Online Simulator Use in the Preparing Chemical Engineers

Active learning strategies including simulations have been promoted by engineering education reformers as an effort to move traditional STEM teaching toward more constructivist practices. In this study chemical engineering students were studied during the implementation of simulators to promote critical thinking. While many have studied achievement and perceptions of students to measure engineering tools and their development, this study specifically examined students' outcomes connecting the tool to specific teaching and learning strategies. A case study was conducted using pre-and post-test, survey questionnaire, individual interviews, and classroom observations. Results showed the use of simulator was associated with increases in students' scores but the novelty of innovation was not the single explanation for increased scores or favored technology usage. Interviews and other qualitative data suggested that outcomes may closely tie teaching strategies to the effectiveness of the tool rather than the focus on the tool itself. Implications for teaching and future research are discussed.

[1]  Diana G. Oblinger,et al.  Educating the Net Generation , 2005 .

[2]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick,et al.  The impact of technology on the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast's sixth grade science classroom , 2007 .

[3]  Wmg Wim Jochems,et al.  Changing a traditional lecturing approach into an interactive approach , 2002 .

[4]  Jon E. Pedersen,et al.  Technology in Science Teacher Education: Survey of Current Uses and Desired Knowledge among Science Educators , 2000 .

[5]  Margaret L. Niess.  Leveraging Dynamic and Dependable Spreadsheets Focusing on Algebraic Thinking and Reasoning , 2015 .

[6]  J. Osborne,et al.  Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .

[7]  R. Bell,et al.  The Use of a Computer Simulation to Promote Scientific Conceptions of Moon Phases , 2008 .

[8]  Mathematics Acquisition and Immigrant Children , 2014 .

[9]  Mihaela Sabin,et al.  Bridging the Academia-Industry Gap in Software Engineering: A Client-Oriented Open Source Software Projects Course , 2014 .

[10]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry‐based experiments in physics , 2003 .

[11]  C. E. Wieman,et al.  Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics , 2007, 0709.4503.

[12]  S. Erduran,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .

[13]  R. Osborne,et al.  Learning in science : the implications of children's science , 1985 .

[14]  R. Eynon,et al.  Digital natives: where is the evidence? , 2010 .

[15]  Z. C. Zacharia,et al.  Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[16]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[17]  Jg Mackenzie,et al.  Amoco Computer Simulation in Chemical Engineering Education , 2001 .

[18]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argument in school science , 2001 .

[19]  L. J. Feldmann,et al.  Active participation by sophomore students in the design of experiments , 1997, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1997 27th Annual Conference. Teaching and Learning in an Era of Change.

[20]  James E. Groccia,et al.  A Comparative Assessment of Students' Experiences in Two Instructional Formats of an Introductory Materials Science Course , 1997 .

[21]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[22]  Carolyn S. Wallace,et al.  Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices , 2005 .

[23]  P. Garcia,et al.  Identifying the Generation Gap in Higher Education: Where Do the Differences Really Lie? , 2007 .

[24]  Jon E. Pedersen,et al.  Technology Knowledge and Use: A Survey of Science Educators , 2002 .

[25]  Shirley Simon,et al.  Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .

[26]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[27]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  How Does Technology-Enabled Active Learning Affect Undergraduate Students' Understanding of Electromagnetism Concepts? , 2005 .

[28]  H. Becker,et al.  Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist-Compatible Computer Use , 2000 .

[29]  Richard M. Felder.  It Goes without Saying. , 1991 .

[30]  J. Huppert,et al.  Computer simulations in the high school: Students' cognitive stages, science process skills and academic achievement in microbiology , 2002 .

[31]  Duncan M. Fraser,et al.  Enhancing the Learning of Fluid Mechanics Using Computer Simulations , 2007 .

[32]  E. Glasersfeld.  Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching , 1989 .

[33]  Ömer Geban,et al.  Effects of Computer Simulations and Problem-Solving Approaches on High School Students , 1992 .

[34]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[35]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Establishing Scientific Classroom Discourse Communities , 2004 .

[36]  Diane L. Beaudoin,et al.  A Product and Process Engineering Laboratory for Freshmen , 1995 .

[37]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[38]  T. Mcdaniel,et al.  Review of A Whole New Mind: Why Right-Brainers Will Rule the Future , 2008 .

[39]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics, 2008. NCES 2009-020. , 2009 .

[40]  Marcy M. Allen,et al.  The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look At Internet Access and the Digital Divide, Amanda Lenhart (Ed.). The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2003) , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[41]  Kenan Dikilitaş.  Innovative Professional Development Methods and Strategies for STEM Education , 2015 .

[42]  Paul B. Hounshell,et al.  The microcomputer and achievement and attitudes in high school biology , 1989 .

[43]  Amy Pallant,et al.  Reasoning with Atomic-Scale Molecular Dynamic Models , 2004 .

[44]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  The net generation are not big users of Web 2.0 technologies: Preliminary findings , 2007 .

[45]  D. Tapscott.  Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation , 1984 .

[46]  David A. Falvo,et al.  Improving K-12 STEM Education Outcomes through Technological Integration , 2015 .

[47]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World , 2008 .

[48]  Ornella Robutti.  The GeoGebra Institute of Torino, Italy: Research, Teaching Experiments, and Teacher Education , 2013 .

[49]  Glenda Rakes,et al.  An Analysis of Instructional Technology Use and Constructivist Behaviors in K-12 Teachers. , 1999 .

[50]  Kassandra Barnes,et al.  Teaching and Learning with the Net Generation , 2007 .

[51]  Zacharias C. Zacharia,et al.  The Impact of Interactive Computer Simulations on the Nature and Quality of Postgraduate Science Teachers’ Explanations in Physics , 2005 .

[52]  B. Wayne Bequette,et al.  Case Study Projects in an Undergraduate Process Control Course , 1998 .

[53]  M. Linn,et al.  How do technology‐enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? , 2010 .

[54]  Melissa Little,et al.  Leveraging Interactive Clickers as a Tool for Formative Assessment , 2015 .

[55]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[56]  Roman Taraban,et al.  Effects of Active-Learning Experiences on Achievement, Attitudes, and Behaviors in High School Biology , 2007 .

[57]  Marios Papaevripidou,et al.  Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students' conceptual understanding in heat and temperature , 2008 .

[58]  Demos C. Angelides,et al.  Case Studies and Information Technology in Civil Engineering Learning , 2000 .

[59]  David DiBiasio,et al.  A Project-based Spiral Curriculum for Introductory Courses in ChE: Part 2. Implementation. , 2000 .

[60]  Christopher R. Jones,et al.  Net generation or Digital Natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[61]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Examining the effect of teachers' adaptations of a middle school science inquiry-oriented curriculum unit on student learning , 2011 .

[62]  I. Seidman.  Interviewing as qualitative research : a guide for researchersin education and the social sciences , 1991 .

[63]  Charlene M. Czerniak,et al.  From Beliefs to Actions: The Beliefs and Actions of Teachers Implementing Change , 2002 .

[64]  Stephen Provasnik,et al.  The Condition of Education 2001. NCES 2001-072. , 2001 .

[65]  Jeff Zwiers,et al.  Using New Technologies to Engage and Support English Language Learners in Mathematics Classrooms , 2015 .

[66]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[67]  R. Felder,et al.  The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development , 2010 .

[68]  John M. Parente,et al.  Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students' Reported Learning Gains * , 2001 .