Evolution of complexity in RNA-like replicator systems

BackgroundThe evolution of complexity is among the most important questions in biology. The evolution of complexity is often observed as the increase of genetic information or that of the organizational complexity of a system. It is well recognized that the formation of biological organization – be it of molecules or ecosystems – is ultimately instructed by the genetic information, whereas it is also true that the genetic information is functional only in the context of the organization. Therefore, to obtain a more complete picture of the evolution of complexity, we must study the evolution of both information and organization.ResultsHere we investigate the evolution of complexity in a simulated RNA-like replicator system. The simplicity of the system allows us to explicitly model the genotype-phenotype-interaction mapping of individual replicators, whereby we avoid preconceiving the functionality of genotypes (information) or the ecological organization of replicators in the model. In particular, the model assumes that interactions among replicators – to replicate or to be replicated – depend on their secondary structures and base-pair matching. The results showed that a population of replicators, originally consisting of one genotype, evolves to form a complex ecosystem of up to four species. During this diversification, the species evolve through acquiring unique genotypes with distinct ecological functionality. The analysis of this diversification reveals that parasitic replicators, which have been thought to destabilize the replicator's diversity, actually promote the evolution of diversity through generating a novel "niche" for catalytic replicators. This also makes the current replicator system extremely stable upon the evolution of parasites. The results also show that the stability of the system crucially depends on the spatial pattern formation of replicators. Finally, the evolutionary dynamics is shown to significantly depend on the mutation rate.ConclusionThe interdependence of information and organization can play an important role for the evolution of complexity. Namely, the emergent ecosystem supplies a context in which a novel phenotype gains functionality. Realizing such a phenotype, novel genotypes can evolve, which, in turn, results in the evolution of more complex ecological organization. Hence, the evolutionary feedback between information and organization, and thereby the evolution of complexity.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Eugene V Koonin, Eörs Szathmáry (nominated by Anthony M Poole), and Chris Adami. For the full reviews, please go to the Reviewers' comments section.

[1]  M. Eigen,et al.  The Hypercycle: A principle of natural self-organization , 2009 .

[2]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Hypercycles and the origin of life , 1979, Nature.

[3]  C Bresch,et al.  Hypercycles, parasites and packages. , 1980, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  E. Szathmáry,et al.  Group selection of early replicators and the origin of life. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[5]  B. Ganem RNA world , 1987, Nature.

[6]  M. Eigen,et al.  Molecular quasi-species. , 1988 .

[7]  Bruce A. Shapiro,et al.  An algorithm for comparing multiple RNA secondary structures , 1988, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[8]  T. D. Schneider,et al.  Sequence logos: a new way to display consensus sequences. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  An Approach to the Synthesis of Life , 1991 .

[10]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  Spiral wave structure in pre-biotic evolution: hypercycles stable against parasites , 1991 .

[11]  T. Ikegami,et al.  Homeochaos: dynamic stability of a symbiotic network with population dynamics and evolving mutation rates , 1992 .

[12]  Walter Fontana,et al.  Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures , 1994 .

[13]  P. Schuster,et al.  From sequences to shapes and back: a case study in RNA secondary structures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  Thomas S. Ray,et al.  Evolution, complexity, entropy and artificial reality , 1994 .

[15]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[16]  J. D. van der Laan,et al.  Predator—prey coevolution: interactions across different timescales , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  M. Hanczyc,et al.  Experimental evolution of complexity: in vitro emergence of intermolecular ribozyme interactions. , 1998, RNA.

[18]  P. Stadler,et al.  The evolution of diversity in replicator networks. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[19]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[20]  C V Forst,et al.  Molecular evolution of catalysis. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  C. Adami,et al.  Evolution of Biological Complexity , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[22]  Claus O. Wilke,et al.  SELECTION FOR FITNESS VERSUS SELECTION FOR ROBUSTNESS IN RNA SECONDARY STRUCTURE FOLDING , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  C. Wilke SELECTION FOR FITNESS VERSUS SELECTION FOR ROBUSTNESS IN RNA SECONDARY STRUCTURE FOLDING , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[24]  Jack W. Szostak,et al.  Functional information: Molecular messages , 2003, Nature.

[25]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Molecular Replicator Dynamics , 2003, Adv. Complex Syst..

[26]  Susanna C. Manrubia,et al.  Motif selection in a model of evolving replicators: The role of surfaces and limited transport in network topology , 2003 .

[27]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[28]  John S. McCaskill,et al.  Folding Stabilizes the Evolution of Catalysts , 2004, Artificial Life.

[29]  Zoltán Toroczkai,et al.  Spatial Models of Prebiotic Evolution: Soup Before Pizza? , 2003, Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere.

[30]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[31]  M. Eigen Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[32]  C. Ofria,et al.  Adaptive Radiation from Resource Competition in Digital Organisms , 2004, Science.

[33]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Multilevel Selection in Models of Prebiotic Evolution: Compartments and Spatial Self-organization , 2003, Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere.

[34]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  On the origin of genomes and cells within inorganic compartments , 2005, Trends in Genetics.

[35]  Arthur L. Koch,et al.  Evolution vs the number of gene copies per primitive cell , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[36]  U. Niesert,et al.  Origin of life between scylla and charybdis , 2005, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[37]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Evolving towards the hypercycle: A spatial model of molecular evolution , 2006 .

[38]  E. Szathmáry The origin of replicators and reproducers , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Marie-Christine Brun,et al.  TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[40]  Paulien Hogeweg,et al.  The Role of Complex Formation and Deleterious Mutations for the Stability of RNA-Like Replicator Systems , 2007, Journal of Molecular Evolution.

[41]  Patrick L. Griffin,et al.  Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Carlos Briones,et al.  Modular evolution and increase of functional complexity in replicating RNA molecules. , 2006, RNA.

[43]  N. Moran,et al.  Colloquium Papers: Symbiosis as an adaptive process and source of phenotypic complexity , 2007 .

[44]  M. Lynch The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.