Evaluation of a wireless activity monitoring system to quantify locomotor activity in horses in experimental settings

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY Methods of evaluating locomotor activity can be useful in efforts to quantify behavioural activity in horses objectively. OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether an accelerometric device would be adequate to quantify locomotor activity and step frequency in horses, and to distinguish between different levels of activity and different gaits. STUDY DESIGN Observational study in an experimental setting. METHODS Dual-mode (activity and step count) piezo-electric accelerometric devices were placed at each of 4 locations (head, withers, forelimb and hindlimb) in each of 6 horses performing different controlled activities including grazing, walking at different speeds, trotting and cantering. Both the activity count and step count were recorded and compared by the various activities. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance for repeated measures, receiver operating characteristic curves, Bland-Altman analysis and linear regression. RESULTS The accelerometric device was able to quantify locomotor activity at each of the 4 locations investigated and to distinguish between gaits and speeds. The activity count recorded by the accelerometer placed on the hindlimb was the most accurate, displaying a clear discrimination between the different levels of activity and a linear correlation to speed. The accelerometer placed on the head was the only one to distinguish specifically grazing behaviour from standing. The accelerometer placed on the withers was unable to differentiate different gaits and activity levels. The step count function measured at the hindlimb was reliable but the count was doubled at the walk. CONCLUSIONS The dual-mode accelerometric device was sufficiently accurate to quantify and compare locomotor activity in horses moving at different speeds and gaits. Positioning the device on the hindlimb allowed for the most accurate results. The step count function can be useful but must be manually corrected, especially at the walk.

[1]  H. Whay,et al.  Effects of acepromazine, butorphanol and buprenorphine on thermal and mechanical nociceptive thresholds in horses. , 2012, Equine veterinary journal.

[2]  Amanda K. Warren-Smith,et al.  The use of pedometers to estimate motor laterality in grazing horses , 2010 .

[3]  Raymond C Boston,et al.  Use of an activity monitor to detect response to treatment in dogs with osteoarthritis. , 2010, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[4]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[5]  Athan P. Papailiou,et al.  Behaviors in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) associated with activity counts measured by accelerometer , 2008, American journal of primatology.

[6]  G. Hoffmann,et al.  Influence of an active stable system on the behavior and body condition of Icelandic horses. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[7]  Kathryn E Michel,et al.  Determination and application of cut points for accelerometer-based activity counts of activities with differing intensity in pet dogs. , 2011, American journal of veterinary research.

[8]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[9]  R. Refinetti,et al.  Temporal relationships of 21 physiological variables in horse and sheep. , 2005, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[10]  Shirley Bryan,et al.  Validity of the Actical accelerometer step-count function. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  P. Taylor,et al.  Effects of dopamine antagonists on alfentanil-induced locomotor activity in horses. , 2003, Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.

[12]  N. Kemper,et al.  Pedometers as supervision tools for mares in the prepartal period , 2014 .

[13]  R. Clutton,et al.  Opioid analgesia in horses. , 2010, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Equine practice.

[14]  R. Brunsch,et al.  Activity Behavior of Horses Housed in Different Open Barn Systems , 2010 .

[15]  Emil Olsen,et al.  Accuracy and Precision of Equine Gait Event Detection during Walking with Limb and Trunk Mounted Inertial Sensors , 2012, Sensors.

[16]  E. Hill,et al.  Circadian regulation of locomotor activity and skeletal muscle gene expression in the horse. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  E. Steffey,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and selected pharmacodynamic effects of tramadol following intravenous administration to the horse. , 2013, Equine veterinary journal.

[18]  M. Love,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of signalment and body conformation on activity monitoring in companion dogs. , 2010, American journal of veterinary research.

[19]  G. Hosgood,et al.  Bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of oral and injectable formulations of methadone after intravenous, oral, and intragastric administration in horses. , 2012, American journal of veterinary research.

[20]  B. Slinker,et al.  Relationships between hoof-acceleration patterns of galloping horses and dynamic properties of the track. , 2005, American journal of veterinary research.

[21]  Heike Schulze Westerath,et al.  Gait determination and activity measurement in horses using an accelerometer , 2014 .

[22]  Joachim Krieter,et al.  Application of Wavelet Filtering to Analyze Acceleration-Time Curves of Horses Trotted on Different Surfaces , 2012 .

[23]  Stewart Trost,et al.  Accelerometer validity and placement for detection of changes in physical activity in dogs under controlled conditions on a treadmill. , 2012, Research in veterinary science.

[24]  S. Luna,et al.  Effects of buprenorphine on nociception and spontaneous locomotor activity in horses. , 2007, American journal of veterinary research.

[25]  B. Keene,et al.  Evaluation of an accelerometer for at-home monitoring of spontaneous activity in dogs. , 2007, American journal of veterinary research.

[26]  B. Lascelles,et al.  Evaluation of a digitally integrated accelerometer-based activity monitor for the measurement of activity in cats. , 2008, Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia.

[27]  K. Mama,et al.  Evaluation of the interaction of mu and kappa opioid agonists on locomotor behavior in the horse. , 1993, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.