Comparing satellite- to ground-based automated and manual cloud coverage observations – a case study

Abstract. In this case study we compare cloud fractional cover measured by radiometers on polar satellites (AVHRR) and on one geostationary satellite (SEVIRI) to ground-based manual (SYNOP) and automated observations by a cloud camera (Hemispherical Sky Imager, HSI). These observations took place in Hannover, Germany, and in Lauder, New Zealand, over time frames of 3 and 2 months, respectively. Daily mean comparisons between satellite derivations and the ground-based HSI found the deviation to be 6 ± 14% for AVHRR and 8 ± 16% for SEVIRI, which can be considered satisfactory. AVHRR's instantaneous differences are smaller (2 ± 22%) than instantaneous SEVIRI cloud fraction estimates (8 ± 29%) when compared to HSI due to resolution and scenery effect issues. All spaceborne observations show a very good skill in detecting completely overcast skies (cloud cover g 6 oktas) with probabilities between 92 and 94% and false alarm rates between 21 and 29% for AVHRR and SEVIRI in Hannover, Germany. In the case of a clear sky (cloud cover lower than 3 oktas) we find good skill with detection probabilities between 72 and 76%. We find poor skill, however, whenever broken clouds occur (probability of detection is 32% for AVHRR and 12% for SEVIRI in Hannover, Germany). In order to better understand these discrepancies we analyze the influence of algorithm features on the satellite-based data. We find that the differences between SEVIRI and HSI cloud fractional cover (CFC) decrease (from a bias of 8 to almost 0%) with decreasing number of spatially averaged pixels and decreasing index which determines the cloud coverage in each "cloud-contaminated" pixel of the binary map. We conclude that window size and index need to be adjusted in order to improve instantaneous SEVIRI and AVHRR estimates. Due to its automated operation and its spatial, temporal and spectral resolution, we recommend as well that more automated ground-based instruments in the form of cloud cameras should be installed as they cover larger areas of the sky than other automated ground-based instruments. These cameras could be an essential supplement to SYNOP observation as they cover the same spectral wavelengths as the human eye.

[1]  Bruce A. Wielicki,et al.  Satellite Instrument Calibration for Measuring Global Climate Change: Report of a Workshop , 2004 .

[2]  Wei Guo,et al.  Comparison of AVHRR-Based Global Data Records , 2011 .

[3]  M. Nardino,et al.  Cloud cover classification through simultaneous ground-based measurements of solar and infrared radiation , 2002 .

[4]  D. Aminou.  MSG's SEVIRI instrument , 2002 .

[5]  J. L. Bosch,et al.  Cloud classification in a mediterranean location using radiation data and sky images , 2011 .

[6]  R. Roebeling,et al.  Toward a Standard Procedure for Validation of Satellite-Derived Cloud Liquid Water Path: A Study with SEVIRI Data , 2009 .

[7]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[8]  Karl-Göran Karlsson,et al.  NWCSAF AVHRR Cloud Detection and Analysis Using Dynamic Thresholds and Radiative Transfer Modeling. Part II: Tuning and Validation , 2005 .

[9]  Andreas Macke,et al.  Total and partial cloud amount detection during summer 2005 at Westerland (Sylt, Germany) , 2008 .

[10]  Rolf Philipona,et al.  Automatic cloud amount detection by surface longwave downward radiation measurements , 2004 .

[11]  Antonio Rodríguez Martínez,et al.  Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for “Precipitation products from Cloud Physical Properties” (PPh-PGE14: PCPh v1.0 & CRPh v1.0) , 2013 .

[12]  M. Derrien,et al.  MSG/SEVIRI cloud mask and type from SAFNWC , 2005 .

[13]  R. Saunders,et al.  An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data , 1988 .

[14]  B. Albrecht.  Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness , 1989, Science.

[15]  B. N. Wenny,et al.  Observed influence of clouds on ultraviolet‐B radiation , 1996 .

[16]  Louis Garand,et al.  Automated Recognition of Oceanic Cloud Patterns. Part I: Methodology and Application to Cloud Climatology , 1988 .

[17]  Louis Garand,et al.  Automated recognition of oceanic cloud patterns. II - Detection of air temperature and humidity anomalies above the ocean surface from satellite imagery , 1989 .

[18]  Joann Parikh,et al.  A comparative study of cloud classification techniques , 1977 .

[19]  Elizabeth E. Ebert,et al.  A Pattern Recognition Technique for Distinguishing Surface and Cloud Types in the Polar Regions , 1987 .

[20]  M. Derrien,et al.  Automatic cloud detection applied to NOAA-11 /AVHRR imagery , 1993 .

[21]  T. Nakashizuka,et al.  CLOUD COVER ESTIMATION USING MULTITEMPORAL HEMISPHERE IMAGERIES , 2004 .

[22]  S. M. Robaa,et al.  Evaluation of sunshine duration from cloud data in Egypt , 2008 .

[23]  Maximilian Reuter,et al.  The CM-SAF and FUB Cloud Detection Schemes for SEVIRI: Validation with Synoptic Data and Initial Comparison with MODIS and CALIPSO , 2009 .

[24]  George Economou,et al.  Cloud detection and classification with the use of whole-sky ground-based images , 2012 .

[25]  J. F. Meirink,et al.  CLAAS: the CM SAF cloud property data set using SEVIRI , 2014 .

[26]  Juergen Fischer,et al.  Generating cloudmasks in spatial high-resolution observations of clouds using texture and radiance information , 2002 .

[27]  Anestis Antoniadis,et al.  Statistical cloud detection from SEVIRI multispectral images , 2008 .

[28]  Karl-Göran Karlsson,et al.  NWCSAF AVHRR Cloud Detection and Analysis Using Dynamic Thresholds and Radiative Transfer Modeling. Part I: Algorithm Description , 2005 .

[29]  Charles N. Long,et al.  Optimized fractional cloudiness determination from five ground-based remote sensing techniques , 2010 .

[30]  Stanley Q. Kidder,et al.  Satellite Meteorology: An Introduction , 1995 .

[31]  J. Schmetz,et al.  AN INTRODUCTION TO METEOSAT SECOND GENERATION (MSG) , 2002 .

[32]  Robert Burgman,et al.  Observational and Model Evidence for Positive Low-Level Cloud Feedback , 2009, Science.

[33]  W. Menzel,et al.  Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS , 1998 .

[34]  C. Simmer,et al.  Effect of Cloud Types on the Earth Radiation Budget Calculated with the ISCCP Cl Dataset: Methodology and Initial Results , 1995 .

[35]  G. Seckmeyer,et al.  Measuring high-resolution sky luminance distributions with a CCD camera. , 2013, Applied optics.

[36]  Ronald M. Welch,et al.  Polar Cloud and Surface Classification Using AVHRR Imagery: An Intercomparison of Methods , 1992 .

[37]  B. Gao,et al.  Surface-induced brightness temperature variations and their effects on detecting thin cirrus clouds using IR emission channels in the 8-12 micrometer region , 1994 .

[38]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[39]  R. Betts,et al.  Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing. Chapter 2 , 2007 .

[40]  Vincenzo Levizzani,et al.  Cloud classification using METEOSAT VIS-IR imagery , 1992 .

[41]  Karl-Göran Karlsson,et al.  CLARA-A1: a cloud, albedo, and radiation dataset from 28 yr of global AVHRR data , 2013 .

[42]  MALBERG-lnstitut fur Meteorologie.  Comparison of Mean Cloud Cover Obtained By Satellite Photographs and Ground-Based Observations Over Europe and the Atlantic , 2003 .

[43]  Silas C. Michaelides,et al.  Multifeature texture analysis for the classification of clouds in satellite imagery , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[44]  V. Cuomo,et al.  Multilayered cloud parameters retrievals from combined infrared and microwave satellite observations , 2007 .

[45]  Luca Bugliaro,et al.  Ground-based observations for the validation of contrails and cirrus detection in satellite imagery , 2009 .

[46]  Josep Calbó,et al.  Empirical studies of cloud effects on UV radiation: A review , 2005 .