Conceptual Approach to Unconventional Airship Design and Synthesis

This paper presents a novel design methodology to be used in the evaluation of the main features of advanced unconventional airship configuration. Similar to the process used in aircraft design, the concept of volume fractions (VF) is introduced to estimate airship weights, dimensions, and performances, in an early design phase. The paper presents the complete methodology, with tables and constants to help unconventional airship designers with preliminary design considerations. Volumes and weights of candidate solutions are obtained through an iterative method within a user-friendly tool requiring graphical and straightforward mathematical operations. The solutions are ranked based on procedures aiming at satisfying customer needs and expectations provided as inputs. A case study highlighting a step-by-step methodology process is presented, and the approach followed to select the final solution is documented. The method is easy to use and implement, rapidly providing a significant amount of data. A parametric approach is used such that the evolution in materials and technology, new configurations, and modern power and energetic solutions can be considered by simply performing a parameter sweep to perform sensitivity analysis.

[1]  Cameron Beach,et al.  High Strength-to-Weight Ratio Non-Woven Technical Fabrics for Aerospace Applications , 2009 .

[2]  Meyer Nahon,et al.  Analysis and Design of Robust Helium Aerostats , 2007 .

[3]  Eric Schall,et al.  Turbulence modeling challenges in airship CFD studies , 2003 .

[4]  David Grace,et al.  Improving the system capacity of broadband services using multiple high-altitude platforms , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[5]  Daren Yu,et al.  Configurations analysis for high‐altitude/long‐endurance airships , 2010 .

[6]  Manuela Battipede,et al.  Peculiar Performance of a New Lighter-Than-Air Platform for Monitoring , 2004 .

[7]  John D. Hunt.  Structural Analysis of Aerostat Flexible Structure by the Finite-Element Method , 1982 .

[8]  T. Lutz,et al.  Drag Reduction and Shape Optimization of Airship Bodies , 1998 .

[9]  Inna Sharf,et al.  Airship dynamics modeling: A literature review , 2011 .

[10]  Yiyuan Zhao,et al.  Development of an aerodynamic model and control law design for a high altitude airship , 2004 .

[11]  Rajkumar S. Pant,et al.  Initial Sizing and Sensitivity Analyses of Stratospheric Airships for Psuedolite Based Precision Navigation System , 2005 .

[12]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Design and marketing of new products , 1980 .

[13]  Enrico Cestino,et al.  Design of a High-Altitude Long-Endurance Solar-Powered Unmanned Air Vehicle for Multi-Payload and Operations , 2007 .

[14]  Ming Zhu,et al.  Analysis to Effects on Conceptual Parameters of Stratospheric Airship with Specified Factors , 2011, J. Comput..

[15]  Yung-Gyo Lee,et al.  Development of Korean High Altitude Platform Systems , 2006, Int. J. Wirel. Inf. Networks.

[16]  Peng Zhou,et al.  An approach for space launch vehicle conceptual design and multi-attribute evaluation , 2013 .

[17]  Miyoung Jeong,et al.  Quality function deployment: An extended framework for service quality and customer satisfaction in the hospitality industry , 1998 .

[18]  Rajkumar S. Pant.  A METHODOLOGY FOR DETERMINATION OF BASELINE SPECIFICATIONS OF A NON -RIGID AIRSHIP , 2008 .

[19]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[20]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Design Studies for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicles , 2008 .

[21]  Lin Liao,et al.  A review of airship structural research and development , 2009 .

[22]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[23]  Josué Jr. Guimarães Ramos,et al.  Airship dynamic modeling for autonomous operation , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.98CH36146).

[24]  Daniel P. Raymer,et al.  Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach , 1989 .

[25]  Lisa L. Kohout,et al.  High Altitude Long Endurance Air Vehicle Analysis of Alternatives and Technology Requirements Development , 2007 .

[26]  J. D. Delaurier,et al.  Aerodynamic estimation techniques for aerostats and airships , 1981 .

[27]  Zheng Wei,et al.  Stratospheric Airship Optimization Method and Design Parameters Sensitivity Analysis , 2007 .

[28]  Pavel Pechac,et al.  Coexistence of Terrestrial and HAP 3G Networks during Disaster Scenarios , 2008 .

[29]  Alessandro Ceruti,et al.  Airship Research and Development in the Areas of Design, Structures, Dynamics and Energy Systems , 2012 .