Modeling Interdependent Networks as Random Graphs: Connectivity and Systemic Risk

Idealized models of interconnected networks can provide a laboratory for studying the consequences of interdependence in real-world networks, in particular those networks constituting society’s critical infrastructure. Here we show how random graph models of connectivity between networks can provide insights into shifts in percolation properties and into systemic risk. Tradeoffs abound in many of our results. For instance, edges between networks confer global connectivity using relatively few edges, and that connectivity can be beneficial in situations like communication or supplying resources, but it can prove dangerous if epidemics were to spread on the network. For a specific model of cascades of load in the system (namely, the sandpile model), we find that each network minimizes its risk of undergoing a large cascade if it has an intermediate amount of connectivity to other networks. Thus, connections among networks confer benefits and costs that balance at optimal amounts. However, what is optimal for minimizing cascade risk in one network is suboptimal for minimizing risk in the collection of networks. This work provides tools for modeling interconnected networks (or single networks with mesoscopic structure), and it provides hypotheses on tradeoffs in interdependence and their implications for systemic risk.

[1]  Tariq Samad,et al.  Automation, control and complexity: an integrated approach , 2000 .

[2]  I. Dobson,et al.  Initial review of methods for cascading failure analysis in electric power transmission systems IEEE PES CAMS task force on understanding, prediction, mitigation and restoration of cascading failures , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[3]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[5]  Béla Bollobás,et al.  A Probabilistic Proof of an Asymptotic Formula for the Number of Labelled Regular Graphs , 1980, Eur. J. Comb..

[6]  Stefano Battiston,et al.  Default Cascades: When Does Risk Diversification Increase Stability? , 2011 .

[7]  Raissa M. D'Souza,et al.  Transdisciplinary electric power grid science , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  John Scott What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[9]  M Barthelemy,et al.  Transport on coupled spatial networks. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[10]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[11]  Jukka-Pekka Onnela,et al.  Community Structure in Time-Dependent, Multiscale, and Multiplex Networks , 2009, Science.

[12]  Tang,et al.  Self-organized criticality. , 1988, Physical review. A, General physics.

[13]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Core-Periphery Structure in Networks , 2012, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[14]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Sandpile dynamics on random graphs , 1995 .

[15]  R. May,et al.  Systemic risk in banking ecosystems , 2011, Nature.

[16]  Maya Paczuski,et al.  Nonconservative earthquake model of self-organized criticality on a random graph. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[17]  B. Kahng,et al.  Sandpile avalanche dynamics on scale-free networks , 2004 .

[18]  Zoltán Toroczkai,et al.  Competition-driven network dynamics: emergence of a scale-free leadership structure and collective efficiency. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[19]  N. Taleb Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder , 2012 .

[20]  D Sornette,et al.  Anomalous power law distribution of total lifetimes of branching processes: application to earthquake aftershock sequences. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[21]  S. Battiston,et al.  Liaisons Dangereuses: Increasing Connectivity, Risk Sharing, and Systemic Risk , 2009 .

[22]  Deok-Sun Lee,et al.  Cascading toppling dynamics on scale-free networks , 2005 .

[23]  Steven M. Rinaldi,et al.  Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[24]  Pierre-André Noël,et al.  Controlling self-organizing dynamics on networks using models that self-organize. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[25]  Vittorio Rosato,et al.  Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models , 2008, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[26]  D. Turcotte,et al.  Forest fires: An example of self-organized critical behavior , 1998, Science.

[27]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[28]  Pierre-André Noël,et al.  Controlling self-organizing dynamics using models that self-organize , 2013 .

[29]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Vital Nodes, Interconnected Infrastructures, and the Geographies of Network Survivability , 2006 .

[30]  James P. Peerenboom,et al.  Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies , 2001 .

[31]  P. Hines,et al.  Do topological models provide good information about electricity infrastructure vulnerability? , 2010, Chaos.

[32]  Ian Dobson,et al.  A branching process approximation to cascading load-dependent system failure , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[33]  Harry Eugene Stanley,et al.  Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks , 2009, Nature.

[34]  Stefano Panzieri,et al.  Failures propagation in critical interdependent infrastructures , 2008, Int. J. Model. Identif. Control..

[35]  Brice V. Dupoyet,et al.  Replicating Financial Market Dynamics with a Simple Self-Organized Critical Lattice Model , 2010, 1010.4831.

[36]  Franklin Allen,et al.  Financial Contagion Journal of Political Economy , 1998 .

[37]  Richard G. Little,et al.  Controlling Cascading Failure: Understanding the Vulnerabilities of Interconnected Infrastructures , 2002 .

[38]  Bruce A. Reed,et al.  A Critical Point for Random Graphs with a Given Degree Sequence , 1995, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[39]  Mason A. Porter,et al.  Communities in Networks , 2009, ArXiv.

[40]  R. D’Souza,et al.  Percolation on interacting networks , 2009, 0907.0894.

[41]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[42]  V. Plerou,et al.  A theory of power-law distributions in financial market fluctuations , 2003, Nature.

[43]  B Kahng,et al.  Sandpile on scale-free networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[44]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[45]  Alexander M. Millkey The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable , 2009 .

[46]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  On a Paradox of Traffic Planning , 2005, Transp. Sci..

[47]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Risk Assessment in Complex Interacting Infrastructure Systems , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[48]  Jung Yeol Kim,et al.  Correlated multiplexity and connectivity of multiplex random networks , 2011, 1111.0107.

[49]  S. Hergarten,et al.  Landslides, sandpiles, and self-organized criticality , 2003 .

[50]  H. Herrmann,et al.  Self-organized criticality on small world networks , 2001, cond-mat/0110239.

[51]  Anna Scaglione,et al.  Generating Statistically Correct Random Topologies for Testing Smart Grid Communication and Control Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[52]  Leonardo Dueñas-Osorio,et al.  Cascading failures in complex infrastructure systems , 2009 .

[53]  Benjamin A Carreras,et al.  Complex systems analysis of series of blackouts: cascading failure, critical points, and self-organization. , 2007, Chaos.

[54]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Controllability of complex networks , 2011, Nature.

[55]  Javier A. Reyes,et al.  A network analysis of global banking , 2011 .

[56]  E A Leicht,et al.  Suppressing cascades of load in interdependent networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  M. Amin,et al.  National infrastructure as complex interactive networks , 2000 .

[58]  Paul Hines,et al.  A “Random Chemistry” Algorithm for Identifying Collections of Multiple Contingencies That Initiate Cascading Failure , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[59]  Jensen,et al.  Forest-fire models as a bridge between different paradigms in self-organized criticality , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[60]  N. Johnson,et al.  Theory of enhanced performance emerging in a sparsely connected competitive population. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[61]  L. Wang,et al.  Probabilistic interconnection between interdependent networks promotes cooperation in the public goods game , 2012, ArXiv.

[62]  Daniel S. Kirschen,et al.  Criticality in a cascading failure blackout model , 2006 .

[63]  Elizabeth Quill,et al.  When networks network: Once studied solo, systems display surprising behavior when they interact , 2012 .

[64]  Kyu-Min Lee,et al.  Sandpiles on multiplex networks , 2012 .

[65]  Kimmo Kaski,et al.  Sandpiles on Watts-Strogatz type small-worlds , 2005 .

[66]  Christian Borgs,et al.  Emergence of tempered preferential attachment from optimization , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.