Single Pulse TMS-Induced Modulations of Resting Brain Neurodynamics Encoded in EEG Phase

Integration of electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) provides a useful framework for quantifying stimulation-induced modulations of neural dynamics. Amplitude and frequency modulations by different TMS protocols have been previously investigated, but the study of stimulation-induced effects on EEG phase has been more limited. We examined changes in resting brain dynamics following single TMS pulses, focusing on measures in the phase domain, to assess their sensitivity to stimulation effects. We observed a significant, approximately global increase in EEG relative phase following prolonged (>20 min) single-pulse TMS. In addition, we estimated higher rates of phase fluctuation from the slope of estimated phase curves, and higher numbers of phase resetting intervals following TMS over motor cortex, particularly in frontal and centro-parietal/parietal channels. Phase changes were only significantly different from their pre-TMS values at the end of the stimulation session, which suggests that prolonged single-pulse TMS may result in cumulative changes in neural activity reflected in the phase of the EEG. This is a novel result, as prior studies have reported only transient stimulation-related effects in the amplitude and frequency domains following single-pulse TMS.

[1]  S. Rossi,et al.  Clinical neurophysiology of aging brain: From normal aging to neurodegeneration , 2007, Progress in Neurobiology.

[2]  M. Hallett,et al.  Responses to rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  J. Rothwell,et al.  How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify neuronal activity in the brain? Implications for studies of cognition , 2009, Cortex.

[4]  Walsh,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a neurochromometrics of mind. , 2003 .

[5]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Suppression of ipsilateral motor cortex facilitates motor skill learning , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  W. Freeman.  Origin, structure, and role of background EEG activity. Part 2. Analytic phase , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  P M Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive evaluation of central motor tract excitability changes following peripheral nerve stimulation in healthy humans. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Technology Insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[9]  Tim Kiemel,et al.  Relative Phase Behavior of Two Slowly Coupled Oscillators , 1993, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[10]  Khaled H. Hamed,et al.  Time-frequency analysis , 2003 .

[11]  E. Parzen.  On Estimation of a Probability Density Function and Mode , 1962 .

[12]  C. Miniussi,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG Offers New Prospects in Cognitive Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[13]  P M Rossini,et al.  The role of the left frontal lobe in action naming: rTMS evidence , 2002, Neurology.

[14]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  A Review of Combined TMS-EEG Studies to Characterize Lasting Effects of Repetitive TMS and Assess Their Usefulness in Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience , 2009, Brain Topography.

[15]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Breakspear.  Nonlinear phase desynchronization in human electroencephalographic data , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[17]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Estimation of brain state changes associated with behavior, stimulation and epilepsy , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[18]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Grammatical Distinctions in the Left Frontal Cortex , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Baseline cortical excitability determines whether TMS disrupts or facilitates behavior. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Markus Zahn,et al.  Three-dimensional head model Simulation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Catherine Stamoulis,et al.  Application of matched-filtering to extract EEG features and decouple signal contributions from multiple seizure foci in brain malformations , 2009, 2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering.

[22]  M. Casanova,et al.  Effects of Low Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Gamma Frequency Oscillations and Event-Related Potentials During Processing of Illusory Figures in Autism , 2009, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[23]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[25]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Interindividual variability of the modulatory effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical excitability , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.