Factor Analysis: Dealing with Response Bias

This paper proposes an innovative method for factor analyzing data that potentially contains individual response bias. Past methods include the use of “ipsative” data, or, related to that, “ipsatized” data. Unfortunately, factor analysis as the main method used for analyzing the dimensionality of data, cannot be applied to ipsative data. In contrast, normalization of data as an alternative method to filter out response bias, is not hampered by the technical statistical issues inherent to applying multivariate techniques to ipsative data. Using high-quality data from a survey in Nepal that makes use of – among others – the High-Performance Organizations (HPO) framework, this paper shows that the traditional approach of directly applying Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) starting from an existing model or theory, is inferior to our approach. Even applying Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to the raw (non-normalized) data before using CFA, is unable to detect the optimal dimensionality, or structure, in the data. A better structure can be obtained by performing EFA on normalized data that corrects for response bias in the raw data. This paper convincingly shows that the newly identified structure is superior to the original structure suggested by the HPO framework. Applying a CFA using the newly detected structure on the raw data, gives excellent goodness-of-fit statistics, with more items retained, and no need of forced methods to improve the model fit. The findings suggest that existing models and questionnaires based on these models, are not necessarily as valid and reliable as empirical studies that make use of traditional analyses seem to suggest. When adopting existing instruments, researchers are advised to critically check the validity and reliability of these instruments – especially those vulnerable to response bias - and to apply the procedures laid out in this paper, in order to enhance the quality of their research, and to inform future researchers who consider using the same instruments or to warn them about the potential shortcomings of these instruments.

[1]  Julia Moeller,et al.  A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: don't , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[2]  van Fm Frans Eijnatten,et al.  Ipsative measurement and the analysis of organizational values: an alternative approach for data analysis , 2014, Quality & Quantity.

[3]  A. D. Waal,et al.  Is the high performance organization framework suitable for Thai organizations , 2013 .

[4]  A. D. Waal,et al.  Achieving High Performance in the Public Sector , 2010 .

[5]  M. Matsunaga How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. , 2010 .

[6]  André de Waal,et al.  High Performance in Vietnam: The Case of the Vietnamese Banking Industry , 2009 .

[7]  A. D. Waal,et al.  The characteristics of a high performance organization , 2007 .

[8]  D. Moskowitz,et al.  Unfolding interpersonal behavior. , 2005, Journal of personality.

[9]  James C. Hayton,et al.  Factor Retention Decisions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: a Tutorial on Parallel Analysis , 2004 .

[10]  S. T. Hunt,et al.  A COMPARISON OF IPSATIVE AND NORMATIVE APPROACHES FOR ABILITY TO CONTROL FAKING IN PERSONALITY QUESTIONNAIRES , 2002 .

[11]  T. Berge,et al.  How to score questionnaires , 1998 .

[12]  S. Closs On the factoring and interpretation of ipsative data , 1996 .

[13]  Helen Baron,et al.  Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement , 1996 .

[14]  William P. Dunlap,et al.  On the questionable soundness of factoring ipsative data: A response to Saville & Willson (1991) , 1994 .

[15]  P. Saville,et al.  The reliability and validity of normative and ipsative approaches in the measurement of personality , 1991 .

[16]  Steve Blinkhorn,et al.  Spuriouser and spuriouser: The use of ipsative personality tests , 1988 .

[17]  B. Chissom,et al.  Factor Analysis (R-Technique) of Ipsatized Data May Be Misleading , 1981 .

[18]  Isabella C. M. Cunningham,et al.  The Ipsative Process to Reduce Response Set Bias , 1977 .

[19]  L. E. Hicks,et al.  Some properties of ipsative, normative, and forced-choice normative measures. , 1970 .

[20]  L. Gordon Validities of the forced-choice and questionnaire methods of personality measurement. , 1951 .

[21]  W. Chan,et al.  ANALYZING IPSATIVE DATA IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH , 2003 .

[22]  H. Kaiser,et al.  A Study Of A Measure Of Sampling Adequacy For Factor-Analytic Correlation Matrices. , 1977, Multivariate behavioral research.