High‐Definition Flow Doppler Ultrasonographic Technique to Assess Hepatic Vasculature Compared With Color or Power Doppler Ultrasonography

Objective. The purpose of this study was to introduce a new high‐definition flow (HDF) Doppler technique and to compare its performance with those of color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) and power Doppler ultrasonography (PDU) for assessment of hepatic vasculature in native and transplanted livers. Methods. High‐definition flow was invented as a high‐resolution bidirectional PDU technique. We obtained CDU, PDU, and HDF images of the hepatic artery (HA), portal vein (PV), and hepatic vein from 60 patients. They were divided into 2 groups: a liver transplantation group (group 1, n = 10) and a native liver group (group 2, n = 50). Two radiologists independently reviewed the cine images and graded them using a 4‐point scale in terms of the clarity of the vessel margin and degree of depiction of the HA, flow filling, and flash artifacts. The degree of differentiation between the HA and PV was also evaluated. Flow directionality was recorded, and interobserver agreement was finally analyzed. Results. Moderate to almost perfect agreement was achieved between radiologists for all parameters of each ultrasonographic technique. High‐definition flow was significantly superior to both CDU and PDU with respect to all analyzed items except the degree of flash artifacts (P < .05). With regard to flash artifacts, CDU was significantly better than either PDU or HDF. High‐definition flow provided directional information, as did CDU. Conclusions. The HDF technique provides better resolution for depicting hepatic vessels as well as their margins with less blooming compared with conventional Doppler ultrasonography in both native and transplanted liver. It also provides solid directional flow information. One point of concern, however, is the frequency of flash artifacts compared with that on CDU.

[1]  Jeanne Cullinan,et al.  Doppler artifacts and pitfalls. , 2006, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[2]  T. Hata.  Modern 3D/4D sonographic studies on fetal heart , 2006 .

[3]  P. Neuhaus,et al.  Liver Transplantation as Ultimate Tool to Treat Portal Hypertension , 2005, Digestive Diseases.

[4]  D. Rubens,et al.  Slow flow or no flow? Color and power Doppler US pitfalls in the abdomen and pelvis. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[5]  S. M. Ellis,et al.  Microbubble ultrasound contrast in the assessment of hepatic artery patency following liver transplantation: role in reducing frequency of hepatic artery arteriography , 2004, European Radiology.

[6]  T. Kim,et al.  Hepatic vein stenosis after living donor liver transplantation: evaluation with Doppler US. , 2003, Radiology.

[7]  R. Felix,et al.  Focal liver lesions: Doppler ultrasound , 1999, European Radiology.

[8]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Color Doppler Energy: Computer Analysis of Color to Assess Angle Dependency and Detection of Volume Flow Differences , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[9]  H. Weskott,et al.  Amplitude Doppler Us: Slow Blood Flow Detection Tested with a Flow Phantom , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  U. Hamper,et al.  Power Doppler imaging: clinical experience and correlation with color Doppler US and other imaging modalities. , 1997, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler: it's a good thing. , 1997, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[12]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler sonography. , 1996, Radiology.

[13]  B. Choi,et al.  Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of vasculature in liver tumors. , 1996, Radiology.

[14]  M. Moritz,et al.  Arterial abnormalities following orthotopic liver transplantation: arteriographic findings and correlation with Doppler sonographic findings. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  G. Dodd,et al.  Hepatic artery stenosis and thrombosis in transplant recipients: Doppler diagnosis with resistive index and systolic acceleration time. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  J. Rubin,et al.  Power versus conventional color Doppler sonography: comparison in the depiction of normal intrarenal vasculature. , 1994, Radiology.

[17]  J M Rubin,et al.  Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. , 1994, Radiology.

[18]  J A Zagzebski,et al.  Spectral and color Doppler artifacts. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[19]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.