Assessing the awareness of performance decrements in distracted drivers.

Many studies have documented the performance decrements associated with driver distractions; however, few have examined drivers' awareness of these distraction effects. The current study measured how well-calibrated drivers are with respect to performance decrements from distracting tasks. In this test track study, 40 younger and older drivers completed a series of tasks on a hand-held or hands-free cell phone while driving around a course in an instrumented vehicle. Subjective estimates of performance decrements were compared to actual performance decrements. Although their driving performance suffered in dual-task conditions, drivers were generally not well-calibrated to the magnitude of the distraction effects (r=-.38 to .16). In some cases, estimates of distraction were opposite of the observed effects (i.e., smaller estimates of distraction corresponded to larger performance deficits). Errors in calibration were unassociated with several measures of overconfidence in safety and skill, among other variables. We discuss the implications of these findings for potential mitigation strategies for distracted driving.

[1]  Jack B. Soll.  Determinants of Overconfidence and Miscalibration: The Roles of Random Error and Ecological Structure☆ , 1996 .

[2]  D. Gronwall.  Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion , 1977, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Training for calibration. , 1980 .

[4]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Matt Sundeen,et al.  Cell Phones and Highway Safety: 2006 State Legislative Update , 2003 .

[6]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[7]  H Alm,et al.  Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones--a simulator study. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  M. Lesch,et al.  Driving performance during concurrent cell-phone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements? , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  P. Hancock,et al.  Stress, Workload, and Fatigue , 2009 .

[10]  K A Brookhuis,et al.  The effects of mobile telephoning on driving performance. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  J. Baranski,et al.  The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  A J McKnight,et al.  The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[14]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[15]  S. Oskamp.  OVERCONFIDENCE IN CASE-STUDY JUDGMENTS. , 1965, Journal of consulting psychology.

[16]  Christopher B. Mayhorn,et al.  Perceptions of Driver Distraction by Cellular Phone Users and Nonusers , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[17]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Examining the Impact of Cell Phone Conversations on Driving Using Meta-Analytic Techniques , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  How in the World Did We Ever Get into That Mode? Mode Error and Awareness in Supervisory Control , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  T. Salthouse.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. , 1996, Psychological review.

[20]  P A Hancock,et al.  The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  S. Lichtenstein,et al.  Do those who know more also know more about how much they know?*1 , 1977 .

[22]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[23]  Frank S. Barickman,et al.  A Simple CCD Based Lane Tracking System , 1999 .

[24]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Influence of Age and Proximity Warning Devices on Collision Avoidance in Simulated Driving , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[25]  Albert Kircher,et al.  Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  A. H. Murphy.  A New Vector Partition of the Probability Score , 1973 .

[27]  David L. Strayer,et al.  Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone , 2001, Psychological science.

[28]  J. Baranski,et al.  On the calibration of knowledge and perception. , 1995, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  Heikki Summala,et al.  Factors influencing the use of cellular (mobile) phone during driving and hazards while using it. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[32]  M. Horswill,et al.  DRIVERS' RATINGS OF DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF THEIR OWN DRIVING SKILL: A GREATER ILLUSION OF SUPERIORITY FOR SKILLS THAT RELATE TO ACCIDENT INVOLVEMENT , 2004 .