Quantitative reflection contrast microscopy of living cells

Mammalian cells in culture (BHK-21, PtK2, Friend, human flia, and glioma cells) have been observed by reflection contrast microscopy. Images of cells photographed at two different wavelengths (546 and 436 nm) or at two different angles of incidence allowed discrimination between reflected light and light that was both reflected and modulated by interference. Interference is involved when a change in reflected intensity (relative to glass/medium background reflected intensity) occurs on changing either the illumination wavelength or the reflection incidence angle. In cases where interference occurs, refractive indices can be determined at points where the optical path difference is known, by solving the given interference equation. Where cells are at least 50 nm distant from the glass substrate, intensities are also influenced by that distance as well as by the light's angle of incidence and wavelength. The reflected intensity at the glass/medium interface is used as a standard in calculating the refractive index of the cortical cytoplasm. Refractive indices were found to be higher (1.38--1.40) at points of focal contact, where stress fibers terminate, than in areas of close contact (1.354--1.368). In areas of the cortical cytoplasm, between focal contacts, not adherent to the glass substrate, refractive indices between 1.353 and 1.368 were found. This was thought to result from a microfilamentous network within the cortical cytoplasm. Intimate attachment of cells to their substrate is assumed to be characterized by a lack of an intermediate layer of culture medium.

[1]  J. Bereiter-Hahn A model for microtubular rigidity. , 1978, Cytobiologie.

[2]  J. Heath,et al.  Cell to substratum contacts of chick fibroblasts and their relation to the microfilament system. A correlated interference-reflexion and high-voltage electron-microscope study. , 1978, Journal of cell science.

[3]  K Weber,et al.  Visualization of a system of filaments 7-10 nm thick in cultured cells of an epithelioid line (Pt K2) by immunofluorescence microscopy. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Lloyd,et al.  Control of grip and stick in cell adhesion through lateral relationships of membrane glycoproteins , 1977, Nature.

[5]  C. S. Izzard,et al.  Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. , 1976, Journal of cell science.

[6]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  Adhesions of fibroblasts to substratum during contact inhibition observed by interference reflection microscopy. , 1975, Experimental cell research.

[7]  E. Lazarides,et al.  Actin antibody: the specific visualization of actin filaments in non-muscle cells. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Revel,et al.  Electronmicroscope investigations of the underside of cells in culture. , 1973, Experimental cell research.

[9]  N. K. Wessells,et al.  Cell locomotion, nerve elongation, and microfilaments. , 1973, Developmental biology.

[10]  R. Goldman,et al.  The concentrations of dry matter in mitotic apparatuses in vivo and after isolation from sea-urchin zygotes. , 1972, Journal of cell science.

[11]  R. Goldman THE ROLE OF THREE CYTOPLASMIC FIBERS IN BHK-21 CELL MOTILITY , 1971, The Journal of cell biology.

[12]  W. Scher,et al.  Hemoglobin synthesis in murine virus-induced leukemic cells in vitro: stimulation of erythroid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  V. Ingram,et al.  A Side View of Moving Fibroblasts , 1969, Nature.

[14]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS , 1964, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  R. R. Cowden,et al.  SYNERESIS IN AMEBOID MOVEMENT: ITS LOCALIZATION BY INTERFERENCE MICROSCOPY AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE , 1962, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  CLAYTON'S ELECTROTHERAPY AND ACTINOTHERAPY , 1958, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[17]  J. Mitchison,et al.  Measurements on Sea-urchin Eggs with an Interference Microscope , 1953 .

[18]  T. Pollard Functional implications of the biochemical and structural properties of cytoplasmic contractile proteins. , 1975, Society of General Physiologists series.

[19]  R. Goldman,et al.  Functions of Cytoplasmic Fibers in Non-Muscle Cell Motility , 1973 .

[20]  R. Goldman,et al.  Fibrillar systems in cell motility. , 1973, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[21]  N. K. Wessells,et al.  Surface movements, microfilaments and cell locomotion. , 1973, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[22]  E. J. Ambrose,et al.  Surface-contact microscopy. Studies in cell movements. , 1961, Medical & biological illustration.

[23]  Kurt Michel,et al.  Die Grundlagen der Theorie des Mikroskops , 1950 .

[24]  K. Weber,et al.  Antibody Against Tubulin : The Specific Visualization of Cytoplasmic Microtubules in Tissue Culture Cells , 2022 .