Compliance display using a tilting-plate tactile feedback device

This paper presents a tactile display device for replicating compliance sensation when interacting with deformable and non-deformable compliant objects in a virtual environment. Two small tilting plates approximately reproduce surface deformations of a compliant object. In addition to tactile information, kinesthetic information is rendered through a modified haptic paddle force feedback device. The tilting plates are moved in conjunction with the measured position of the user's finger as they pressed into the virtual surface. In a psychophysical experiment, we evaluated the effect of adding tilting motion of the device's actuated plates on the perceived compliance of a virtual surface with a kinesthetic stiffness of 60 N/mm. The experiment results indicate that tilting rates of 5, 10, and 20 deg/cm reduced the perceived stiffness of the surface by 3, 9, and 17 N/m, respectively. The advantages of the new device include its light-weight, low-cost, and simple design. These device features make it practical to integrate this compliance display with user interfaces for applications such as video games or even robotic surgery.

[1]  R. Howe,et al.  Dynamic lumped element response of the human fingerpad. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  Development of a contact width sensor for tactile tele-presentation of softness , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[3]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Cues for Haptic Perception of Compliance , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[4]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  A new fabric-based softness display , 2010, 2010 IEEE Haptics Symposium.

[5]  Akio Yamamoto,et al.  Development of a 2-DOF softness feeling display for tactile tele-presentation of deformable surfaces , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  A. Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[7]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Rendering Softness: Integration of Kinesthetic and Cutaneous Information in a Haptic Device , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[8]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Reviewing the technological challenges associated with the development of a laparoscopic palpation device , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[9]  K. Fujita,et al.  A New Softness Display Interface by Dynamic Fingertip Contact Area Control by Dynamic Fingertip Cont , 2001 .

[10]  Dequan Zou,et al.  Plantar tissue stiffness in patients with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Fletcher,et al.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How? , 1999, JAMA.

[13]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  A sensor-based minimally invasive surgery tool for detecting tissutal elastic properties(003) 5323219 , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Liam A. Haveran,et al.  Optimizing laparoscopic task efficiency: the role of camera and monitor positions , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  K. Johnson Contact Mechanics: Frontmatter , 1985 .

[16]  George A. Gescheider,et al.  Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[17]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Relative availability of surface and object properties during early haptic processing. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Astrid M. L. Kappers,et al.  Kinaesthetic and Cutaneous Contributions to the Perception of Compressibility , 2008, EuroHaptics.

[19]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Tactual discrimination of softness. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Haptic discrimination of softness in teleoperation: the role of the contact area spread rate , 2000, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[21]  C. Davis Touch , 1997, The Lancet.