Quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing, geometric measurement and statistical methods: Application on SEM images of clay materials

Abstract A series of image processing technologies and geometric measurement methods is introduced to quantify multiple scale microporosity in images. All the operations are non-destructive so as to ensure the accuracy of the results. With the application of these methods, various basic geometric parameters of the pores can be computed automatically in the computer, such as area, perimeter, direction etc. On the basis of these geometric parameters, probability entropy, probability distribution index and fractal dimension were introduced to describe the distribution of the three major characteristics of pore system, direction, area and form factor, respectively. Computer software developed on the basis of these methods was used to quantify the SEM images of clay samples during shear test. According to the quantification result, total pore area and average pore form factor reduce during the test. The variation of pore area and form factor is related to probability distribution index and fractal dimension, which indicates the variation of microstructures between pores. Error analysis shows that the deviation using the image processing is within 5%, and the deviations of statistical parameters are smaller in comparison with those of basic geometric parameters. The statistical methods are adapted to the quantification of 2D multiple scale objects. This paper offers a reliable basis for the quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing.

[1]  S. Sammartino,et al.  Cam-clay and hydraulic conductivity diagram relations in consolidated and sheared clay-matrices , 2004, Clay Minerals.

[2]  B. Obara,et al.  Utilisation of the image analysis method for the detection of the morphological anisotropy of calcite grains in marble , 2007 .

[3]  M. Alba,et al.  Chemical reactivity of argillaceous material in engineered barrier: Rare earth disilicate formation under subcritical conditions , 2009 .

[4]  Georges Calas,et al.  Radiation effects on clay mineral properties , 2009 .

[5]  A. Meunier,et al.  A new method for quantitative petrography based on image processing of chemical element maps: Part I. Mineral mapping applied to compacted bentonites , 2010 .

[6]  Pedro Pina,et al.  Morphological segmentation and classification of marble textures at macroscopical scale , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[7]  M. Erdoğan.  Measurement of polished rock surface brightness by image analysis method , 2000 .

[8]  A. Meunier,et al.  A new method for quantitative petrography based on image processing of chemical element maps: Part II. Semi-quantitative porosity maps superimposed on mineral maps , 2010 .

[9]  A. Burak Göktepe,et al.  Image analysis of sulfate attack on hardened cement paste , 2008 .

[10]  Mohamed Azaroual,et al.  Geochemical and solute transport modelling for CO2 storage, what to expect from it? , 2008 .

[11]  Wil G. M. Geraets,et al.  An efficient filling algorithm for counting regions , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  M. R. Cox,et al.  A practical approach to grain shape quantification , 2008 .

[13]  M. Oliver,et al.  Problems with determining the particle size distribution of chalk soil and some of their implications , 2009 .

[14]  Parviz Soroushian,et al.  Morphological operations, planar mathematical formulations, and stereological interpretations for automated image analysis of concrete microstructure , 2005 .

[15]  J. Graham,et al.  Particle orientation and its influence on the mechanical behaviour of isotropically consolidated reconstituted clay , 2002 .

[16]  E. Tévissen,et al.  Spatial distribution of porosity and minerals in clay rocks from the Callovo-Oxfordian formation (Meuse/Haute-Marne, Eastern France)—implications on ionic species diffusion and rock sorption capability , 2003 .

[17]  H. Millán,et al.  The relationship between surface fractal dimension and soil water content at permanent wilting point , 2009 .

[18]  De’an Sun,et al.  A fractal model for soil pores and its application to determination of water permeability , 2002 .

[19]  R. Pusch,et al.  Microstructural stability controls the hydraulic conductivity of smectitic buffer clay , 2003 .

[20]  Gerhard Gerold,et al.  The surface fractal dimension of the soil–pore interface as measured by image analysis , 2001 .

[21]  C. Moore,et al.  Quantifying soil microstructure using fractals , 1995 .

[22]  Fei He,et al.  A rapid 3D seed-filling algorithm based on scan slice , 2010, Comput. Graph..

[23]  B. Shi,et al.  Magnification effects on the interpretation of SEM images of expansive soils , 2005 .

[24]  Martin Thullner,et al.  The relationship between fractal properties of solid matrix and pore space in porous media , 2005 .

[25]  Mitsunori Kawamura,et al.  Evaluation of capillary pore size characteristics in high-strength concrete at early ages , 2005 .

[26]  Satoru Suzuki,et al.  Analysis of microstructural images of dry and water-saturated compacted bentonite samples observed with X-ray micro CT , 2010 .

[27]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Survey over image thresholding techniques and quantitative performance evaluation , 2004, J. Electronic Imaging.

[28]  N. Michau,et al.  A simplified method to evaluate the swelling capacity evolution of a bentonite barrier related to geochemical transformations , 2005 .

[29]  N. Prakongkep,et al.  SEM image analysis for characterization of sand grains in Thai paddy soils , 2010 .