Changes in variance and correlation of soil properties with scale and location: analysis using an adapted maximal overlap discrete wavelet transform

Summary The magnitude of variation in soil properties can change from place to place, and this lack of stationarity can preclude conventional geostatistical and spectral analysis. In contrast, wavelets and their scaling functions, which take non-zero values only over short intervals and are therefore local, enable us to handle such variation. Wavelets can be used to analyse scale-dependence and spatial changes in the correlation of two variables where the linear model of coregionalization is inadmissible. We have adapted wavelet methods to analyse soil properties with non-stationary variation and covariation in fairly small sets of data, such as we can expect in soil survey, and we have applied them to measurements of pH and the contents of clay and calcium carbonate on a 3-km transect in Central England. Places on the transect where significant changes in the variance of the soil properties occur were identified. The scale-dependence of the correlations of soil properties was investigated by calculating wavelet correlations for each spatial scale. We identified where the covariance of the properties appeared to change and then computed the wavelet correlations on each side of the change point and compared them. The correlation of topsoil and subsoil clay content was found to be uniform along the transect at one important scale, although there were significant changes in the variance. In contrast, carbonate content and pH of the topsoil were correlated only in parts of the transect.

[1]  Ole Wendroth,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and describing spatial processes in agricultural landscapes : four case studies , 2001 .

[2]  Brandon J. Whitcher,et al.  Assessing Nonstationary Time Series Using Wavelets , 1998 .

[3]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  The discrete wavelet transform and the scale analysis of the surface properties of sea ice , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Soil Electrical Conductivity as a Crop Productivity Measure for Claypan Soils , 1999 .

[5]  R. M. Lark,et al.  Analysis and elucidation of soil variation using wavelets , 1999 .

[6]  R. Webster,et al.  Coregionalization of trace metals in the soil in the Swiss Jura , 1994 .

[7]  J. Durbin,et al.  Techniques for Testing the Constancy of Regression Relationships Over Time , 1975 .

[8]  R. Lark,et al.  Classification as a first step in the interpretation of temporal and spatial variation of crop yield , 1997 .

[9]  G. Matheron The intrinsic random functions and their applications , 1973, Advances in Applied Probability.

[10]  Donald P. Percival,et al.  On estimation of the wavelet variance , 1995 .

[11]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Scale-dependent correlation between topsoil copper and cobalt concentrations in Scotland , 1994 .

[12]  Marc Voltz,et al.  A comparison of kriging, cubic splines and classification for predicting soil properties from sample information , 1990 .

[13]  Peter Guttorp,et al.  Wavelet analysis of covariance with application to atmospheric time series , 2000 .

[14]  Peter Guttorp,et al.  Long-Memory Processes, the Allan Variance and Wavelets , 1994 .

[15]  I. Daubechies,et al.  Wavelets on the Interval and Fast Wavelet Transforms , 1993 .

[16]  Richard Webster,et al.  Is soil variation random , 2000 .

[17]  U. Depczynski,et al.  Sturm–Liouville Wavelets , 1998 .

[18]  I. Daubechies Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets , 1988 .

[19]  Richard Webster,et al.  SOIL TRANSECT CORRELOGRAMS OF NORTH OXFORDSHIRE AND THEIR INTERPRETATION , 1975 .

[20]  Tom Addiscott,et al.  New paradigms for modelling mass transfers in soils , 1998 .