm for Bicriterion Dynamic Traffic Assignment Problem , 2006 .

[6]  Erik T. Verhoef,et al.  Train Commuters' Scheduling Preferences: Evidence from a Large-Scale Peak Avoidance Experiment , 2015 .

[7]  Alain Pirotte,et al.  THE MAIN DETERMINANTS OF THE DEMAND FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORT: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ENGLAND AND FRANCE USING SHRINKAGE ESTIMATORS , 2003 .

[8]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  A bi-criterion dynamic user equilibrium traffic assignment model and solution algorithm for evaluating dynamic road pricing strategies , 2008 .

[9]  C.-Y. Tsai,et al.  A purchase-based market segmentation methodology , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Ahmad Tavassoli,et al.  Public transport trip purpose inference using smart card fare data , 2018 .

[11]  Zi-jia Wang,et al.  Passengers’ response to transit fare change: an ex post appraisal using smart card data , 2018 .

[12]  David A. Hensher,et al.  Assessing systematic sources of variation in public transport elasticities: Some comparative warnings , 2008 .

[13]  Heng Wei,et al.  Detecting home location and trip purposes for cardholders by mining smart card transaction data in Beijing subway , 2018 .

[14]  H. Mahmassani,et al.  Toll Pricing and Heterogeneous Users , 2005 .

[15]  Yunpeng Wang,et al.  Understanding commuting patterns using transit smart card data , 2017 .

[16]  Etienne Côme,et al.  Analyzing year-to-year changes in public transport passenger behaviour using smart card data , 2017 .

[17]  Richard H. Pratt,et al.  Transit Pricing and Fares - Traveler Response to Transportation System Changes , 2004 .

[18]  Xiaohong Li,et al.  Impact evaluation of a mass transit fare change on demand and revenue utilizing smart card data , 2015 .

[19]  Peter White,et al.  The Potential of Public Transport Smart Card Data , 2005 .

[20]  Paul Schimek Dynamic Estimates of Fare Elasticity for U.S. Public Transit , 2015 .

[21]  Chung-Cheng Lu,et al.  Modeling Heterogeneous Network User Route and Departure Time Responses to Dynamic Pricing , 2011 .

[22]  Hani S. Mahmassani,et al.  Modeling User Responses to Pricing , 2008 .

[23]  T. Litman Transit Price Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities , 2004 .

[24]  Paul Koster,et al.  Long‐Run Versus Short‐Run Perspectives on Consumer Scheduling: Evidence from a Revealed‐Preference Experiment Among Peak‐Hour Road Commuters , 2015 .

[25]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Smart card data use in public transit: A literature review , 2011 .

[26]  Joyce Dargay,et al.  The demand for local bus services in England , 2002 .

[27]  Phil Charles,et al.  Spreading peak demand for urban rail transit through differential fare policy : a review of empirical evidence , 2013 .

[28]  Khandker Nurul Habib,et al.  An investigation of commuting trip timing and mode choice in the Greater Toronto Area: Application of a joint discrete-continuous model , 2009 .

[29]  Graham Currie,et al.  Quick and Effective Solution to Rail Overcrowding: Free Early Bird Ticket Experience in Melbourne, Australia , 2010 .

[30]  M. Trépanier,et al.  Detection of Activities of Public Transport Users by Analyzing Smart Card Data , 2012 .

[31]  Johan Holmgren,et al.  Meta-Analysis of Public Transport Demand , 2007 .

[32]  Charu C. Aggarwal,et al.  Data Clustering: Algorithms and Applications , 2014 .

[33]  V. Terzija,et al.  Two-step spectral clustering controlled islanding algorithm , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[34]  Aya Aboudina,et al.  Time-dependent congestion pricing system for large networks: Integrating departure time choice, dynamic traffic assignment and regional travel surveys in the Greater Toronto Area , 2016 .