Patient specific stress and rupture analysis of ascending thoracic aneurysms.

An ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) is a serious medical condition which, more often than not, requires surgery. Aneurysm diameter is the primary clinical criterion for determining when surgical intervention is necessary but, biomechanical studies have suggested that the diameter criterion is insufficient. This manuscript presents a method for obtaining the patient specific wall stress distribution of the ATAA and the retrospective rupture risk for each patient. Five human ATAAs and the preoperative dynamic CT scans were obtained during elective surgeries to replace each patient's aneurysm with a synthetic graft. The material properties and rupture stress for each tissue sample were identified using bulge inflation tests. The dynamic CT scans were used to generate patient specific geometries for a finite element (FE) model of each patient's aneurysm. The material properties from the bulge inflation tests were implemented in the FE model and the wall stress distribution at four different pressures was estimated. Three different rupture risk assessments were compared: the maximum diameter, the rupture risk index, and the overpressure index. The peak wall stress values for the patients ranged from 28% to 94% of the ATAA's failure stress. The rupture risk and overpressure indices were both only weakly correlated with diameter (ρ=-0.29, both cases). In the future, we plan to conduct a large experimental and computational study that includes asymptomatic patients under surveillance, patients undergoing elective surgery, and patients who have experienced rupture or dissection to determine if the rupture risk index or maximum diameter can meaningfully differentiate between the groups.

[1]  J. Bavaria,et al.  Impact of Wall Thickness and Saccular Geometry on the Computational Wall Stress of Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms , 2013, Circulation.

[2]  J. Blankensteijn,et al.  Wall stress analysis in small asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter. , 2003, Journal of vascular surgery.

[4]  Ellen Kuhl,et al.  The emergence of extracellular matrix mechanics and cell traction forces as important regulators of cellular self-organization , 2015, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[5]  Mark F Fillinger,et al.  Elastic and Rupture Properties of Porcine Aortic Tissue Measured Using Inflation Testing , 2006, Cardiovascular engineering.

[6]  John A Elefteriades,et al.  Natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms: size matters, plus moving beyond size. , 2013, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[7]  Dimitrios P Sokolis,et al.  Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms are associated with compositional remodeling and vessel stiffening but not weakening in age-matched subjects. , 2009, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[8]  Leonie Rouleau,et al.  Local mechanical and structural properties of healthy and diseased human ascending aorta tissue. , 2009, Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Pathology.

[9]  J. Swedenborg,et al.  Ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysms: a study of incidence and mortality rates. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[10]  Dimitrios P Sokolis,et al.  Regional and directional variations in the mechanical properties of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  D. Vorp,et al.  The effects of aneurysm on the biaxial mechanical behavior of human abdominal aorta. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  Santanu Chandra,et al.  The Role of Geometric and Biomechanical Factors in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture Risk Assessment , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  Anirban Jana,et al.  The importance of patient-specific regionally varying wall thickness in abdominal aortic aneurysm biomechanics. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[14]  R N Vaishnav,et al.  Compressibility of the Arterial Wall , 1968, Circulation research.

[15]  T Christian Gasser,et al.  Importance of material model in wall stress prediction in abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2013, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  E. Bluth,et al.  Steady flow in models of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Part II: Wall stresses and their implication for in vivo thrombosis and rupture. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[17]  Robert A Peattie,et al.  Pulsatile flow in fusiform models of abdoiminal aortic aneurysms: flow fields, velocity patterns and flow-induced wall stresses. , 2004, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[18]  Pierre Badel,et al.  In vitro analysis of localized aneurysm rupture. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  J. Rodríguez,et al.  A Pull-Back Algorithm to Determine the Unloaded Vascular Geometry in Anisotropic Hyperelastic AAA Passive Mechanics , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  T. Sundt Indications for aortic aneurysmectomy: too many variables and not enough equations? , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  Yongjie Zhang,et al.  Surface Curvature as a Classifier of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Comparative Analysis , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  Jia Lu,et al.  Pointwise Identification of Elastic Properties in Nonlinear Hyperelastic Membranes—Part II: Experimental Validation , 2009 .

[23]  Ender A. Finol,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Geometry , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  D. Vorp,et al.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  R Berguer,et al.  In vitro characterisation of physiological and maximum elastic modulus of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms using uniaxial tensile testing. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[26]  Christian Reeps,et al.  The impact of model assumptions on results of computational mechanics in abdominal aortic aneurysm. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[27]  José David Martín-Guerrero,et al.  Estimation of the elastic parameters of human liver biomechanical models by means of medical images and evolutionary computation , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[28]  H. Demiray A note on the elasticity of soft biological tissues. , 1972, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  Wei Sun,et al.  Predictive biomechanical analysis of ascending aortic aneurysm rupture potential. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[30]  Friedhelm Beyersdorf,et al.  Flow-sensitive four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging: flow patterns in ascending aortic aneurysms. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[31]  John A Elefteriades,et al.  Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[32]  K. Eagle,et al.  Acute aortic syndromes and thoracic aortic aneurysm. , 2009, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[33]  J. Elefteriades,et al.  What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms? , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  J. Elefteriades,et al.  Surgical intervention criteria for thoracic aortic aneurysms: a study of growth rates and complications. , 1999, Annals of Thoracic Surgery.

[35]  C. Bodian,et al.  Prospective study of the natural history of thoracic aortic aneurysms. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[36]  Pierce A Grace,et al.  On the influence of patient‐specific material properties in computational simulations: A case study of a large ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[37]  J. Elefteriades,et al.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm clinically pertinent controversies and uncertainties. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  Jia Lu,et al.  Pointwise characterization of the elastic properties of planar soft tissues: application to ascending thoracic aneurysms , 2015, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[39]  J Swedenborg,et al.  Biomechanical rupture risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: model complexity versus predictability of finite element simulations. , 2010, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[40]  Elena S. Di Martino,et al.  Mechano-biology in the thoracic aortic aneurysm: a review and case study , 2014, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[41]  Jonathan P Vande Geest,et al.  A Biomechanics‐Based Rupture Potential Index for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Risk Assessment , 2006, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.