The 'best available science' to inform 1.5 [deg]C policy choices

[1]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled , 2016 .

[2]  Nicholas Stern,et al.  Economics: Current climate models are grossly misleading , 2016, Nature.

[3]  Phil Williamson,et al.  Emissions reduction: Scrutinize CO2 removal methods , 2016, Nature.

[4]  Mike Hulme,et al.  1.5 [deg]C and climate research after the Paris Agreement , 2016 .

[5]  R. Houghton,et al.  A role for tropical forests in stabilizing atmospheric CO 2 , 2015 .

[6]  Kevin Anderson,et al.  Duality in climate science , 2015 .

[7]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment , 2015 .

[8]  G. Luderer,et al.  Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C , 2015 .

[9]  Oliver Geden,et al.  Policy: Climate advisers must maintain integrity , 2015, Nature.

[10]  Sally M. Benson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage: Issues and Prospects , 2014 .

[11]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Betting on negative emissions , 2014 .

[12]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  WHAT DOES THE 2 C TARGET IMPLY FOR A GLOBAL CLIMATE AGREEMENT IN 2020? THE LIMITS STUDY ON DURBAN PLATFORM SCENARIOS , 2013 .

[13]  D. McCollum,et al.  Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation , 2013, Nature.

[14]  Jan S Fuglestvedt,et al.  Comparing the climate effect of emissions of short- and long-lived climate agents , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[15]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[16]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .