Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: moral imperatives or personal decisions?

Indian and American adults' and children's (N = 400) moral reasoning about hypothetical situations in which an agent failed to help someone experiencing either life-threatening, moderately serious, or minor need was compared. For 1/3 of Ss, the agent's relationship to the needy other was portrayed as that of parent; for another 1/3, as that of best friend; for the rest, as that of stranger. Indians tended to regard the failure to aid another in moral terms in all conditions. In contrast, Americans tended to view it in moral terms only in life-threatening cases or in cases of parents responding to the moderately serious needs of their children. The results imply that Indian culture forwards a broader and more stringent view of social responsibilities than does American culture. Discussion centers on theoretical implications of the various cultural, need, role, and developmental effects observed.

[1]  Joan G. Miller,et al.  Issues of Interpersonal Responsibility and Accountability: A Comparison of Indians' and Americans' Moral Judgments , 1989 .

[2]  H. Triandis.  The Self and Social Behavior in Differing Cultural Contexts , 1989 .

[3]  Sharon Lamb,et al.  The Emergence of Morality in Young Children , 1988 .

[4]  Joan G. Miller.  Cultural influences on the development of conceptual differentiation in person description , 1987 .

[5]  J. Smetana,et al.  Korean children's conceptions of moral and conventional transgressions. , 1987 .

[6]  Melanie Killen,et al.  Morality: Its structure, functions, and vagaries. , 1987 .

[7]  Arjun Appadurai,et al.  is homo hierarchicus , 1986 .

[8]  Joan G. Miller.  Early Cross-Cultural Commonalities in Social Explanation. , 1986 .

[9]  R. Edelmann,et al.  Book reviewThe anatomy of relationships: M. Argyle and M. Henderson: Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, Middx. (1985). 359 Pages, £3.95. , 1986 .

[10]  Nancy Eisenberg,et al.  Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior , 1986 .

[11]  E. Turiel,et al.  Children's Concepts of Cross-Gender Activities. , 1985 .

[12]  Joan G. Miller.  Culture and the Development of Everyday Social Explanation , 1984 .

[13]  William M. Kurtines,et al.  Morality, moral behavior, and moral development , 1984 .

[14]  E. Turiel,et al.  The Development of Social Knowledge: Morality and Convention , 1983 .

[15]  Charles Levine,et al.  Moral stages: A current formulation and a response to critics. , 1983 .

[16]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice. Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1982. , 1982 .

[17]  M. Powers.  Measures Of Socioeconomic Status: Current Issues , 1982 .

[18]  J. Smetana.  Concepts of Self and Morality: Women's Reasoning About Abortion , 1982 .

[19]  Richard A. Shweder,et al.  Beyond self-constructed knowledge: The study of culture and morality. , 1982 .

[20]  J. Smetana.  Preschool children's conceptions of moral and social rules. , 1981 .

[21]  Larry Nucci,et al.  Conceptions of Personal Issues: A Domain Distinct from Moral or Societal Concepts. , 1981 .

[22]  L. Kohlberg.  The Philosophy of Moral Development Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice , 1981 .

[23]  David M. Schneider,et al.  American Kinship: A Cultural Account , 1980 .

[24]  J. Derrett,et al.  The Concept of Duty in South Asia , 1980, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[25]  Carol Gilligan,et al.  Moral development in late adolescence and adulthood: A critique and reconstruction of Kohlberg's theory. , 1980 .

[26]  Sudhir Kakar,et al.  The Inner World: A Psycho-Analytic Study of Childhood and Society in India. , 1979, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[27]  Adina Schwartz,et al.  Reason and Morality , 1979 .

[28]  C. Gilligan.  In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and of morality. , 1977 .

[29]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  The Justice of Need and the Activation of Humanitarian Norms , 1975 .

[30]  V. J. McGill,et al.  Cognitive Development and Epistemology , 1971 .

[31]  L. Kohlberg.  From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with , 1971 .

[32]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  Responsibility and dependency. , 1963 .

[33]  Donal E. Muir,et al.  The Social Debt: An Investigation of Lower-Class and Middle-Class Norms of Social Obligation , 1962 .