Multi-criteria analysis for locating new urban forests: An example from Isparta, Turkey

Abstract The concept of the urban forest is new for Turkey. Since many areas of Turkey are rapidly converting to urban and suburban landscapes, maintaining existing greenspace or creating new greenspace is important. Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) was used to determine the most suitable area for creating new urban forest in Isparta, Turkey, employing the approach used in Ghent, Belgium (Van Elegem et al., 2002. A methodology to select the best locations for new urban forests using multi-criteria analysis. Forestry 75, 13–22.). There are three stages in the MCA, the initial selection stage, the suitability stage, and the feasibility stage. In each stage, potential areas are evaluated according to several criteria. In the suitability stage, criteria are grouped according to three themes of the urban forest profile, recreational, ecological, and structure strengthening. The recreational theme was weighted more heavily than the others because surveys had shown this to be an important consideration for residents and greenspace management experts in Isparta. A sensitivity analysis did not show any change in the overall results as a consequence of the weighting. The two areas most appropriate for the creation of new urban forest in Isparta received high scores in the recreational theme due to their proximity to the city center. The flexibility of MCA was useful in adjusting criteria in each stage to adapt to contextual changes in Isparta. The flexibility of MCA should also expedite its application for other communities interested in creating new areas of urban forest. Application in other communities will probably require changing criteria, sub-criteria, and indicators according to local conditions and priorities. Input from local stakeholders facilitated the MCA and was likely an important reason that the results of the MCA were enthusiastically received by local officials and planners.

[1]  J. L. Morrison,et al.  Can Urban Parks Provide Habitat For Woodpeckers? , 2005 .

[2]  A. Gül,et al.  An Approach for Recreation Suitability Analysis to Recreation Planning in Gölcük Nature Park , 2006, Environmental management.

[3]  Martin Hermy,et al.  Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium , 2002 .

[4]  F. Steiner,et al.  Land suitability analysis for the upper Gila River watershed. , 2000 .

[5]  A. Lindhagen.  Forest recreation in Sweden. Four case studies using quantitative and qualitative methods. , 1996 .

[6]  Gordon A. Bradley,et al.  Urban forest landscapes : integrating multidisciplinary perspectives , 1995 .

[7]  C. Konijnendijk.  A Short History of Urban Forestry in Europe , 1997, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[8]  J. Kuser.  Handbook of Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast , 2000, Springer US.

[9]  C. Konijnendijk.  A decade of urban forestry in Europe , 2003 .

[10]  Annika Kangas,et al.  MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state‐owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences , 2001 .

[11]  F. T. Manen,et al.  A GIS model to predict black bear habitat use , 1997 .

[12]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analyse , 1991 .

[13]  Florent Joerin,et al.  Using GIS and outranking multicriteria analysis for land-use suitability assessment , 2001, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[14]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning , 1990 .

[15]  Mohammad Sharifi,et al.  Application of GIS and multicriteria evaluation in locating sustainable boundary between the tunari National Park and Cochabamba City (Bolivia) , 2002 .

[16]  Bart Muys,et al.  A methodology to select the best locations for new urban forests using multicriteria analysis , 2002 .

[17]  T. M. Gehring,et al.  SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF COYOTES ALONG A SUBURBAN-TO-RURAL GRADIENT , 2004 .

[18]  V. Rudis.  Regional forest fragmentation effects on bottomland hardwood community types and resource values , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  Steve Carter.  Site search and multicriteria evaluation , 1991 .

[20]  C. Konijnendijk.  Urban forestry : Comparative analysis of policies and concepts in Europe; Contemporary urban forest policy-making in selected cities and countries of Europe , 1999 .

[21]  V. Rudis.  Recreational use of forested areas by Alabama residents , 1987 .

[22]  Ron Janssen,et al.  On the use of multi‐criteria analysis in environmental impact assessment in The Netherlands , 2001 .

[23]  Richard Wilson Harris,et al.  Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs, and Vines , 1991 .

[24]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest , 1992, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.