Harder Words: Learning Abstract Verbs with Opaque Syntax

Highly abstract predicates (e.g. think) present a number of difficulties for language learners (Gleitman et al., 2005). A partial solution to learning these verbs is that learners exploit regularities in the syntactic frames in which these verbs occur. While agreeing with this general approach to learning verbs, we caution that this strategy is not sufficient for learning another class of abstract verbs known as “raising” verbs (seem) since their argument structure frames cannot always be directly read off of the surface syntax. We conducted a novel verb learning study to test the role played by subject (in)animacy in determining the syntactic frame of novel verbs that could be categorized as raising verbs. Animacy is useful since raising but not control verbs admit inanimate subjects (The rock seems/#claims to be heavy). We outline a two-step process of probabilistic verb categorization that relies on subject animacy in addition to more traditional Syntactic Bootstrapping assumptions. We conclude by suggesting more general applications of this process to learning other kinds of opaque abstract predicates.

[1]  K. Wexler,et al.  The Late Development of Raising: What Children Seem to Think about Seem , 2007 .

[2]  Misha Becker,et al.  Computational Models of Learning the Raising-Control Distinction , 2010 .

[3]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Syntactic Bootstrapping and the Internal Structure of Causative Events , 2005 .

[4]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Input to verb learning: Evidence for the plausibility of syntactic bootstrapping , 1995 .

[5]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Kidz in the 'Hood: Syntactic Bootstrapping and the Mental Lexicon , 2001 .

[6]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Native language and foreign language acquisition , 1981 .

[7]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  The input to verb learning in Mandarin Chinese: a role for syntactic bootstrapping. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[8]  J. Bresnan Lexical-Functional Syntax , 2000 .

[9]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[10]  U. Goswami Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development , 2002 .

[11]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Secret Agents , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  Henrietta Lempert,et al.  Animacy constraints on preschool children's acquisition of syntax , 1989 .

[13]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive , 1987, Cognition.

[14]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[15]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Hard Words , 2005, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[16]  E. Kako,et al.  First contact in verb acquisition: defining a role for syntax. , 1993, Child development.

[17]  Misha Becker Learning Verbs Without Arguments: The Problem of Raising Verbs , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[19]  H. Gleitman,et al.  Human simulations of vocabulary learning , 1999, Cognition.

[20]  M. Grace A logical point of view , 2003, British Dental Journal.

[21]  Cynthia Fisher,et al.  On the semantic content of subcategorization frames , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  SECOND‐LANGUAGE ACQUISITION FROM A FUNCTIONALIST PERSPECTIVE: PRAGMATIC, SEMANTIC, AND PERCEPTUAL STRATEGIES * , 1981 .

[23]  F. Ferreira Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .

[24]  Laura Lakusta,et al.  Using Language to Navigate the Infant Mind , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[25]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A Festschrift for Morris Halle , 1973 .

[26]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[27]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[28]  Edward Thomas Kako,et al.  The event semantics of syntactic structures , 1998 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Conditions on transformations , 1971 .

[30]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Selective learning in the acquisition of Kannada ditransitives , 2011 .

[31]  L. Gleitman,et al.  Language and Experience: Evidence from the Blind Child , 1988 .

[32]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  Why are some verbs learned before other verbs? Effects of input frequency and structure on children's early verb use , 1998, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  Sander Lestrade,et al.  Animacy, argument structure, and argument encoding , 2008 .

[34]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  Towards a universal definition of "Subject , 2014 .

[35]  E. Markman,et al.  When it is better to receive than to give: Syntactic and conceptual constraints on vocabulary growth , 1994 .

[36]  Letitia R. Naigles,et al.  The use of multiple frames in verb learning via syntactic bootstrapping , 1996, Cognition.

[37]  Comrie Bernard Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[38]  Colette G. Craig The structure of Jacaltec , 1977 .

[39]  A. Leslie Pretense and representation: The origins of "theory of mind." , 1987 .

[40]  Misha Becker,et al.  Tough-Adjectives are Easy to Learn * , 2012 .

[41]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[42]  Lila R. Gleitman,et al.  Why It Is Hard to Label Our Concepts. , 2004 .

[43]  Peter Steven Rosenbaum,et al.  The grammar of English predicate complement constructions , 1967 .

[44]  Misha Becker,et al.  There Began to Be a Learnability Puzzle , 2006, Linguistic Inquiry.

[45]  L. Gleitman The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings , 2020, Sentence First, Arguments Afterward.

[46]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 2010 .

[47]  K. Sakuma The structure of the Japanese language , 1951 .

[48]  Martin Corley,et al.  Timing accuracy of Web experiments: A case study using the WebExp software package , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[49]  Esther Dromi,et al.  Language and cognition : a developmental perspective , 1993 .

[50]  L. Gleitman,et al.  When we think about thinking: The acquisition of belief verbs , 2007, Cognition.

[51]  N. A. Mccawley,et al.  The structure of the Japanese language , 1973 .

[52]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Language Learning and Language Universals , 2010, Biolinguistics.

[53]  Charles D. Yang,et al.  Knowledge and learning in natural language , 2000 .