Controlling mobile sensors for monitoring events with coverage constraints

Sensor networks are systems of many small units that work together to monitor a given environment. Endowing such sensor units with mobility can allow them to reactively converge on more interesting portions of their environment. This enables the concentration of sensing resources where they are most useful and provides robustness by delivering redundancy at the point of interest. However, when converging, in general the sensors should not leave any portion of the environment unsensed. In this paper, we review distributed methods for controlling the sensors and describe a family of distributed methods for retaining coverage while allowing the convergence to proceed where possible. The coverage methods are based on the Voronoi diagram of the sensors' positions, and can use different amounts of communication and computation to produce complete coverage of the environment. We also describe extensions that serve to make coverage more uniform or allow specific areas to be left uncovered. We present implementations of these algorithms in simulation and describe results and avenues of future work.

[1]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Spreading Out: A Local Approach to Multi-robot Coverage , 2002, DARS.

[2]  Gregory J. Pottie,et al.  Wireless sensor networks , 1998, 1998 Information Theory Workshop (Cat. No.98EX131).

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields : A Distributed , Scalable Solution to the Area Coverage Problem , 2002 .

[4]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Robomote: a tiny mobile robot platform for large-scale ad-hoc sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[5]  Qun Li,et al.  Sending messages to mobile users in disconnected ad-hoc wireless networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[6]  Qun Li,et al.  Distributed algorithms for guiding navigation across a sensor network , 2003, MobiCom '03.

[7]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Behavior-based formation control for multirobot teams , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Robert Szewczyk,et al.  System architecture directions for networked sensors , 2000, ASPLOS IX.

[9]  Francesco Bullo,et al.  COVERAGE CONTROL FOR MOBILE SENSING NETWORKS: VARIATIONS ON A THEME , 2002 .

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  ASCENT: adaptive self-configuring sensor networks topologies , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[11]  Tucker R. Balch,et al.  Social potentials for scalable multi-robot formations , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[12]  Jonathan R. Agre,et al.  An Integrated Architecture for Cooperative Sensing Networks , 2000, Computer.

[13]  Satish Kumar,et al.  Next century challenges: scalable coordination in sensor networks , 1999, MobiCom.

[14]  Qun Li,et al.  MobiCom poster: reactive behavior in self-reconfiguring sensor networks , 2003, MOCO.

[15]  Zack J. Butler,et al.  Event-Based Motion Control for Mobile-Sensor Networks , 2003, IEEE Pervasive Comput..

[16]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  ASCENT: Adaptive Self-Configuring sEnsor Networks Topologies , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[17]  Lynne E. Parker,et al.  Cooperative Motion Coordination Amidst Dynamic Obstacles , 2002, DARS.

[18]  Hongyan Wang,et al.  Social potential fields: A distributed behavioral control for autonomous robots , 1995, Robotics Auton. Syst..