Is greener better? Associations between greenness and birth outcomes in both urban and non-urban settings.

BACKGROUND Beneficial effects of greenness on birth outcomes have been reported, but few studies have investigated the associations in both urban and non-urban settings. We aimed to evaluate and compare linear and nonlinear associations between greenness and birth outcomes in urban and non-urban settings. METHODS From October 2015 to December 2018, participants were recruited into the Maoming Birth Cohort Study. A total of 11 258 live birth records were obtained. Greenness exposure was assessed using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI). Linear regression and nonlinear restricted cubic spline models were implemented to investigate the associations between greenness and birthweight, birth length, gestational age, preterm birth, low birthweight, small for gestational age and the potential for effect variation under urban or non-urban settings, after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS A 0.1-unit increase in NDVI-500m was significantly associated with an increase of 35.4 g in birthweight [95% confidence interval (CI): 13.2, 57.7], 0.15 cm in birth length (95% CI: 0.03, 0.26), 0.88 days in gestational age (95% CI: 0.05, 1.71) and lower odds of low birthweight [odds ratio (OR) = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.85] and preterm birth (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.85). No association with head circumference was observed. For all outcomes, no significant linear associations were observed among non-urban dwellers. Inversed 'U-shaped' associations between greenness exposure and birth outcomes were observed in the total study population. CONCLUSIONS Greenness exposure was associated with increased gestational age, birthweight and birth length in urban dwellers. Nonlinear associations assessed by restricted cubic splines suggested that health benefits could be larger when increasing greenness levels from low to medium compared with increasing greenness from medium to high levels. Further studies adopting nonlinear methods are warranted to verify our findings.

[1]  Jun Wu,et al.  Associations between green space and preterm birth: Windows of susceptibility and interaction with air pollution. , 2020, Environment international.

[2]  Deepti Adlakha,et al.  Mind the gap: Gender differences in walkability, transportation and physical activity in urban India , 2020 .

[3]  Yu Jiang,et al.  Influence of residential greenness on adverse pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[4]  Xiaoqi Feng,et al.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Associations between Green and Blue Spaces and Birth Outcomes , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[5]  S. Lacagnina.  The Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) , 2019, American journal of lifestyle medicine.

[6]  Ping Yin.  Comparison of greenness measures in assessing the association between urban residential greenness and birth weight , 2019 .

[7]  L. Morawska,et al.  Greenness around schools associated with lower risk of hypertension among children: Findings from the Seven Northeastern Cities Study in China. , 2019, Environmental pollution.

[8]  P. Lercher,et al.  Associations of residential greenness, traffic noise, and air pollution with birth outcomes across Alpine areas. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[9]  Geoffrey H. Donovan,et al.  The natural environment and birth outcomes: Comparting 3D exposure metrics derived from LiDAR to 2D metrics based on the normalized difference vegetation index. , 2019, Health & place.

[10]  O. Gruzieva,et al.  Neighbourhood greenness and birth outcomes in a Swedish birth cohort - A short communication. , 2019, Health & place.

[11]  Itamar M. Lensky,et al.  Mean and variance of greenness and pregnancy outcomes in Tel Aviv during 2000-14: longitudinal and cross-sectional approaches. , 2018, International journal of epidemiology.

[12]  J. Schwartz,et al.  Residential Greenness and Birthweight in the State of Massachusetts, USA , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[13]  M. Phipps,et al.  Residential green space and birth outcomes in a coastal setting , 2018, Environmental research.

[14]  K. Day.  Physical Environment Correlates of Physical Activity in Developing Countries: A Review. , 2017, Journal of physical activity & health.

[15]  S. Kochhar,et al.  Small for gestational age: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunisation safety data , 2017, Vaccine.

[16]  I. Kloog,et al.  Interrelationships Between Walkability, Air Pollution, Greenness, and Body Mass Index , 2017, Epidemiology.

[17]  M. Brauer,et al.  Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance , 2017, Environmental research.

[18]  P. Hystad,et al.  Associations between multiple green space measures and birth weight across two US cities , 2017, Health & place.

[19]  S. McLafferty,et al.  Green Streets: Urban Green and Birth Outcomes , 2017, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[20]  Harvard T. H. Chan,et al.  International Journal of Women's Health Dovepress Residential Greenness: Current Perspectives on Its Impact on Maternal Health and Pregnancy Outcomes , 2022 .

[21]  B. Schwartz,et al.  Greenness and Birth Outcomes in a Range of Pennsylvania Communities , 2016, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[22]  M. Bell,et al.  Association between greenness, urbanicity, and birth weight. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  R. McEachan,et al.  The association between green space and depressive symptoms in pregnant women: moderating roles of socioeconomic status and physical activity , 2015, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[24]  Michael Brauer,et al.  Residential Greenness and Birth Outcomes: Evaluating the Influence of Spatially Correlated Built-Environment Factors , 2014, Environmental health perspectives.

[25]  J. Heinrich,et al.  A cross-sectional analysis of the effects of residential greenness on blood pressure in 10-year old children: results from the GINIplus and LISAplus studies , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[26]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[27]  X. Basagaña,et al.  Surrounding Greenness and Pregnancy Outcomes in Four Spanish Birth Cohorts , 2012, Environmental health perspectives.

[28]  Payam Dadvand,et al.  Green space, health inequality and pregnancy. , 2012, Environment international.

[29]  Ross C. Brownson,et al.  Perceived environmental correlates of physical activity for leisure and transportation in Curitiba, Brazil. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[30]  P. Braveman,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. , 2010, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  Gabriele Bolte,et al.  Environmental inequalities among children in Europe--evaluation of scientific evidence and policy implications. , 2010, European journal of public health.

[32]  Jeffrey S. Wilson,et al.  Neighborhood greenness and 2-year changes in body mass index of children and youth. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[33]  R. Godfrey,et al.  Urbanisation and health. , 2005, Clinical medicine.

[34]  M C McCormick,et al.  The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  P. Hystad,et al.  Associations between residential greenness and birth outcomes across Texas , 2017, Environmental research.

[36]  A. Dzhambov,et al.  Association between residential greenness and birth weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis , 2014 .