The interrelations between diagrammatic representations and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts

This study examined the instructional effectiveness of abstract diagrams and verbal explanations in learning from social science texts, which contained multi-thematic information and were new to the students. Two texts of about 4,000 words each were examined. Each text appeared in four versions, in which the verbal and schematic representations were manipulated. Unlike previous studies conducted on diagrams and other visual devices that are isolated from the broad research on verbal processing, this study incorporates the investigation of the diagrams' functional utility into the broad context of cognitive elaborations applied to text comprehension. 416 students of Everyman's University, the Open University of Israel, participated in the study. The main results indicate that: an explained diagram is more effective than an unexplained one in complex explanations; a diagram, in general, is more effective than a verbal explanation in representing sequential and hierarchical relations; a diagram has a significant effect on ‘active’ recollection and ‘passive’ retention; the mode of the text's design and presentation is more influential than the initial verbal and visual aptitudes; and finally, there are no differences between male and female in processing verbal and diagrammatic representations.

[1]  G. Salomon Interaction of media, cognition and learning , 1979 .

[2]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  Studying Strategies and Their Implications for Textbook Design , 1985 .

[3]  K. Alesandrini,et al.  Pictures and adult learning , 1984 .

[4]  Joseph L. Vaughan Concept Structuring: The Technique and Empirical Evidence , 1984 .

[5]  Michael Macdonald-Ross,et al.  2: Graphics in Texts , 1977 .

[6]  Malcolm L. Fleming,et al.  On pictures in educational research , 1979 .

[7]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Media and Symbol Systems as Related to Cognition and Learning. , 1979 .

[8]  Philip J. Brody In search of instructional utility: A function-based approach to pictorial research , 1984 .

[9]  D. Olson Media and Symbols: The Forms of Expression, Communication, and Education , 1974 .

[10]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .

[11]  Elizabeth B. Bernhardt,et al.  Learning and comprehension of text , 1988 .

[12]  Donald F. Dansereau,et al.  The Development of Spatial Learning Strategies , 1984 .

[13]  M. V. Moore,et al.  The Educational Effectiveness of Graphic Displays for Computer Assisted Instruction. Final Report. , 1978 .

[14]  M. Macdonald-Ross,et al.  Scientific diagrams and the generation of plausible hypotheses: An essay in the history of ideas , 1979 .

[15]  Thomas H. Anderson,et al.  Mapping: Representing Informative Text Diagrammatically , 1984 .

[16]  Michael Twyman,et al.  Using Pictorial Language: A Discussion of the Dimensions of the Problem , 1985 .

[17]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Designing usable texts , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  Robert Waller Four aspects of graphic communication , 1979 .

[19]  Joost A. Breuker,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Spatial Learning Strategies , 1984 .

[20]  Bonnie B. Armbruster,et al.  CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF READING Technical Report No , 283 AN ANALYSIS OF THE OUTCOMES AND IMPLICATIONS OF INTERVENTION RESEARCH , 2007 .

[21]  Paul A. Kolers,et al.  Processing of visible language , 1979 .