Evolving Soft Robots in Tight Spaces

Soft robots have become increasingly popular in recent years -- and justifiably so. Their compliant structures and (theoretically) infinite degrees of freedom allow them to undertake tasks which would be impossible for their rigid body counterparts, such as conforming to uneven surfaces, efficiently distributing stress, and passing through small apertures. Previous work in the automated deign of soft robots has shown examples of these squishy creatures performing traditional robotic task like locomoting over flat ground. However, designing soft robots for traditional robotic tasks fails to fully utilize their unique advantages. In this work, we present the first example of a soft robot evolutionarily designed for reaching or squeezing through a small aperture -- a task naturally suited to its type of morphology. We optimize these creatures with the CPPN-NEAT evolutionary algorithm, introducing a novel implementation of the algorithm which includes multi-objective optimization while retaining its speciation feature for diversity maintenance. We show that more compliant and deformable soft robots perform more effectively at this task than their less flexible counterparts. This work serves mainly as a proof of concept, but we hope that it helps to open the door for the better matching of tasks with appropriate morphologies in robotic design in the future.

[1]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Evolving Neural Networks through Augmenting Topologies , 2002, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[3]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Automatic Design and Manufacture of Soft Robots , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[4]  Sung-Hoon Ahn,et al.  Review of manufacturing processes for soft biomimetic robots , 2009 .

[5]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Unshackling evolution: evolving soft robots with multiple materials and a powerful generative encoding , 2013, GECCO '13.

[6]  Joshua Evan Auerbach,et al.  Evolving CPPNs to grow three-dimensional physical structures , 2010, GECCO '10.

[7]  LipsonHod,et al.  Dynamic Simulation of Soft Multimaterial 3D-Printed Objects , 2014 .

[8]  SugiyamaYuuta,et al.  Crawling and Jumping by a Deformable Robot , 2006 .

[9]  Kenneth O. Stanley,et al.  Compositional Pattern Producing Networks : A Novel Abstraction of Development , 2007 .

[10]  Chris Rogers,et al.  Caterpillar locomotion: A new model for soft- bodied climbing and burrowing robots , 2006 .

[11]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Evolving multimodal behavior with modular neural networks in Ms. Pac-Man , 2014, GECCO.

[12]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Evolved Electrophysiological Soft Robots , 2014, ALIFE.

[14]  Kaspar Althoefer,et al.  Shrinkable, stiffness-controllable soft manipulator based on a bio-inspired antagonistic actuation principle , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[15]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[16]  Evert Haasdijk,et al.  Evolving intelligent vehicle control using multi-objective NEAT , 2013, 2013 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems (CIVTS).

[17]  Shinichi Hirai,et al.  Crawling and Jumping by a Deformable Robot , 2006, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[18]  Jimmy Secretan,et al.  Picbreeder: evolving pictures collaboratively online , 2008, CHI.

[19]  B Mazzolai,et al.  An octopus-bioinspired solution to movement and manipulation for soft robots , 2011, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[20]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Effective diversity maintenance in deceptive domains , 2013, GECCO '13.

[21]  John Rieffel,et al.  Growing and Evolving Soft Robots , 2014, Artificial Life.