Individual differences in Sternberg's memory scanning task.

This study provides a new perspective on both the cognitive processes actually implemented and the effect of a simple experimental control - the recall constraint - in Sternberg's memory scanning task. These findings were highlighted by adopting a new approach based on the comparison of qualitative and quantitative results. The analysis of individual processing, on 72 adults, each participating in one of two experimental conditions (with or without sequence recall), highlighted a large variability in quantitative results as well as qualitative procedures. Based on the participants' retrospective verbalisations, two categories of strategies were identified: (1) the procedures used to memorize the sequence of digits, and (2) the procedures used to compare this sequence with the test digit, which includes strategies for coding the items and processes for searching them in memory. The analysis of the strategies shows that their frequencies of use depend not only on the experimental condition, but also on the participants, the level of task difficulty and the interaction between participants and level of difficulty. This variability questions the accuracy of Sternberg's mean model. Furthermore, this approach suggests some answers to the old debate concerning the exhaustive search pattern for the yes response. Indeed, our results show three types of strategies that can be identified according to the different models of search suggested in the literature. The "exhaustive" search, that would only be involved in the recall condition and only for some of the participants, the "self-terminating" search and the "immediate" strategy, which can be identified with a model of parallel search with limited resources. Thus our study suggests that the different search models are appropriate but depend on both the specific experimental conditions and participant's strategy. Our results should help to improve the interpretation of data collected with this paradigm in cognitive and neuroscientific studies of memory.

[1]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Exemplar similarity, study list homogeneity, and short-term perceptual recognition , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[2]  B. Postle,et al.  Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Effect of syllabic word length on memory-search rate. , 1973 .

[4]  Xingchang Wei,et al.  Posterior fossa lesion volume and slowed information processing in multiple sclerosis. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J. Townsend,et al.  On the costs and benefits of faces and words: process characteristics of feature search in highly meaningful stimuli. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Dissociating Age-related Changes in Cognitive Strategy and Neural Efficiency Using Event- related fMRI , 2005, Cortex.

[7]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Processing time as influenced by the number of elements in a visual display , 1969 .

[8]  R. Kail,et al.  CHAPTER 8 – Cognitive Strategies , 1982 .

[9]  Ronald Okada,et al.  Parallel Scanning of Semantic and Formal Information. , 1973 .

[10]  J. Townsend,et al.  Search reaction time for single targets in multiletter stimuli with brief visual displays , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[11]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[12]  E. Hunt.  Mechanics of Verbal Ability. , 1978 .

[13]  J. M. Puckett,et al.  Individual differences and models of memory span: A role for memory search rate? , 1984 .

[14]  S. Sternberg.  Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[15]  A Wingfield.  Effects of serial position and set size in auditory recognition memory , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[16]  R. Siegler.  The perils of averaging data over strategies: An example from children's addition. , 1987 .

[17]  Matti Laine,et al.  Brain oscillatory responses to an auditory-verbal working memory task in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[18]  Ronald Okada,et al.  Serial position effects in high-speed memory search , 1971 .

[19]  J. Kwon,et al.  N-Methyl-d-aspartate receptor in working memory impairments in schizophrenia: event-related potential study of late stage of working memory process , 2003, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  J. Townsend,et al.  Self-terminating versus exhaustive processes in rapid visual and memory search: An evaluative review , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  R. Knight,et al.  Prefrontal and posterior cortical activation during auditory working memory. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  J. Lisman,et al.  Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12 Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  L D Blumhardt,et al.  Which event-related potentials reflect memory processing in a digit-probe identification task? , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Strategy in high-speed memory search. , 1970 .

[25]  J. Marquer.  Reaction Times and Verbal Reports in the Study of Cognitive Strategies: A Reply to Evans , 1990 .

[26]  E. Hunt,et al.  Individual Differences in Cognition: A New Approach to Intelligence , 1973 .

[27]  A. Newell.  You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .

[28]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Reaction Time and Short-term Memory: Implications of Repetition Effects for the High-speed Exhaustive Scan Hypothesis * , 1973 .

[29]  M. Corballis,et al.  Access to elements of a memorized list , 1972 .

[30]  Robert C. Calfee,et al.  Modality and similarity effects in short-term recognition memory. , 1969 .

[31]  Barry Fowler,et al.  The differential effects of Sternberg short- and long-term memory scanning on the late Nd and P300 in a dual-task paradigm. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  L. Corbin,et al.  Effect of a simple experimental control: The recall constraint in Sternberg's memory scanning task , 2008 .

[33]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[34]  S. Sternberg.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 1966, Science.

[35]  J. Theios,et al.  Memory scanning as a serial self-terminating process , 1973 .

[36]  M. Manosevitz,et al.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 2022 .

[37]  J. Marquer,et al.  Reaction Times in the Study of Strategies in Sentence–Picture Verification: A Reconsideration , 1990 .

[38]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[39]  R. Sternberg.  Advances in the psychology of human intelligence , 1982 .

[40]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  High-speed memory retrieval with auditorily presented stimuli , 1971 .

[41]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Memory scans based on alternative test stimulus representations , 1970 .

[42]  Mario Fifić,et al.  Parallel versus serial processing and individual differences in high-speed search in human memory , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Kim Kirsner,et al.  A within-subjects analysis of the relationship between memory span and processing rate in short-term memory , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[45]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Synchronous neural oscillations and cognitive processes , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  R C Atkinson,et al.  Individual differences and interrelationships among a select set of cognitive skills , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[47]  S. Monsell.  Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.