Enhancement of student learning performance using personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system

Although conventional student assessments are extremely convenient for calculating student scores, they do not conceptualize how students organize their knowledge. Therefore, teachers and students rarely understand how to improve their future learning progress. The limitations of conventional testing methods indicate the importance of accurately assessing and representing student knowledge structures. The personalized diagnosis and remedial learning system (PDRLS) proposed in this study enhances the effectiveness of the Pathfinder network by providing remedial learning paths for individual learners based on their knowledge structure. The sample was 145 students enrolled in introductory JAVA programming language courses at a Central Taiwan technology university. The experimental results demonstrate that learners who received personalized remedial learning guidance via PDRLS achieved improved learning performance, self-efficacy, and PDRLS use intention. The experimental results also indicated that students with lower knowledge level gain more benefits from the PDRLS than those with higher level of knowledge and that field dependence (FD) students obtain a greater benefit from PDRLS than field independence (FI) students do.

[1]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning, and Instruction , 1993 .

[2]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Leon E. Winslow,et al.  Programming pedagogy—a psychological overview , 1996, SGCS.

[4]  J. Novak,et al.  The use of concept mapping and knowledge vee mapping with junior high school science students , 1983 .

[5]  P Eric,et al.  Concept Mapping: a Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship Between Concepts , 1997 .

[6]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[7]  C. A. Moore,et al.  Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Educational Implications , 1977 .

[8]  Jiunde Lee The effects of information conveying approaches and cognitive styles on learners' structural knowledge and perceived disorientation in a hypermedia environment , 2000 .

[9]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs. system expertise , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Chin-chang Ch en,et al.  Using similarity ratings and the pathfinder algorithm for evaluating students' cognitive structures in Newtonian mechanics / , 1996 .

[11]  Ling-Hsiu Chen,et al.  Web-based learning programs: Use by learners with various cognitive styles , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[12]  E. Plotnick Concept Mapping: A Graphical System for Understanding the Relationship between Concepts. ERIC Digest. , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Alternative Assessment Approaches for Online Learning Environments in Higher Education , 2000 .

[14]  Karen Fullerton,et al.  The interactive effects of field dependence-independence and internet document manipulation style on student achievement from computer-based instruction , 2000 .

[15]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Comparison of Content Structure and Cognitive Structure in High School Students' Learning of Probability. , 1975 .

[16]  E. Yalow On Educational psychology: A cognitive view. , 1979 .

[17]  K. Klein,et al.  Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy , 2006 .

[18]  Wilfred W. F. Lau,et al.  Promoting conceptual change of learning sorting algorithm through the diagnosis of mental models: The effects of gender and learning styles , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. , 1991 .

[20]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Pathfinder associative networks: studies in knowledge organization , 1990 .

[21]  H. Suen,et al.  Concept Map Assessment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity, and Logistical Practicality , 1999 .

[22]  R. Kozma,et al.  Individuality in learning. , 1978 .

[23]  Bernard M. Frank,et al.  The Effect of Learners' Field Independence, Cognitive Strategy Instruction, and Inherent Word-List Organization on Free-Recall Memory and Strategy Use , 1993 .

[24]  Peder J. Johnson,et al.  Assessing Structural Knowledge. , 1991 .

[25]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  A longitudinal study of invention and understanding in children's multidigit addition and subtraction , 1998 .

[26]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Evaluating Cognitive Training Outcomes: Validity and Utility of Structural Knowledge Assessment , 2003 .

[27]  Jenenne A Geske The structure of introductory statistics knowledge: An investigation exploring students' and experts' cognitive organization using multidimensional scaling and pathfinder analyses , 2001 .

[28]  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin,et al.  Inferring students' cognitive structures and their development using the "ordered tree technique." , 1986 .

[29]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[30]  Annemarie Hauf,et al.  Computers in education , 1983 .

[31]  Elizabeth S. Charles,et al.  Acquisition of Complex Systemic Thinking: Mental Models of Evolution , 2004 .

[32]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Recall and Measures of Memory Organization , 1986 .

[33]  D. Goodenough The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Towards new forms of knowledge communication: the adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Rayford B. Vaughn,et al.  Software requirement understanding using Pathfinder networks: discovering and evaluating mental models , 2005, J. Syst. Softw..

[36]  C. W. Tate Solve it. , 2005, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[37]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[38]  Bruce A. Leauby,et al.  Concept mapping: Potential uses in accounting education , 1998 .

[39]  Sanghee Yeo Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[40]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: an individual differences approach , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[41]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[42]  L. Housner,et al.  Conceptual Maps and Simulated Teaching Episodes as Indicators of Competence in Teaching Elementary Mathematics , 1996 .

[43]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Predicting judgment time from measures of psychological proximity. , 1992 .

[44]  Stanley F. Biggs,et al.  Priming/Reaction-Time Evidence of the Structure of Auditors’ Knowledge of Financial Statement Errors , 2010 .

[45]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[46]  B. Ober,et al.  Well-organized conceptual domains in Alzheimer's disease , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[47]  Dennis B. Beringer,et al.  Priority and Organization of Information Accessed by Pilots in Various Phases of Flight , 2001 .

[48]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  Assessing knowledge structure in accounting education: an application of Pathfinder Associative Networks , 2003 .

[49]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[50]  Anna M. Rose,et al.  Measurement of knowledge structures acquired through instruction, experience, and decision aid use , 2007, Int. J. Account. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Effects of Computer Programming Experience on Network Representations of Abstract Programming Concepts , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[52]  Ralph E. Viator,et al.  An Investigation of Multidimensional Knowledge Structure and Computer Auditor Performance , 2000 .

[53]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Navigation in hypermedia learning systems: experts vs. novices , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..