The Utility of Display Space in Keeping Track of Rapidly Changing Information

The results of 4 experiments suggest that the information available in graphic displays can have considerable performance consequences and that the kind of display invariants provided can interact with variables such as task difficulty, working-memory load, and the organization of information that is to be remembered. In Experiment 1, participants benefited from the presence of invariant spatial correlates of values to be remembered and showed superior performance (fewer errors and faster responses) relative to participants using a spatially impoverished display, regardless of information organization. Experiment 2 showed that the presence of unique verbal labels for items to be remembered aids keeping track performance. Experiments 3 and 4 provided further evidence that participants kept track of changing information best in conditions with spatial display invariants. These data are relevant to practitioners faced with designing soft monitoring displays - that is, displays involving multiple attributes of a single object in some cases (e.g., the temperature and pressure in a boiler) and one attribute of many objects in others (e.g., the current flow through several valves feeding the same system). Actual or potential applications of this research include improving computer displays designed to support complex, memoryintensive monitoring performance

[1]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[2]  C. Wickens.  Engineering psychology and human performance, 2nd ed. , 1992 .

[3]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[4]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Anthony D. Andre,et al.  Changing Technology in Control Room Design: Is One Graphical Interface Worth 1000 Indicators? , 1995 .

[6]  Mark C. Detweiler,et al.  A Connectionist/Control Architecture for Working Memory , 1988 .

[7]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[8]  Stephen M. Hess,et al.  The Effects of Display Layout on Monitoring and Updating System States , 1994 .

[9]  Jiajie Zhang,et al.  Representations in Distributed Cognitive Tasks , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  The role of rehearsal in short-term memory , 1973 .

[11]  David Woods,et al.  Situation Awareness: A Critical But Ill-Defined Phenomenon , 1991 .

[12]  D. Yntema,et al.  Keeping track of variables that have few or many states. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Michael Venturino,et al.  Dynamic Memory: Keeping Track of Continually Changing Information , 1994 .

[14]  Jerrold M. Levine,et al.  Measurement of Workload by Secondary Tasks , 1979 .

[15]  D B YNTEMA,et al.  Keeping Track of Several Things at Once1 , 1963, Human factors.

[16]  Stephen M. Hess,et al.  The Effects of Response Alternatives on Keeping Track Performance , 1995 .

[17]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[18]  W. Kirchner.  Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. , 1958, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  Alan D. Baddeley,et al.  Developments in the concept of working memory. , 1994 .

[20]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[21]  R T Zacks.  Encoding strategies used by young and elderly adults in a keeping track task. , 1982, Journal of gerontology.

[22]  D. Yntema,et al.  Remembering the present states of a number of variables. , 1960, Journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  C D Wickens,et al.  Codes and Modalities in Multiple Resources: A Success and a Qualification , 1988, Human factors.

[24]  D. Damos.  Multiple-task performance , 2020 .