Recalculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of value-added trade: An input-output analysis of China's trade data

Using traditional trade statistics to calculate CO2 emissions embodied in international trade results in significant miscalculations and a deeper divide between countries. The aim of this research is to provide a reasonable estimate of carbon emissions to help policymakers in each country address their actual share of responsibility. This study employs the World Input-Output Database and the gross export decomposition methodology to recount the CO2 emissions embodied in China's international trade from the perspective of value-added trade. The result shows that reliance on traditional statistics caused a significant overestimation of China's imports and exports: US$ 398.77 billion and US$ 504.46 billion for China's imports and exports, respectively. Our findings suggest that 177.24 million tons of carbon emissions embodied in imports and 907.636 million tons of carbon emission embodied in exports were over calculated. The result obtained with traditional calculation methods has artificially increased the responsibility share of China in the global emissions reduction. We also compare the CO2 emission coefficients of China with those of other countries. Our findings suggest that the high emission coefficients of most Chinese industrial sectors determine the carbon emissions embodied in China's exports to be higher than in its imports.

[1]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: The effects of spatial aggregation , 2010 .

[2]  Stefan Giljum,et al.  Designing an indicator of environmental responsibility , 2006 .

[3]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[4]  M. S. Taylor,et al.  Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence , 2003 .

[5]  M. Lenzen,et al.  Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice , 2007 .

[6]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade: A multi-region model for China , 2014 .

[7]  Thijs ten Raa,et al.  The Economics of Input-Output Analysis: Index , 2006 .

[8]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Energy and carbon embodied in the international trade of Brazil: an input–output approach , 2001 .

[9]  Carlos Rodríguez Monroy,et al.  Chinese energy and climate policies after Durban: Save the Kyoto Protocol , 2012 .

[10]  Demin Chen,et al.  Global Value Chains and Trade in Value-Added , 2016 .

[11]  Tiago Domingos,et al.  Consumer and producer environmental responsibility: Comparing two approaches , 2008 .

[12]  Robert C. Johnson,et al.  Accounting for intermediates: Production sharing and trade in value added , 2012 .

[13]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  The contribution of Chinese exports to climate change , 2008 .

[14]  Zhi Wang,et al.  Tracing Value-Added and Double Counting in Gross Exports , 2012 .

[15]  Bin Shui,et al.  The role of CO2 embodiment in US-China trade , 2006 .

[16]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Input–output analysis of CO2 emissions embodied in trade and the driving forces: Processing and normal exports , 2013 .

[17]  Chuanwang Sun,et al.  Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China , 2010 .

[18]  E. Dietzenbacher,et al.  An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input–Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production , 2015 .

[19]  Yuan Wang,et al.  CO2 emissions embodied in China–US trade: Input–output analysis based on the emergy/dollar ratio , 2011 .