Comprehensive Evaluation and Physiological Response of Quinoa Genotypes to Low Nitrogen

The utilization of low-N tolerant and N-efficifent varieties offers significant benefits in terms of reducing the need for excessive N fertilizer input. Quinoa, a resilient crop for agroecological transition, possesses a wide genetic diversity, making it suitable for selecting genotypes that require less N fertilizer. In this study, the growth and physiological characteristics of nine quinoa genotypes were assessed to determine their low-N tolerance using the fuzzy membership function. Based on comprehensive evaluation indices, three genotypes were identified: low-N tolerant (BL22), intermediately tolerant (A29), and sensitive (G68). These genotypes were exposed to varying N concentrations, including normal (4 mM), low (0.8 mM), and deficient N (no N) conditions. The results indicate that low-N conditions altered root phenotype, with reduced biomass, total protein, and chlorophyll content; increased soluble sugar levels; and inhibited N-metabolizing enzymes (nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate synthase) and N uptake. Under low-N conditions, the tolerant genotype exhibited higher maximal efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), root vitality, and N content compared to the sensitive genotype. Interestingly, the sensitive genotype displayed elongated and thinner shoots and roots in response to low-N, suggesting that plant height and root length are unreliable indicators of low-N tolerance in quinoa. In contrast, shoot and root dry biomass, Fv/Fm, chlorophyll content, N-metabolizing enzymes, and N content proved to be reliable indicators of low-N tolerance during the early growth stage of quinoa. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of utilizing specific growth and physiological parameters as indicators for screening low-N tolerant quinoa genotypes, thereby reducing dependence on N fertilizers.

[1]  Shuisen Chen,et al.  Comprehensive screening of low nitrogen tolerant maize based on multiple traits at the seedling stage , 2022, PeerJ.

[2]  S. Anwar,et al.  Phosphorus Fertigation Conferred Lodging Tolerance and Improved Grain Quality in Chenopodium quinoa via Enhanced Root Proliferation and Stalk Strength , 2022, Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.

[3]  H. Saudy,et al.  Effect of Irrigation, Nitrogen Sources, and Metribuzin on Performance of Maize and Its Weeds , 2022, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis.

[4]  A. Henry,et al.  Integrated root phenotypes for improved rice performance under low nitrogen availability , 2022, Plant, cell & environment.

[5]  C. Masclaux-Daubresse,et al.  Genotypic Variation of Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Amino Acid Metabolism in Barley , 2022, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[6]  H. Saudy,et al.  Effect of Iron, Zinc, and Manganese Nano-Form Mixture on the Micronutrient Recovery Efficiency and Seed Yield Response Index of Sesame Genotypes , 2021, Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition.

[7]  Qingguo Du,et al.  Comparative transcriptome analysis of different nitrogen responses in low-nitrogen sensitive and tolerant maize genotypes , 2021, Journal of Integrative Agriculture.

[8]  Baohong Zhang,et al.  Response of Root Growth and Development to Nitrogen and Potassium Deficiency as well as microRNA-Mediated Mechanism in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) , 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science.

[9]  Xiaoxi Zhen,et al.  Adaptation Mechanism of Roots to Low and High Nitrogen Revealed by Proteomic Analysis , 2021, Rice.

[10]  S. Orlandini,et al.  The effect of heat stress on quinoa (cv. Titicaca) under controlled climatic conditions , 2020, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[11]  B. Feng,et al.  Low-nitrogen tolerance comprehensive evaluation and physiological response to nitrogen stress in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) seedling. , 2020, Plant physiology and biochemistry : PPB.

[12]  A. Ojha,et al.  Identification of Wheat Cultivars for Low Nitrogen Tolerance Using Multivariable Screening Approaches , 2020 .

[13]  N. von Wirén,et al.  Signaling pathways underlying nitrogen-dependent changes in root system architecture: from model to crop species , 2020, Journal of experimental botany.

[14]  Adrian Gracia-Romero,et al.  Evaluating Maize Genotype Performance under Low Nitrogen Conditions Using RGB UAV Phenotyping Techniques , 2019, Sensors.

[15]  H. Silva,et al.  Nitrogen physiology of contrasting genotypes of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Amaranthaceae) , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[16]  R. Parsad,et al.  Phenotyping for Nitrogen Use Efficiency: Rice Genotypes Differ in N-Responsive Germination, Oxygen Consumption, Seed Urease Activities, Root Growth, Crop Duration, and Yield at Low N , 2018, Front. Plant Sci..

[17]  Hengheng Zhang,et al.  Identification and screening of nitrogen-efficient cotton genotypes under low and normal nitrogen environments at the seedling stage , 2018, Journal of Cotton Research.

[18]  Guo-ping Zhang,et al.  Growth and physiological characterization of low nitrogen responses in Tibetan wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) and cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare) , 2017 .

[19]  M. Shahid,et al.  Quinoa for Marginal Environments: Toward Future Food and Nutritional Security in MENA and Central Asia Regions , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[20]  H. Geren EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT NITROGEN LEVELS ON THE GRAIN YIELD AND SOME YIELD COMPONENTS OF QUINOA (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) UNDER MEDITERRANEAN CLIMATIC CONDITIONS , 2015 .

[21]  Eva Rosenqvist,et al.  Wheat cultivars selected for high Fv /Fm under heat stress maintain high photosynthesis, total chlorophyll, stomatal conductance, transpiration and dry matter. , 2015, Physiologia plantarum.

[22]  N. von Wirén,et al.  It's time to make changes: modulation of root system architecture by nutrient signals. , 2014, Journal of experimental botany.

[23]  Hyung-Keun Ku,et al.  Interpretation of protein quantitation using the Bradford assay: comparison with two calculation models. , 2013, Analytical biochemistry.

[24]  Lei Shi,et al.  ADAPTABILITY MECHANISM OF NITROGEN-EFFICIENT GERMPLASM OF NATURAL VARIATION TO LOW NITROGEN STRESS IN BRASSICA NAPUS , 2010 .

[25]  E. Justes,et al.  Relationship Between the Normalized SPAD Index and the Nitrogen Nutrition Index: Application to Durum Wheat , 2006 .

[26]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Physiological traits for crop yield improvement in low N and P environments , 2002, Plant and Soil.

[27]  I. Vidal,et al.  Fertilización nitrogenada en quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) , 2000 .

[28]  R. Gifford,et al.  Acquisition and allocation of carbon and nitrogen by Danthonia richardsonii in response to restricted nitrogen supply and CO2 enrichment , 1998 .

[29]  J. Graham,et al.  Purification and Developmental Analysis of the Major Anionic Peroxidase from the Seed Coat of Glycine max. , 1991, Plant physiology.

[30]  J. M. Bremner,et al.  Determination and Isotope-Ratio Analysis of Different Forms of Nitrogen in Soils: I. Apparatus and Procedure for Distillation and Determination of Ammonium1 , 1965 .

[31]  A. Willis,et al.  The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. , 1954, The Biochemical journal.

[32]  M. Siddiqi,et al.  Utilization index: A modified approach to the estimation and comparison of nutrient utilization efficiency in plants , 1981 .

[33]  S. Aust,et al.  Microsomal lipid peroxidation. , 1978, Methods in enzymology.