Mobile connected dermatoscope and confocal laser scanning microscope: a useful combination applied in facial simple sensitive skin

Little is known as the effects of mobile connected dermatoscope services on diagnostic accuracy for sensitive skin. Confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) can non‐invasively measure the thickness of epidermis. Combination of the two devices to observe sensitive skin may receive unexpected effects. To evaluate the application effect on sensitive skin with the combination of Handyscope and confocal laser scanning microscope. Twenty simple sensitive‐skinned patients and 20 volunteers participated in the study. Cheek, typically, dermoscopic images were obtained from patients, and the changes in the skin texture were observed. Their epidermis thicknesses as well as the volunteers’ were measured so that the thicknesses of the two groups were compared. Dermoscopic pictures of the skin texture obviously showed that dilated capillaries looked like earthworms with pigmented patches more or less floating above, and skin roughness as well as deepened dermatoglyph were also conspicuously present in some patients. The mean epidermal thickness of the patients was 79.01 μm and the volunteers’ was 85.78 μm. The difference between the two groups reached 6.77 μm. There was a statistical significance (P = 0.001). Mobile connected dermatoscope and confocal laser scanning microscope might be the choice for simple sensitive skin investigation.

[1]  H. Maibach,et al.  Sensitive and ethnic skin. A need for special skin-care agents? , 1991, Dermatologic clinics.

[2]  R. Hofmann-Wellenhof,et al.  Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening: diagnostic accuracy of clinical and dermoscopic image tele‐evaluation using cellular phones , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[3]  J. Wilkinson,et al.  Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[4]  Harold S Rabinovitz,et al.  Accuracy of teledermatology for pigmented neoplasms. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[5]  Y. Lee,et al.  Skin thickness of Korean adults , 2002, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[6]  S. Varma,et al.  Mobile teledermatology for skin tumour screening , 2011, The British journal of dermatology.

[7]  L. Misery,et al.  Sensitive skin in Europe , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[8]  E Berardesca,et al.  Concordance between in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy and histology in the evaluation of plaque psoriasis , 2009, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[9]  O. Mills,et al.  Defining the susceptibility of acne-prone and sensitive skin populations to extrinsic factors. , 1991, Dermatologic clinics.

[10]  Harold S Rabinovitz,et al.  Accuracy of teledermatology for nonpigmented neoplasms. , 2009, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[11]  H. Sutton AN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY , 1937 .

[12]  E. Berardesca,et al.  Sensitive skin: mechanisms and diagnosis , 2005, International journal of cosmetic science.